Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children

[RadiomanATL]

You have not proven your claim dipfuk.

Just a minute ago you said that you made a mistake and that I was correct.

Now you say I haven't proven the claim.

Do you even realize how much of a moran you look like? Every damn person in this thread, from the left, right, middle, anti-war and pro war have stomped mudholes in your ass, and all you do is stick your fingers in your ears and go "NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA I can't hear yoooooo", and the zoom off on another wild tangent to try and distract everyone from the beating you've taken.

You know what your main problem is? You just can't help yourself and HAVE to respond, which makes it so much easier for everyone on here to keep putting your dick in the dirt.

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nStVHVrbpo]YouTube - Immortal Technique - Cause Of Death(lyrics)[/ame]

 

[CurveLight]

Finally! Okay, my apologies for my misunderstanding. There are some problems with the claim. Gawker says 30 minutes is missing while jawa says 20. While I've tried I cannot clearly see the time stamp on the video. How does this system work? Is it Zulu? Mission? Looped? Jawa is claiming the segment was purposefully edited but with no evidence. From all available evidence the 38 minute version is all the contents leaked from the Pentagon so wiki has not edited. Jawa plucks a sworn statement and claims that was cut out from the video....but has absolutely no evidence the statement fits with the missing 20 minutes....if 20 minutes is actually missing. Jawa is a fuxxing joke of a source.....it's the extreme Right version of prison planet and is clearly partisan driven. These bozos make claims without anything to back it up.

Unfortunately the constant harping of "edited" versions all send the same message: your ilk is looking for justification because if what the available video shows exonerates the pilots then an edited version would be irrelevant. You can't have it both ways. You know the video shows an abuse of power and that is why you guys are desperately searching for different versions.

Unlike you, I admit my errors and rely on valid information so no wonder you are constantly whining about me. Maybe one day you too can learn to admit mistakes.....but I doubt it.

Just a minute ago you said that you made a mistake and that I was correct.

Now you say I haven't proven the claim.

Do you even realize how much of a moran you look like? Every damn person in this thread, from the left, right, middle, anti-war and pro war have stomped mudholes in your ass, and all you do is stick your fingers in your ears and go "NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA I can't hear yoooooo", and the zoom off on another wild tangent to try and distract everyone from the beating you've taken.

You know what your main problem is? You just can't help yourself and HAVE to respond, which makes it so much easier for everyone on here to keep putting your dick in the dirt.

I admitted I made a mistake by misunderstanding what you were claiming. I thought you were saying there is footage of the video actually available but all you are claiming is the jackasses at jawa have proven 20 minutes is missing. I clearly explained it but twice your cowardly **** skank ass edited my post when you quoted specifically to remove that part to try avoiding addressing it. Ignore it again ****.

 

[geauxtohell]

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents. Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

Wow.

No wonder you are so confused.

 

[CurveLight]

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents.

...



are you daft?

Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

WordNet Search - 3.0 - WordNet home page - Glossary - Help
Word to search for: Display Options: (Select option to change) Hide Example Sentences Hide Glosses Show Frequency Counts Show Database Locations Show Lexical File Info Show Lexical File Numbers Show Sense Keys Show Sense Numbers Key: "S:" = Show Synset (semantic) relations, "W:" = Show Word (lexical) relations
Noun

• S: (n) insurgent, insurrectionist, freedom fighter, rebel (a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the constituted authority (especially in the hope of improving conditions))
• S: (n) guerrilla, guerilla, irregular, insurgent (a member of an irregular armed force that fights a stronger force by sabotage and harassment)

Adjective

• S: (adj) insurgent, seditious, subversive (in opposition to a civil authority or government)

WordNet home page


They were believed to be in possession of automatic weapons (and later, before shooting, they were believed to have an RPG) in close proximity to US troops in a warzone.

I have yet to see any solid evidence they had weapons.

I don't care whether they had weapons or not. In examining the actions of the crew, you must examine the actions they took with the information available to them. The best information available was that they appeared armed and traveling together in a war zone in close proximity to US ground forces in an area where guerrilla attacks by groups of such description are quite common.

We already know a camera was mistaken for a rpg.

So the information somehow travels back in time so the gun crew knows that it's a camera?

If a man shoots a masked man in his house at night because he has a knife in his hand and is standing over hi,, is he just?

Now it turns out that it was his brother and it was actually a pie cutter and he was about to surprise him with a birthday party.

Do the man's actions somehow become unjust and inexcusable or must they be considered in light of what information was available to the man at the time?

Wow.....not too bright eh? You can't have insurgents in a country where a foreign military invaded, overthrew the government, used that military to install a new government (in this case an Islamic Theocracy), and continues to occupy that nation. If Russia invaded the US would you consider yourself an insurgent in fighting back?


You say you don't care whether they had weapons or not but earlier you were demanding an explanation for shooting the van based on.........they didn't have weapons. Got consistency?


My point on the rpg was misunderstood. I was saying they only identified one rpg prior to shooting. We now know the camera was mistaken for the rpg so we know they did not have an rpg.

Your claims about their presence as an indicator of a threat is pretty laughable. Look at the video genius. They were casually walking around in very wide open spaces and making no tactical moves.

Have you or anyone found out who they were or do you automatically label them as bad on the sole basis they were killed?

 

[CurveLight]

From the time we invaded iraq there have never been insurgents. Do you know what the definition is or have you allowed the MSM to sell you a dishonest term?

Wow.

No wonder you are so confused.

Coming from you I'm flattered. Did you ever once stop to look up the meaning of that word or did you simply accept the spoon fed bowlshit? It automatically tries to demonize any iraqi that fought our invasion. If we were invaded would you just bow down to the invading forces or fight back? For the moment let's say you actually have courage and you would fight back. Would you see yourself as an insurgent or someone defending your home?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

My point on the rpg was misunderstood. I was saying they only identified one rpg prior to shooting. We now know the camera was mistaken for the rpg so we know they did not have an rpg.

Who is we....you and one of your multiple personalities? It was CLEARLY stated in the after action report that an RPG WAS FOUND on one of the dead terrorists.

You should really try to post facts instead of distortions, lies and code pink crap.

 

[CurveLight]

My point on the rpg was misunderstood. I was saying they only identified one rpg prior to shooting. We now know the camera was mistaken for the rpg so we know they did not have an rpg.

Who is we....you and one of your multiple personalities? It was CLEARLY stated in the after action report that an RPG WAS FOUND on one of the dead terrorists.

You should really try to post facts instead of distortions, lies and code pink crap.

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

My point on the rpg was misunderstood. I was saying they only identified one rpg prior to shooting. We now know the camera was mistaken for the rpg so we know they did not have an rpg.

Who is we....you and one of your multiple personalities? It was CLEARLY stated in the after action report that an RPG WAS FOUND on one of the dead terrorists.

You should really try to post facts instead of distortions, lies and code pink crap.

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Ya....right. Choose an onsite, up close and personal survey of the area of engagement which found weapons and an rpg launcher over a grainy video that turned out to be correct.....yep...I'll take the after action report any day.

You see....when our soldiers see grainy video day after day after day it's easier to understand what shapes and shadows represent. You on the other hand, being a Code Pink anti-military type, aren't qualified to do anything other than shine my boots compared to our extremely professional soldiers.

 

[CurveLight]

Who is we....you and one of your multiple personalities? It was CLEARLY stated in the after action report that an RPG WAS FOUND on one of the dead terrorists.

You should really try to post facts instead of distortions, lies and code pink crap.

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Ya....right. Choose an onsite, up close and personal survey of the area of engagement which found weapons and an rpg launcher over a grainy video that turned out to be correct.....yep...I'll take the after action report any day.

You see....when our soldiers see grainy video day after day after day it's easier to understand what shapes and shadows represent. You on the other hand, being a Code Pink anti-military type, aren't qualified to do anything other than shine my boots compared to our extremely professional soldiers.

That's what I thought. You have nothing but crimson quality jabs.

 

[geauxtohell]

Who is we....you and one of your multiple personalities? It was CLEARLY stated in the after action report that an RPG WAS FOUND on one of the dead terrorists.

He hasn't bothered to read any of the 15-6 reports. That's why he is so confused.

 

[geauxtohell]

Coming from you I'm flattered. Did you ever once stop to look up the meaning of that word or did you simply accept the spoon fed bowlshit? It automatically tries to demonize any iraqi that fought our invasion. If we were invaded would you just bow down to the invading forces or fight back? For the moment let's say you actually have courage and you would fight back. Would you see yourself as an insurgent or someone defending your home?

Wow, so not are you a master of all things tactical, but you also command the power to change the english language at will.

I don't find the term "insurgent" to be perjorative. I find the term "terrorist" to be so. I don't assume every iraqi fighting against us is a "terrorist", but they utilize insurgent tactics so they are an insurgent.

I don't really see any ******* distinction between the two in your last sentence.

 

[geauxtohell]

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Are you so "fuxxing" stupid that you are going to split hairs over subjective interpretation of a cylinder object pointed at American forces on a black and white video from multiple different sets of eyes versus the official Army investigation?

Or do you just choose to ignore the Army reports because they are inconvenient to your position?

Let me guess, you are ignoring the official Army documentation because it's all a "cover-up". Right?

 

[CurveLight]

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Are you so "fuxxing" stupid that you are going to split hairs over subjective interpretation of a cylinder object pointed at American forces on a black and white video from multiple different sets of eyes versus the official Army investigation?

Or do you just choose to ignore the Army reports because they are inconvenient to your position?

Let me guess, you are ignoring the official Army documentation because it's all a "cover-up". Right?

You're such a fuxxing whiner. You have the actual video showing what happened but you prefer to ignore the real time facts and point only to a report. I haven't ignored any reports...I'm pointing out they don't line up with the a/v facts in front of our faces.

 

[JWBooth]

Unconscionable

 

[RadiomanATL]

Finally! Okay, my apologies for my misunderstanding. There are some problems with the claim. Gawker says 30 minutes is missing while jawa says 20. While I've tried I cannot clearly see the time stamp on the video. How does this system work? Is it Zulu? Mission? Looped? Jawa is claiming the segment was purposefully edited but with no evidence. From all available evidence the 38 minute version is all the contents leaked from the Pentagon so wiki has not edited. Jawa plucks a sworn statement and claims that was cut out from the video....but has absolutely no evidence the statement fits with the missing 20 minutes....if 20 minutes is actually missing. Jawa is a fuxxing joke of a source.....it's the extreme Right version of prison planet and is clearly partisan driven. These bozos make claims without anything to back it up.

Unfortunately the constant harping of "edited" versions all send the same message: your ilk is looking for justification because if what the available video shows exonerates the pilots then an edited version would be irrelevant. You can't have it both ways. You know the video shows an abuse of power and that is why you guys are desperately searching for different versions.

Unlike you, I admit my errors and rely on valid information so no wonder you are constantly whining about me. Maybe one day you too can learn to admit mistakes.....but I doubt it.

Just a minute ago you said that you made a mistake and that I was correct.

Now you say I haven't proven the claim.

Do you even realize how much of a moran you look like? Every damn person in this thread, from the left, right, middle, anti-war and pro war have stomped mudholes in your ass, and all you do is stick your fingers in your ears and go "NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA I can't hear yoooooo", and the zoom off on another wild tangent to try and distract everyone from the beating you've taken.

You know what your main problem is? You just can't help yourself and HAVE to respond, which makes it so much easier for everyone on here to keep putting your dick in the dirt.

I admitted I made a mistake by misunderstanding what you were claiming. I thought you were saying there is footage of the video actually available but all you are claiming is the jackasses at jawa have proven 20 minutes is missing. I clearly explained it but twice your cowardly **** skank ass edited my post when you quoted specifically to remove that part to try avoiding addressing it. Ignore it again ****.

One more time you dumb shit...

THE VIDEO ITSELF, WITH IT'S TIME STAMPS IS THE PROOF THAT AROUND 20 MINUTES IS MISSING.

I have said this at least three times in plain English, but you keep ignoring it. LOL. And the accusing others of ignoring a something that no one was arguing against in the first place.

You

Are

*******

Looney

Tunes.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Are you so "fuxxing" stupid that you are going to split hairs over subjective interpretation of a cylinder object pointed at American forces on a black and white video from multiple different sets of eyes versus the official Army investigation?

Or do you just choose to ignore the Army reports because they are inconvenient to your position?

Let me guess, you are ignoring the official Army documentation because it's all a "cover-up". Right?

You're such a fuxxing whiner. You have the actual video showing what happened but you prefer to ignore the real time facts and point only to a report. I haven't ignored any reports...I'm pointing out they don't line up with the a/v facts in front of our faces.

Better check your six again...your about to get shot down!!!!

The report and the video DO IN FACT match up...that's why there are ZERO charges filed against ANYONE!!

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Just a minute ago you said that you made a mistake and that I was correct.

Now you say I haven't proven the claim.

Do you even realize how much of a moran you look like? Every damn person in this thread, from the left, right, middle, anti-war and pro war have stomped mudholes in your ass, and all you do is stick your fingers in your ears and go "NA-NA-NA-NA-NA-NA I can't hear yoooooo", and the zoom off on another wild tangent to try and distract everyone from the beating you've taken.

You know what your main problem is? You just can't help yourself and HAVE to respond, which makes it so much easier for everyone on here to keep putting your dick in the dirt.

I admitted I made a mistake by misunderstanding what you were claiming. I thought you were saying there is footage of the video actually available but all you are claiming is the jackasses at jawa have proven 20 minutes is missing. I clearly explained it but twice your cowardly **** skank ass edited my post when you quoted specifically to remove that part to try avoiding addressing it. Ignore it again ****.

One more time you dumb shit...

THE VIDEO ITSELF, WITH IT'S TIME STAMPS IS THE PROOF THAT AROUND 20 MINUTES IS MISSING.

I have said this at least three times in plain English, but you keep ignoring it. LOL. And the accusing others of ignoring a something that no one was arguing against in the first place.

You

Are

*******

Looney

Tunes.

Some people just like any attention....be it negative or positive. It's becoming increasingly clear that CurveLight is all alone in the world and uses the internet as the nexus of her interaction with what she deems normal society. I bet she has an anxiety disorder, feels uncomfortable interacting with live humans and is more than likely on some sort of psychiatric drug...sad indeed....but on the bright side at least she's not out doing a "Thelma and Louise" on society. At least she has an outlet for her pent up rage.

 

[geauxtohell]

Show us the other rpg in the video. Or are you so fuxxing stoopid you would choose a report over actual video evidence?

Are you so "fuxxing" stupid that you are going to split hairs over subjective interpretation of a cylinder object pointed at American forces on a black and white video from multiple different sets of eyes versus the official Army investigation?

Or do you just choose to ignore the Army reports because they are inconvenient to your position?

Let me guess, you are ignoring the official Army documentation because it's all a "cover-up". Right?

You're such a fuxxing whiner. You have the actual video showing what happened but you prefer to ignore the real time facts and point only to a report. I haven't ignored any reports...I'm pointing out they don't line up with the a/v facts in front of our faces.

The real time facts include the situation on the ground, which you are desperately trying to ignore.

If you want to just get enraged about the video, then whatever, but there is a fact pattern that is germane to why the people on the ground were engaged.

So, if you aren't ignoring the 15-6, what is your opinion of the matter?

 

[geauxtohell]

Unconscionable

War is unconscionable. Why do you guys act surprised about that?

BTW, speaking of, why are you such a fan of John Wilkes Booth. An assassin?