Well, China did kick out the WHO doctors that were there to observe, if memory serves me right.And with China's lies, they very well could be lies. They have been lying since last year regarding the virus.It's not a fucking court of law. China is a country that can't be trusted, even with this virus they lied to the world.Well, that and China's track record for honesty.The other aspect is that any numbers coming out of China are lies.
Because you saw it posted on a message board.
That rat that is incontrovertible evidence, that is.
It ain't much of a record, either recently or farther back.
But the fact remains, the poster has no evidence that "the numbers coming out of China are lies". When he does he can make that point. Simple question of proving one's case with evidence
Sheesh, Pogo, you're a better fit there than here.
Where, in a court of law? You may be right.
There's no law issue here however. It's again, simple logic. If you make an assertion, you have the burden of proof. It's ALWAYS on the asserter. Period, Full Stop.
And again --- the assertion wasn't whether China "lied to the world". It was that "the numbers coming out of China are lies". That's present tense.
You just don't seem to want to believe it.
I'm perfectly willing to believe it. I've denounced how they handled it already, it would follow.
But I'm not seeing EVIDENCE.
Are we not clear on what the word "evidence" means?
Hard to collect solid evidence one way or the other, but does raise up the skepticism flag