WikiLeaks Founder Says Obama Should Resign...

He's not a fucking journalist. He knowingly disseminated stolen information.
If Assange had released documents which implicated Obama's intention to (fill in the blank), you would be calling him a hero, and FOXNEWS would hire him as a 'contributor'.

Synthia, it seems you and Swallow don't know shit about California Girl...

It just adds to the ever expanding list of "Shit you know nothing about"...

Fuck off..you jiz guzzling faggot.

Dr. Kneepads..you need a new act. I ain't gay and you ain't getting a swallow.

No matter how much you beg. Shitstain..
 
Last edited:
LOL The only one trying to ignore the rule of law is you fool.

Add red herring ad hominem double entendre to your list.:lol:

You are on a roll today buddy... a toilet roll, troll.:clap2:

Another whack job.

As you have seen others reported the issue with the condom, but you think it might be a straw argument. The fact you were to lazy to stay current on the topic means someone might try to make a straw argument.

I think whack job is too mild. But you will prove to be an ass, and I will slam you tough. Please proceed.

Yet you are the one that keeps resorting to the ad hominem. How does it feel to be such a hypocrite?:lol:
 
Add red herring ad hominem double entendre to your list.:lol:

You are on a roll today buddy... a toilet roll, troll.:clap2:

Another whack job.

As you have seen others reported the issue with the condom, but you think it might be a straw argument. The fact you were to lazy to stay current on the topic means someone might try to make a straw argument.

I think whack job is too mild. But you will prove to be an ass, and I will slam you tough. Please proceed.

Yet you are the one that keeps resorting to the ad hominem. How does it feel to be such a hypocrite?:lol:


LOL You challenged me. You havent proven the info false. Why should I give you any credit at all. You didnt have the stones to do a search
 
He's not a fucking journalist. He knowingly disseminated stolen information.
If Assange had released documents which implicated Obama's intention to (fill in the blank), you would be calling him a hero, and FOXNEWS would hire him as a 'contributor'.

Synthia, it seems you and Swallow don't know shit about California Girl...

It just adds to the ever expanding list of "Shit you know nothing about"...
Another Night Train fail.
 
So what? Who really give a shit what he thinks? George Bush and the entire Congess that gave him the deciding power to invade and occupy Iraq should have resigned too.

Furthermore I can think of several failures on President Obamas part but none rise to the level that he should resign over.
 
Another whack job.

As you have seen others reported the issue with the condom, but you think it might be a straw argument. The fact you were to lazy to stay current on the topic means someone might try to make a straw argument.

I think whack job is too mild. But you will prove to be an ass, and I will slam you tough. Please proceed.

Yet you are the one that keeps resorting to the ad hominem. How does it feel to be such a hypocrite?:lol:


LOL You challenged me. You havent proven the info false. Why should I give you any credit at all. You didnt have the stones to do a search

Your red herring just left its hook and got caught in the Gulf Stream. WTF are you even talking about?:blahblah:
 
WikiLeaks boy should be hunted down by the CIA and shot dead.

End of story.

Next :D



Except the story would not actually end...







What a delusional egomaniac...Anybody know how Bradley Manning came to know Assange, did they have a relationship BEFORE the breach...?




>

Found this article with good info on how he did it:



How Manning Stole The Cables



[/b]
Many outside the military and diplomatic communities have wondered just how such a large amount of sensitive missives could have been taken. As a public service, Conflict Health is very pleased to publish a guest article from Captain Nick Dubaz, an Active Duty Army Civil Affairs Officer, explaining in full technical detail how it happened.

A number of commenters on the latest Wikileaks release have questioned how one junior enlisted Army intelligence analyst could possibly have collected and stolen such a massive number of documents unaided and undiscovered. Indeed, the very mention of “intelligence” evokes notions of secure, guarded, windowless facilities under constant surveillance employing the latest biometric technology to secure America’s secrets. This image may have once been partially true in the case of Top Secret and Compartmented information, but the distributed nature of our modern intelligence community and the proliferation of secret network access necessitated by our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has fundamentally changed both protection of and access to classified information. The technical methods Private First Class Bradley Manning, the accused leaker, may have used to obtain and steal the material and transmit it to Wikileaks are simple and demonstrate the intelligence community’s vulnerability to an insider threat.

All mission traffic in Iraq and Afghanistan occurs on computer systems classified at the Secret-Releasable to NATO/ISAF level or above. Historically, mission traffic occurred at the Secret-NOFORN (Not Releasable to Foreign Nationals) level on the SIPR network (Secret Internet Protocol Router) and non-US elements operated on separate networks known as CENTRIX segregated by organizational membership (NATO, ISAF, etc). This caused significant information sharing problems and now lower level U.S. forces are transitioning many functions to CENTRIX to create a common mission network. Regardless, these information systems are now present at every Company-level headquarters and above, providing wide access to Secret-level intelligence and diplomatic information processed and disseminated on the network. Access to Top Secret (TS) and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) information systems remains much more limited, but is still partially vulnerable to Bradley Manning-like insider threats.

The Wikileaks reports on Iraq and Afghanistan are from a system known as CIDNE (Combined Information/Data Network Exchange) which is the latest iteration of the database of record for all tactical reporting across the OIF and OEF theaters. The release is only a tiny percentage of the actual data contained in the database. Each record in the Wikileaks release is only the initial text report often transcribed from the radio or secret chat rooms. After the incident/action is completed, each record is typically updated with new information, pictures, videos, PowerPoints and other relevant documentation. To allow for transfer into incompatible systems and other software packages, CIDNE includes an “Export to Excel” feature that allows for the rapid filtering and transfer of records to other systems. Bradley Manning likely utilized this feature to export the comprehensive CIDNE database that he would later transmit to Wikileaks. Such an action could be completed in less than an hour depending on the bandwidth available and leaves no signature that would be readily noticed as unusual or alarming.


(cont...)
How Manning Stole The Cables ? Conflict Health
He sounds more and more like some fucked in the head idiot that imagines himself as the Joker or the Riddler. What a toad.



I know, right? I picture them more like Ren and Stimpy.

"Are you theenking what I'm theenking? We could ruuuule the world!"
:cuckoo:
 
Yet you are the one that keeps resorting to the ad hominem. How does it feel to be such a hypocrite?:lol:


LOL You challenged me. You havent proven the info false. Why should I give you any credit at all. You didnt have the stones to do a search

Your red herring just left its hook and got caught in the Gulf Stream. WTF are you even talking about?:blahblah:

Already lost.

It is why I have such little patience with people like you.

Had you simply stated I had not heard that info before do you have a link, or something to that effect. This conversation would have been quite different.

Do you even remember why you opened your mouth?
 
I've can't believe that Barry Soetoro is so quiet about a security breach? He has not uttered a single word about this?
Something tells me Obama likes the damage it will do to us.
I will agree with Assange on one thing – Obama needs to resign.

:lol:

The Left eating the Left.:lol:
Soros has really been disappointed in Obamas performance…
I can't wait until he releases the Russian leaks.
Radiation poisoning anyone.....
 
Last edited:

"Are you theenking what I'm theenking? We could ruuuule the world!"
:cuckoo:
images
 
LOL You challenged me. You havent proven the info false. Why should I give you any credit at all. You didnt have the stones to do a search

Your red herring just left its hook and got caught in the Gulf Stream. WTF are you even talking about?:blahblah:

Already lost.

It is why I have such little patience with people like you.

Had you simply stated I had not heard that info before do you have a link, or something to that effect. This conversation would have been quite different.

Do you even remember why you opened your mouth?
I know you consider yourself intelligent (and only you do), but I hate to point out the obvious that his is an internet forum. I have not opened my mouth, I have typed.:eusa_whistle:
And since I have never actually spoken to you, and (thank God) never will, this hardly qualifies as a conversation.:eusa_think:
 
Honestly, who gives a flying fuck what this asshole Assange thinks our president should or shouldn't do? Whether you are an Obama fan or not, ask yourself this: What kind of influence does a glorified computer hacker/ fugitive/ international criminal's opinion have on you? Who suddenly waved a magic wand and made Julian Assange king shit?


:clap2:
 
Yes it is.

There are several reasons why..and I will list the most obvious.

First it's an extremely harsh penalty for someone at the recieving end. This makes it difficult for most countries to help get this guy back to the states. Even if they agree that what Assange did was unlawful.

Second it's a staggering blow against whistle blowers and journalists. Mix in there are probably first amendment issues as well.

If Assange were facing a life sentence and was somehow brought back to the United States, you can bet your bottom dollar that there would be some very powerful groups coming to his aid.

Nothing Assange did makes a life sentence an appropriate punishment. It is not reasonable no matter how far one tries to stretch it.

I disagree.

First it's an extremely harsh penalty for someone at the recieving end. It's supposed to be. While my example is all "if's", it's not that iffy when dealing with terrorist. This makes it difficult for most countries to help get this guy back to the states. They only take issue with the Death penalty. Even if they agree that what Assange did was unlawful.

Second it's a staggering blow against whistle blowers and journalists.He not a whistle blower. This isn't even close to that. Mix in there are probably first amendment issues as well. No one has the right to spred secret info. and he is, by his own admission, not a journalist.

If Assange were facing a life sentence and was somehow brought back to the United States, you can bet your bottom dollar that there would be some very powerful groups coming to his aid. As always.

Nothing Assange did makes a life sentence an appropriate punishment. It is not reasonable no matter how far one tries to stretch it. We just aren't going to see eye to eye on this. I want him in jail, serving a harsh punishment [if he's found guilty] as an example of fools like him so that our nations can work together knowing they won't be exposed for everything they do. Bribes, gift giving, looking the other way, asking others to do the dirty work, etc, etc. Is criminal, in some countries, in others, it's how things are done.

That's fine. We agree to disagree.

Cheers. I owe you a beer for the fine debate.
:eusa_clap::thanks:

Pages of debate and we didn't stoop to name calling, or sniping. That might be a USMB record.

:2up::2up:
 
If Assange had released documents which implicated Obama's intention to (fill in the blank), you would be calling him a hero, and FOXNEWS would hire him as a 'contributor'.

Synthia, it seems you and Swallow don't know shit about California Girl...

It just adds to the ever expanding list of "Shit you know nothing about"...

Fuck off..you jiz guzzling faggot.

Dr. Kneepads..you need a new act. I ain't gay and you ain't getting a swallow.

No matter how much you beg. Shitstain..

I've explained to you more than once that your nick has nothing to do with "gay"... It is because you swallow all leftist propaganda.... It's obvious you can't comprehend this...


Its also disturbing that you keep pretending it somehow means I'm calling you gay...
 
Look at this kid, Bradley Manning. Feeling lonely and ignored. Boo hoo. Only 13 years old on 9/11 and thinks he knows everything about everything. Typical of a young kid who thinks he's so smart yet he's stupid enough to feed classified info to the sharks who despise the US cuz it made him feeeeel like he was doing something important. :doubt:





But who is Bradley Manning, and what motivated him?



Some insight into what drives him can be gleaned from the online chat he had from Iraq with a former hacker in which he talked about how he felt that no one had ever noticed him in life.

"[I'm] regularly ignored except when I had something essential then it was back to 'bring me coffee, then sweep the floor'," he told a fellow hacker who asked what he would do if his cover was blown during an online chat shortly after he is alleged to have sent the files to WikiLeaks. " felt like I was an abused work horse."

Manning even added an "emoticon" of a crying face :'(.

"I've been so isolated so long," he went on, adding he was "self-medicating like crazy". "I just wanted to be nice, and live a normal life … but events kept forcing me to figure out ways to survive … smart enough to know whats going on, but helpless to do anything … no one took any notice of me."

But he was also apparently filled with hope for what the leaks might achieve, having been buoyed by the public reaction to the Apache video, which had already been released, and hoped that he could do something positive.

"God knows what happens now," he said, having sent the material to WikiLeaks. "Hopefully worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms. If not … than we're doomed as a species. I will officially give up on the society we have if nothing happens. The reaction to the video gave me immense hope … CNN's iReport was overwhelmed … Twitter exploded …"

It is unlikely he would be disappointed with the coverage of the cables, which continue to lead news bulletins around the world. His chances of observing their impact from a position of freedom were shattered when the hacker he was talking to in May this year, Adrian Lamo, reported him to the federal authorities.

"I'd be one paranoid boy in your shoes," Lamo told him ominously. Within 24 hours officers from the US Army Criminal Investigation Command arrested Manning and took him into custody in Kuwait.

...



Hillary Clinton, the secretary of state, said it "tore at the fabric of government" and pledged "aggressive steps to hold responsible those who stole this information". Republicans branded it terrorism.

Manning faces a court martial and up to 52 years in prison for his alleged role in copying the diplomatic cables, as well as the leak of military logs about incidents in Afghanistan and Iraq and a classified military video which showed a crew of an American Apache helicopter gunning down a group of men who they thought had a rocket launcher. They turned out to include Reuters staff with a TV camera.

WikiLeaks cables: Bradley Manning faces 52 years in jail | World news | The Guardian
 
Last edited:
hillary-laughing.jpg



The AP reported:
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton knows how to try to get a laugh from a public embarrassment.
Ever since the website WikiLeaks started posting State Department memos — known as cables — and other classified government documents, U.S. officials have been turning a bit red as secret assessments of world leaders have become public.
She found time for a little light turn about WikiLeaks during a reception she hosted Saturday night at the State Department for recipients of this year’s Kennedy Center Honors — who include Oprah Winfrey and Paul McCartney.
Clinton said she found it extraordinary to greet so many talented people. She then said: `I am writing a cable about it, which I’m sure you’ll find soon on your closest website.”

 
Last edited:
The President resigning is a bit over the top but i would be in favor of Hillary Clinton resigning. She clearly ordered spying on UN Members. Time for her to go.
 
Ah but the fact that I said this does cut into the "point" you were making about my calls for hunting him down.

I'm not sure what you think you're saying or what you think my point is, but it doesn't.

You think publishing classified information, even if you've received it as a third party, justifies or should result in murder.

That demonstrates open contempt for the idea that the law means diddly squat and is basically an insane call for the removal of checks from power and wanton assassination on a whim.

Oh you made an empty comment that it should apply to you too...okay? You want credit for being consistently crazy? Bully for you.

Willful espionage against the United States, and the facilitation of that espionage, are crimes that should have capital punishments. If they are not US citizens doing this then an assasination is acceptable.

Heck both bush and obama have assasinated plenty of foreign nationals under the guise of terrorism already, its not like I'm saying anything new here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top