Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children


We've all seen the videos of the selected assholes, and every time I see them I ask, Where the hell was their Sergeant. Hopefully the idiots have been identified and have faced justice for their stupidity in all these cases. I know that several of them have been charged.

But you assholes want the world to believe that this is the norm. And you know damn well it's not.

God Bless America?

Damned right.
 
I saw AK's in the video. they were not unarmed.


State the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

As you cling to your asinine, and wrong, position that a unit has to be taking fire before they can engage...............


Quote the post where I said a unit "has to be taking fire" before they can engage. This oughta be fun.....
 

we've all seen the videos of the selected assholes, and every time i see them i ask, where the hell was their sergeant. Hopefully the idiots have been identified and have faced justice for their stupidity in all these cases. I know that several of them have been charged.

But you assholes want the world to believe that this is the norm. And you know damn well it's not.

God bless america?

Damned right.

good soliders are not the concern
 
I saw AK's in the video. they were not unarmed.


State the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

Ah the van...I see, no I didn't see any weapons around the van. I did see adults attempting to remove a person believed to be a wounded enemy combatant. With no idea if they were armed or were attempting to pick up arms from the battlefield. Again the pilots fired because they had cause. Not that I would want to have to make that decision.


They had cause to fire because unarmed people tried helping unarmed people? You can hear a pilot beg for someone to pick up a weapon so what "cause" are you referencing?
 
☭proletarian☭;2204591 said:
☭proletarian☭;2203186 said:
You've evidence of this claim?

What heavily armed group? It was two guys in a van.

Obviously you missed the first part of the video showing the group of men with their AK47's and RPG launcher and the part where they were shredded by 30mm cannon fire. At which point the 2 observers and their children came in to pick up the several hundred body parts for a proper Muslim burial and then they themselves came under devastating fire...thus ushering them on to their supposed paradise.

So you admit that the people in the van, who happened by later, were not arm and posed no threat?

They didn't just happen by....they knew the terrorists who were giving an interview to those reporters then after their bodies were holed by 1 1/4 inch diameter exploding projectiles their unfortunate friend/relatives became one with them in paradise.
 
What kind of fantasy do you live in to claim my argument was destroyed with facts you fuxxing *****? The video proves the slaughter was avoidable. It proves innocent UNARMED people were killed and wounded.

My argument has not changed. It is your spin that makes you so damn dizzy. Ie:

What the **** does your "savage" comment have to do with anything? It was an unarmed man trying to help another unarmed man who just got shot!

I saw AK's in the video. they were not unarmed.


State the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

Excellent shooting by the extremely professional Warrant Officer pilot and Weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a FREE FIRE zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.
 
☭proletarian☭;2204591 said:
Obviously you missed the first part of the video showing the group of men with their AK47's and RPG launcher and the part where they were shredded by 30mm cannon fire. At which point the 2 observers and their children came in to pick up the several hundred body parts for a proper Muslim burial and then they themselves came under devastating fire...thus ushering them on to their supposed paradise.

So you admit that the people in the van, who happened by later, were not arm and posed no threat?

They didn't just happen by....they knew the terrorists who were giving an interview to those reporters then after their bodies were holed by 1 1/4 inch diameter exploding projectiles their unfortunate friend/relatives became one with them in paradise.


You know this.....how? You don't. Iz prolly some bowlshit you read off a blog and you want to claim it as fact.
 
I saw AK's in the video. they were not unarmed.


State the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

Excellent shooting by the extremely professional Warrant Officer pilot and Weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a FREE FIRE zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

Your sickness actually transforms a bloody slaughter into your own personal pornography funhouse.
 
State the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

Excellent shooting by the extremely professional Warrant Officer pilot and Weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a FREE FIRE zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

Your sickness actually transforms a bloody slaughter into your own personal pornography funhouse.

Just as your utter stupidity and ignorance relegates you to the bottom rung of society's ladder.
 
☭proletarian☭;2204591 said:
Obviously you missed the first part of the video showing the group of men with their AK47's and RPG launcher and the part where they were shredded by 30mm cannon fire. At which point the 2 observers and their children came in to pick up the several hundred body parts for a proper Muslim burial and then they themselves came under devastating fire...thus ushering them on to their supposed paradise.

So you admit that the people in the van, who happened by later, were not arm and posed no threat?

They didn't just happen by....they knew the terrorists who were giving an interview to those reporters then after their bodies were holed by 1 1/4 inch diameter exploding projectiles their unfortunate friend/relatives became one with them in paradise.
What evidence do you have that the men who shot them had any reason to believe they knew the wounded man and posed any threat or were enemy combatants?
 
i saw ak's in the video. They were not unarmed.


state the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

excellent shooting by the extremely professional warrant officer pilot and weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a free fire zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do
 
Rotfl! The military cannot locate the video but jawa report can? How the fuk do nut licking jackasses like you even pretend to debate politics with any fictional version of sincerity?
Http://www.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100407/ap_on_go_ot/us_us_iraq_video

What I am pointing out is you are screaming about a video from one of the most biased blogs on the net but you don't question it's authenticity because you like what you see. You're no different than troofers who quote alex jones as rock solid proof explosives were used on the towers.

When you have a credible source and/or independent verification of the video let us know but don't expect everyone else to fall for your gawking bullshit.

Having problems with comprehension?

The proof is the video itself you stupid shit.

That must be why credible sources are reporting on it. Shiggles! That hasn't happened.

Where did jawa get the video? The saddest part of that question is you can't answer without research because you didn't even ask yourself that fundamental question.


HeyZEUS you are one stupid shit.

Jawa just looked at the exact same video that was posted and said "Hey, anyone notice the timecode discrepancy yet?"

What is this...3 posts...4? Showing that you are too dumb to accept the evidence that Wiki itself posted.

But go ahead denying that a discrepancy exists...just makes you look dumber and dumber by the post. Either that or you realize that the evidence is undeniable, so you just choose to completely ignore it.

Your choice. Either you are stupid, or you are just flat out ignoring it.

I'm voting for a combination of both.
 
state the exact time you see anyone getting out of the van with a weapon. You are also ignoring the fact that after the apaches opened fire they did not receive any return fire and neither did the ground unit. There is no reasonable explanation why the apaches kept firing after the first time. They did it because they could. Period.

excellent shooting by the extremely professional warrant officer pilot and weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a free fire zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do

This comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.
 
excellent shooting by the extremely professional warrant officer pilot and weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a free fire zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do

this comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.

truth hurts

Military Training Is Just a Game
Associated Press 10.03.03




Hunched with his troops in a dusty, wind-swept courtyard, the squad leader signals the soldiers to line up against a wall. Clasping automatic weapons, they inch single-file toward a sandy road lined with swaying palm trees.

The squad leader orders a point man to peer around the corner, his quick glance revealing several foes lying in wait behind a smoldering car. A few hand signals, a quick flash of gunfire, and it's over.

The enemy is defeated, but no blood is spilled, no bullet casings spent: All the action is in an upcoming Xbox-based training simulator for the military, called Full Spectrum Warrior.

Increasingly, the Pentagon is joining forces with the video-game industry to train and recruit soldiers. The Army considers such simulators vital for recruits who've been weaned on shoot'em-up games.

http://www.wired.com/gaming/gamingreviews/news/2003/10/60688
 
Last edited:
15th post
nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do

this comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.

truth hurts

Military Training Is Just a Game
Associated Press 10.03.03




Hunched with his troops in a dusty, wind-swept courtyard, the squad leader signals the soldiers to line up against a wall. Clasping automatic weapons, they inch single-file toward a sandy road lined with swaying palm trees.

The squad leader orders a point man to peer around the corner, his quick glance revealing several foes lying in wait behind a smoldering car. A few hand signals, a quick flash of gunfire, and it's over.

The enemy is defeated, but no blood is spilled, no bullet casings spent: All the action is in an upcoming Xbox-based training simulator for the military, called Full Spectrum Warrior.

Increasingly, the Pentagon is joining forces with the video-game industry to train and recruit soldiers. The Army considers such simulators vital for recruits who've been weaned on shoot'em-up games.

Military Training Is Just a Game

Yeah. Because a combat simulator is the same as Call of Duty on Xbox. :doubt:
 
this comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.

truth hurts

Military Training Is Just a Game
Associated Press 10.03.03




Hunched with his troops in a dusty, wind-swept courtyard, the squad leader signals the soldiers to line up against a wall. Clasping automatic weapons, they inch single-file toward a sandy road lined with swaying palm trees.

The squad leader orders a point man to peer around the corner, his quick glance revealing several foes lying in wait behind a smoldering car. A few hand signals, a quick flash of gunfire, and it's over.

The enemy is defeated, but no blood is spilled, no bullet casings spent: All the action is in an upcoming Xbox-based training simulator for the military, called Full Spectrum Warrior.

Increasingly, the Pentagon is joining forces with the video-game industry to train and recruit soldiers. The Army considers such simulators vital for recruits who've been weaned on shoot'em-up games.

Military Training Is Just a Game

Yeah. Because a combat simulator is the same as Call of Duty on Xbox. :doubt:
Full Spectrum Warrior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Download Full Spectrum Warrior
 
excellent shooting by the extremely professional warrant officer pilot and weapo prevented any return fire....plus....when you're in a free fire zone anything that moves is subjected to come under fire for cause as determined by the pilot and the weapo....they are outstanding shots by the way....as evidenced by the plethora of body parts strewn over the field of battle. War sucks...especially when you are on the losing side.

nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do

This comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.

Then the scumbag eots negged me for that post...and had the gall to call me a loser...BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA eots must be one of those code pink psychos...:cuckoo::lol:
 
nothing any 12 yr old idiot child raised on video games couldn't do

This comment speaks volumes about you and your ilk.

Then the scumbag eots negged me for that post...and had the gall to call me a loser...BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA eots must be one of those code pink psychos...:cuckoo::lol:

:lol:

No worries. Nobody with a functioning braincell takes seriously anything said or done by id-eots.
 
Back
Top Bottom