bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,368
- 2,180
So you actually expect people to take you seriously?More childishness from you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you actually expect people to take you seriously?More childishness from you.
Did they make it too hard for Dim retards to vote? Republicans are always pikin on you! Now your votes will be counted honestly. Oh, you po witto rascals!
That's only when the "winner" wins by fraud.
We will the minute we get a hearing on the subject. Turds like you keep saying we can't have a hearing about fraud unless we have already proven it. What's the point of the hearing if it has already been proven? You catch-22 arguments only fool the gullible.
He's obviously wrong.The winner won and the loser's own AG says there was no fraud that changed the election results.
How is it "BS?"You are as gullible as they come. Posting this BS shows that.
You're a fucking idiot. The government can't enlist companies/third parties to do things it is constitutionally prohibited from doing. You're a poor liar and even a poorer propagandist.
.
He's obviously wrong.
No it can't. The government has no business telling anyone what the truth is.The government can urge social media companies to be careful of what misinformation could be spread on their site. You are just a idiot.
Everyone who supports Democrats is wrong, period.Everyone is wrong but you. You are a idiot.
So, it’s perfectly acceptable for the FBI to have 115 employees embedded within Twitter, the lead counsel a former DoJ lawyer who was behind the Russia hoax, payments to Twitter from the FBI, and weekly meetings targeting right leaning posts as disinformation, using 80 agents to monitor Twitter?
Whats wrong with you?
No it can't. The government has no business telling anyone what the truth is.
You are a moron and this garbage proves it.
Everyone who supports Democrats is wrong, period.
Was more evidence needed??
He's obviously wrong.
The FBI isn't telling USMB to silence me.
So the comparison you offered is POINTLESS
/-----/ And yet, there is this:
Matt Taibbi
@mtaibbi
Dec 16
15. Just to show the FBI can be hyper-intrusive in both directions, they also asked Twitter to review a blue-leaning account for a different joke, except here it was even more obvious that
@clairefosterPHD
, who kids a lot, was kidding:
![]()
/——-/ Nothing, as long as that is all they do.Still no answer to the question. I didn't ask what I should do when 2 guys show up at my door at 2am.
I asked what was wrong with the FBI working with social media to block foreign interference with our election?
/———/ You can spin for the government only for so long But, I admire your tenacity.Nothing damning about it. They are making Twitter aware of certain activities. They are not threatening anyone.