Wikileak'd video shows eager-to-kill troops firing on Reuters reporters and children

I never said I never had to forward deploy you whiny skank. Face it. You're so fuxxing immature you desperately keep searching for some minutia to ***** about. You're so fuxxing arrogant you want to accuse me of lying simply because I pwn you on a regular basis and there isn't a damn thing you can do but ***** and moan like the dyed in the wool skank you keep proving to be. Do you really think you are informed or wise enough to use divine powers to know my experiences in iraq? (rhetorical as your arrogance has already answered)

:banghead: Jesus Christ you are retarded.


Thass light years ahead of being CrimsonWhite. Which reminds me....did you ever prove the claim about the longer version radioasswipe spoke of? Or are you such a hypocrite you accept a source as fuxxed up as gawker when it suits your needs?

Since you whined so much about the edited video in the op will you please show us what is found in the 39 minute version that changes anything?

Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.
 
☭proletarian☭;2199312 said:
Per the 15-6 it was legitimate engagement because it was perceived as trying to remove weapons from the scene.
We saw them pick up a man. Please give me the time in the video where they approach or attempt to retrieve any weapons.

Again, it's what the pilots perceived. Other than that, you can read the 15-6 to see their feelings on the matter.
If the link was posted, I missed it.

Do you have it?

My complaint remains that the van was not a threat and did not appear hostile.
 
The latest story regarding this.

Last week it released the cockpit recording from an American Apache helicopter as it killed Iraqi civilians, including a Reuters photographer, in Baghdad in 2007.

Activists behind a website dedicated to revealing secret documents have complained of harassment by police and intelligence services as they prepare to release a video showing an American attack in which 97 civilians were killed in Afghanistan

Whistleblowers on US ‘massacre’ fear CIA stalkers - Times Online
 
:banghead: Jesus Christ you are retarded.


Thass light years ahead of being CrimsonWhite. Which reminds me....did you ever prove the claim about the longer version radioasswipe spoke of? Or are you such a hypocrite you accept a source as fuxxed up as gawker when it suits your needs?

Since you whined so much about the edited video in the op will you please show us what is found in the 39 minute version that changes anything?

Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.
 
Thass light years ahead of being CrimsonWhite. Which reminds me....did you ever prove the claim about the longer version radioasswipe spoke of? Or are you such a hypocrite you accept a source as fuxxed up as gawker when it suits your needs?

Since you whined so much about the edited video in the op will you please show us what is found in the 39 minute version that changes anything?

Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

So instead, we are supposed to take the word of a known lying ***** like you?

**** you, asshole.

You may not grasp it yet, scumbag, but you have no credibility whatsofucking ever.

The reason nobody can discuss an issue honestly with you is because you are incapable of being honest.
 
Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

So instead, we are supposed to take the word of a known lying ***** like you?

**** you, asshole.

You may not grasp it yet, scumbag, but you have no credibility whatsofucking ever.

The reason nobody can discuss an issue honestly with you is because you are incapable of being honest.


Show us all in my post you quoted where I asked anyone to take my word for it Snitch *****. You can't. Unlike you and some other punks I admit when I make an error but bitches like you tap dance down to your kneecaps.

I also don't give a fuk if some whiny ***** on a board think I have credibility or not. If someone like you gave me a pat on the back that would be a neon sign I'm going in the wrong direction. I support my claims with facts so I don't need to ask anyone to take my word for it.

This thread is a great example of the cancer of Nationalism. If that video showed Iranian troops doing the same thing in Israel you fuksticks would be screaming bloody murder. Hypocrites.
 
☭proletarian☭;2199655 said:
☭proletarian☭;2199312 said:
We saw them pick up a man. Please give me the time in the video where they approach or attempt to retrieve any weapons.

Again, it's what the pilots perceived. Other than that, you can read the 15-6 to see their feelings on the matter.
If the link was posted, I missed it.

Do you have it?

My complaint remains that the van was not a threat and did not appear hostile.

5--1st Air Cavalry Brigade AR 15-6 Investigation

You can hunt around and find the CENTCOM portal where the other 15-6 over this was conducted as well as sworn statements.
 
Thass light years ahead of being CrimsonWhite. Which reminds me....did you ever prove the claim about the longer version radioasswipe spoke of? Or are you such a hypocrite you accept a source as fuxxed up as gawker when it suits your needs?

Since you whined so much about the edited video in the op will you please show us what is found in the 39 minute version that changes anything?

Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

The proof is the video itself you dumb shit.

Time code says something...fades to black...then video comes back and the time code says approximately 30 minutes have elapsed. Which were not shown.

But you go ahead and continue whining about Gawker and Jawa and trying to discredit them. It just makes you look even dumber for not realizing that the evidence has been in front of your ******* face the whole time :thup:
 
Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

The proof is the video itself you dumb shit.

Time code says something...fades to black...then video comes back and the time code says approximately 30 minutes have elapsed. Which were not shown.

But you go ahead and continue whining about Gawker and Jawa and trying to discredit them. It just makes you look even dumber for not realizing that the evidence has been in front of your ******* face the whole time :thup:


Rotfl! The military cannot locate the video but jawa report can? How the fuk do nut licking jackasses like you even pretend to debate politics with any fictional version of sincerity?
Http://www.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100407/ap_on_go_ot/us_us_iraq_video

What I am pointing out is you are screaming about a video from one of the most biased blogs on the net but you don't question it's authenticity because you like what you see. You're no different than troofers who quote alex jones as rock solid proof explosives were used on the towers.

When you have a credible source and/or independent verification of the video let us know but don't expect everyone else to fall for your gawking bullshit.
 
Infantry identified an RPG and RadiomanATL posted the link proving that their is an even longer version. But you go ahead and ignore facts. I'll stay over here in reality. And I am done with this ******* thread.


Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

The proof is the video itself you dumb shit.

Time code says something...fades to black...then video comes back and the time code says approximately 30 minutes have elapsed. Which were not shown.

But you go ahead and continue whining about Gawker and Jawa and trying to discredit them. It just makes you look even dumber for not realizing that the evidence has been in front of your ******* face the whole time :thup:

I guess I'm going to have to take Id-eots and bentlight off ignore. they are getting rather entertaining in a stupid twisted sort of way.
 
Hello, is that you in your avatar, if I may ask and what are your doing! I like the picture!
 
Hello, is that you in your avatar, if I may ask and what are your doing! I like the picture!

If you are talking to me, that picture was taken last Memorial Day. I was in my American Legion posts Memorial Ceremony where we were doing the 21 gun salute. We do 2 Ceremonies each year in two local cemeteries.
 
Show us where that was cut out. Or have you run like the whiny brat code you live by? Then you cite radioasswipe's bullshit claim? His source is the jawa report via the gawker.....and you find that as reliable? The fuxxing jawa report! Rotfl! You fuxxing ***** are pure entertainment and the belly laughter bells harder realizing you actually take yourselves seriously......


For all your whining you got bullshit claims you can't support so all you can do is use the rep button to try and compensate for y
our inability to discuss an issue honestly. Rotfl.

The proof is the video itself you dumb shit.

Time code says something...fades to black...then video comes back and the time code says approximately 30 minutes have elapsed. Which were not shown.

But you go ahead and continue whining about Gawker and Jawa and trying to discredit them. It just makes you look even dumber for not realizing that the evidence has been in front of your ******* face the whole time :thup:


Rotfl! The military cannot locate the video but jawa report can? How the fuk do nut licking jackasses like you even pretend to debate politics with any fictional version of sincerity?
Http://www.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100407/ap_on_go_ot/us_us_iraq_video

What I am pointing out is you are screaming about a video from one of the most biased blogs on the net but you don't question it's authenticity because you like what you see. You're no different than troofers who quote alex jones as rock solid proof explosives were used on the towers.

When you have a credible source and/or independent verification of the video let us know but don't expect everyone else to fall for your gawking bullshit.

Having problems with comprehension?

The proof is the video itself you stupid shit.
 
The proof is the video itself you dumb shit.

Time code says something...fades to black...then video comes back and the time code says approximately 30 minutes have elapsed. Which were not shown.

But you go ahead and continue whining about Gawker and Jawa and trying to discredit them. It just makes you look even dumber for not realizing that the evidence has been in front of your ******* face the whole time :thup:


Rotfl! The military cannot locate the video but jawa report can? How the fuk do nut licking jackasses like you even pretend to debate politics with any fictional version of sincerity?
Http://www.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100407/ap_on_go_ot/us_us_iraq_video

What I am pointing out is you are screaming about a video from one of the most biased blogs on the net but you don't question it's authenticity because you like what you see. You're no different than troofers who quote alex jones as rock solid proof explosives were used on the towers.

When you have a credible source and/or independent verification of the video let us know but don't expect everyone else to fall for your gawking bullshit.

Having problems with comprehension?

The proof is the video itself you stupid shit.

That must be why credible sources are reporting on it. Shiggles! That hasn't happened.

Where did jawa get the video? The saddest part of that question is you can't answer without research because you didn't even ask yourself that fundamental question.
 
☭proletarian☭;2197043 said:
....

Am I the only one whose complaint still lies with the actions taken after the van showed up, clearly aiding an injured man and not appearing armed or otherwise a threat at the time it was fired upon? How did everyone end up arguing about the events prior?

Yes you are. Especially when you don't take issue with the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists who were filmed with weapons in hand and were using their children as human shields hoping the Americans wouldn't fire on the heavily armed group.
 
the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists


You've evidence of this claim?

What heavily armed group? It was two guys in a van.
 
15th post
☭proletarian☭;2197043 said:
....

Am I the only one whose complaint still lies with the actions taken after the van showed up, clearly aiding an injured man and not appearing armed or otherwise a threat at the time it was fired upon? How did everyone end up arguing about the events prior?

Yes you are. Especially when you don't take issue with the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists who were filmed with weapons in hand and were using their children as human shields hoping the Americans wouldn't fire on the heavily armed group.


Lol.....is this a rusty audition for staff at freeper or hannityforums? It's impossible to take punks like you seriously.
 
☭proletarian☭;2203186 said:
the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists


You've evidence of this claim?

What heavily armed group? It was two guys in a van.

Obviously you missed the first part of the video showing the group of men with their AK47's and RPG launcher and the part where they were shredded by 30mm cannon fire. At which point the 2 observers and their children came in to pick up the several hundred body parts for a proper Muslim burial and then they themselves came under devastating fire...thus ushering them on to their supposed paradise.
 
☭proletarian☭;2197043 said:
....

Am I the only one whose complaint still lies with the actions taken after the van showed up, clearly aiding an injured man and not appearing armed or otherwise a threat at the time it was fired upon? How did everyone end up arguing about the events prior?

Yes you are. Especially when you don't take issue with the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists who were filmed with weapons in hand and were using their children as human shields hoping the Americans wouldn't fire on the heavily armed group.


Lol.....is this a rusty audition for staff at freeper or hannityforums? It's impossible to take punks like you seriously.

This coming from the laughing stock of the usmb.....thanks doofus.
 
☭proletarian☭;2203186 said:
the parents of those children who clearly were associated with those terrorists
You've evidence of this claim?

What heavily armed group? It was two guys in a van.

Obviously you missed the first part of the video showing the group of men with their AK47's and RPG launcher and the part where they were shredded by 30mm cannon fire. At which point the 2 observers and their children came in to pick up the several hundred body parts for a proper Muslim burial and then they themselves came under devastating fire...thus ushering them on to their supposed paradise.

So you admit that the people in the van, who happened by later, were not arm and posed no threat?
 
Back
Top Bottom