CDZ Why wouldn't China attack the U.S. in a first strike?

You've proven nothing aside from a penchant for personal insults.

I've explained why neither the U.S. nor anyone else ever had a "launch on warning" policy and the fact that both sides were intensely interested in the survivability of their ICBMs in case of a nuclear attack.

If they did have a "launch on warning" or "launch under attack" posture there would've been no need to spend so much on ICBM survivability because the ICBM silos would've been empty when the nuclear first strike arrived.

You've never been able to answer that so I guess we can assume you cannot.

Thank you. Concessions accepted.

Though not expected.
That is the idea!

Missiles launched after a first strike could be damaged in their silos by a near miss and/or destroyed upon launch into an environment after an attack.

Also, Russian nukes targeted to the ICBM sites have the precision to destroy missiles in their silos.

Why don't you admit you know nothing about nuclear weapons or our policies regarding their employment?

Continuing the discussion only makes you look more ignorant!
 
Last edited:
That is the fucking idea, you GD moron!

Missiles launched after a first strike could be damaged in their silos by a near miss and/or destroyed upon launch into an environment after an attack.

Also, Russian nukes targeted to the ICBM sites have the precision to destroy missiles in their silos.

Why don't you admit you know nothing about nuclear weapons or our policies regarding their employment?

Continuing the discussion only makes you look like the complete moron you are!
and what expertise do you have regarding nuclear weapons?
 
and what expertise do you have regarding nuclear weapons?
Well, let's see!

I was a nuclear weapons officer in the Navy. I was a missile engagement controller and ASW evaluator which dealt with nuclear weapons. I am a graduate of TAO school which actually launches nuclear weapons. I was in the PRP programs required of all nuclear trained personnel.
 
Well, let's see!

I was a nuclear weapons officer in the Navy. I was a missile engagement controller and ASW evaluator which dealt with nuclear weapons. I am a graduate of TAO school which actually launches nuclear weapons. I was in the PRP programs required of all nuclear trained personnel.

That doesn't mean anything regarding strategic nuclear weapons and you know it.
 
Well, let's see!

I was a nuclear weapons officer in the Navy. I was a missile engagement controller and ASW evaluator which dealt with nuclear weapons. I am a graduate of TAO school which actually launches nuclear weapons. I was in the PRP programs required of all nuclear trained personnel.

Interesting.

Which of those taught you to rudely insult people during discussions?
 
In other words, you don't know anything about the topic with any personal experience.
Most knowledge is NOT gained through personal experience. We go to school. We read. We learn.

Most of your "knowledge" of nuclear weapons was gained the same way because I'm absolutely certain you never launched a nuclear weapon.
 
And wipe out their best customer? It would be just about the dumbest thing ever...the only thing dumber would be their penning a 2nd Amendment and inviting the genocide that the OP is so proud of.
They communists first and foremost. The idea they are worried about customer service over regional domination is laughable.
 
You mean the same resources that will be destroyed or covered by nuclear fallout?

I challenge you to think for once.... I promise it won't hurt.
The Chinese, like all socialist regimes have proven they do not give a shit how many of their own people they kill. They will throw bodies at the problem until they get what they want.

By the way I could think as slow as you no matter how hard I tried.
 
When you engage in a multi target attack you hit the strongest and most threatening target first.

Doing so allows you to be at full strength for your hardest target. When you then engage other targets any backup will be diminished because your toughest opponent is out of the picture already. It's a show of strength that weakens the morale of other opponents because they see you mean business and aren't playing games. It also causes pause in other enemies and allows you brief window before they respond.

They wouldn't even need to destroy us. Just crippling us to the point of being ineffective would be sufficient.

Then again with the Biden administration we aren't exactly the biggest guy on the playground anymore. We used to be, but we're less of a potential threat than we used to be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top