Why would anyone object to Virginia’s new gun laws?

[The Purge]

Sensible legislation

Virginia gun laws: What sparked Richmond gun rally tied to neo-Nazis?

Three bills passed the state Senate on Thursday: A limit to one handgun purchase per month, a requirement for universal background checks on gun sales and a rule allowing localities to ban guns in some public areas.

To go along with Va. Taking away OUR RIGHTS. I think we should also BAN leftwinger here from formenting possible violence between left wing anarchist and true American patriots that understand that if you continue to let former BLACK FACE AND KKK HAT WEARERS that are people like this Va. Governor to govern and take away our rights, his RIGHTS will also be infringed on sooner than later!

 

[Jarlaxle]

Government has a right to regulate commerce

You make a practice of selling guns to criminals, government has a right to know

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

It's the private sales with no documentation or checks that make guns available to criminals.

Which is exactly what they are fighting against

Restricting handgun sales to one a month will cut down on straw buyers selling to criminals
So will mandatory background checks on ALL sales

Liar.

Actually it will

Why do you fight for criminals having guns?

Why do you lie about other people?

 

[Jarlaxle]

Government has a right to regulate commerce

You make a practice of selling guns to criminals, government has a right to know

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

It's the private sales with no documentation or checks that make guns available to criminals.

Which is exactly what they are fighting against

Restricting handgun sales to one a month will cut down on straw buyers selling to criminals
So will mandatory background checks on ALL sales

Liar.

So you're able to account for every private sale in the US?

ARe you on some sort of drugs?

 

[Hum Dinger]

Lets agree...

You should not be allowed to buy gun until you show membership to a 'well regulated militia'....

I presume this Militia will be registered with the Government be it Local, State or Fed... Constitution doesn't say that.

Now if it is well regulated it would have a registry of all the guns in their militia.

So it is up to the Government to up hold the law and make sure the US Citizen is part of Well Regulated Militia and a Well Regulated Militia would register guns... And that is the constitution...

“The right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms...”

“The right of THE PEOPLE to keep and bear arms...”

None of those laws infringe on that right in any way.

NYC makes me wait 3-6 months and pay $500 in fees just to keep a handgun in my apartment. how is that not infringement?

Somebody in the NYC government probably read some of your posts...

It's entirely reasonable to prevent mentally incompetent people from owning guns!

I guess you have no problem with the government bureaucrats deciding if you are mentally healthy or not.

No. I have no problem with healthcare professionals deciding if someone is mentally healthy or not.

But, I understand that you believe anyone who is educated and qualified is a bureaucrat and a member of the deep state.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I provided the best explanation of the second as it exists today under the law.

Read it or don't but reserve your bitching for those who make such rulings.

I didn't ask you about any explanation I asked what was written in the Constitution and you refuse to answer as ususal

Neither you nor I get to interpret constitutional amendments.

Actually we do, that's the whole part of being an active citizen in a constitutional republic.

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It seems more like you are the "peeing pansy type" who cant get your hands on a gun quick enough to feel safe.

I actually don't own a gun, but I refuse to give up my right to own one, and not go through hoops to get it.

Just like I have never had to use my rights to a speedy trial, to a trial by jury of my peers, to be secure from unwarranted searches, or not be cruelly and/or unusually punished, but I refuse to give up those rights either.

So it's really just a process argument then. Seems like that's all cons have anymore.

No, it's an argument regarding the fundamental right of a US Citizen to RKBA. It's about Gun Control types trying to hide unconstitutional controls behind the mantra of safety.

Your fundamental right to be armed is preserved.

No, it isn't. When It takes my 3-6 months and $500 just to keep a revolver in my apartment my right is infringed.

You still get the gun, dope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

Go after the criminals then. Stay away from law abiding citizens who do private sales.

It's the private sales with no documentation or checks that make guns available to criminals.

Which is exactly what they are fighting against

Restricting handgun sales to one a month will cut down on straw buyers selling to criminals
So will mandatory background checks on ALL sales

Liar.

So you're able to account for every private sale in the US?

ARe you on some sort of drugs?

Ate you unable or just unwilling to answer?

 

[rightwinger]

Good luck

Why don’t you work on repealing NYC gun laws

Get yourself a nice gun rally like they had today

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

They are working their way up to it. You keep arguing the how and not the why because you can't defend the why without looking like the gun grabbing zealot people on this board know you are.

The people of NYC have decided on the gun laws they want

They are safer for it

The people of Alabama want to ban abortions. Appealing to the masses works both ways.

Also those laws have been on the books for ages, and less than 50% of the people actually go out and vote. So appealing to the people is moot.

Finally, Rights don't require popular approval. I have the RKBA and I don't care if NYC doesn't like it.

They have already tried

Court said no

 

[martybegan]

I didn't ask you about any explanation I asked what was written in the Constitution and you refuse to answer as ususal

Neither you nor I get to interpret constitutional amendments.

Actually we do, that's the whole part of being an active citizen in a constitutional republic.

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

No, a sheep who thinks we work for government instead of the other way around.

 

[martybegan]

I actually don't own a gun, but I refuse to give up my right to own one, and not go through hoops to get it.

Just like I have never had to use my rights to a speedy trial, to a trial by jury of my peers, to be secure from unwarranted searches, or not be cruelly and/or unusually punished, but I refuse to give up those rights either.

So it's really just a process argument then. Seems like that's all cons have anymore.

No, it's an argument regarding the fundamental right of a US Citizen to RKBA. It's about Gun Control types trying to hide unconstitutional controls behind the mantra of safety.

Your fundamental right to be armed is preserved.

No, it isn't. When It takes my 3-6 months and $500 just to keep a revolver in my apartment my right is infringed.

You still get the gun, dope.

I'm still being infringed.

 

[martybegan]

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

They are working their way up to it. You keep arguing the how and not the why because you can't defend the why without looking like the gun grabbing zealot people on this board know you are.

The people of NYC have decided on the gun laws they want

They are safer for it

The people of Alabama want to ban abortions. Appealing to the masses works both ways.

Also those laws have been on the books for ages, and less than 50% of the people actually go out and vote. So appealing to the people is moot.

Finally, Rights don't require popular approval. I have the RKBA and I don't care if NYC doesn't like it.

They have already tried

Court said no

The Court is not God, despite what progressives want when the courts go their way.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Neither you nor I get to interpret constitutional amendments.

Actually we do, that's the whole part of being an active citizen in a constitutional republic.

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

No, a sheep who thinks we work for government instead of the other way around.

It's the job of SCOTUS to Define our laws according to the constitution. They have no obligation to take your tearful objections into consideration.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So it's really just a process argument then. Seems like that's all cons have anymore.

No, it's an argument regarding the fundamental right of a US Citizen to RKBA. It's about Gun Control types trying to hide unconstitutional controls behind the mantra of safety.

Your fundamental right to be armed is preserved.

No, it isn't. When It takes my 3-6 months and $500 just to keep a revolver in my apartment my right is infringed.

You still get the gun, dope.

I'm still being infringed.

No.
You're butthurt over the process.

 

[martybegan]

Actually we do, that's the whole part of being an active citizen in a constitutional republic.

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

No, a sheep who thinks we work for government instead of the other way around.

It's the job of SCOTUS to Define our laws according to the constitution. They have no obligation to take your tearful objections into consideration.

No, it's their job to interpret them with regards to the constitution, not define, and when found wanting to resolve said issue with the least impact possible on our freedoms.

 

[martybegan]

No, it's an argument regarding the fundamental right of a US Citizen to RKBA. It's about Gun Control types trying to hide unconstitutional controls behind the mantra of safety.

Your fundamental right to be armed is preserved.

No, it isn't. When It takes my 3-6 months and $500 just to keep a revolver in my apartment my right is infringed.

You still get the gun, dope.

I'm still being infringed.

No.
You're butthurt over the process.

I am angry because my RKBA is being infringed. The whole purpose of NYC's process isn't safety but to discourage people from applying by making it too expensive and too time consuming.

 

[bendog]

Actually we do, that's the whole part of being an active citizen in a constitutional republic.

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

No, a sheep who thinks we work for government instead of the other way around.

It's the job of SCOTUS to Define our laws according to the constitution. They have no obligation to take your tearful objections into consideration.

Besides, VA is not THAT blue a state. And not all people who vote dem want to be disarmed. Probably a lot of them just want to keep their healthcare and schools.

 

[bendog]

Your fundamental right to be armed is preserved.

No, it isn't. When It takes my 3-6 months and $500 just to keep a revolver in my apartment my right is infringed.

You still get the gun, dope.

I'm still being infringed.

No.
You're butthurt over the process.

I am angry because my RKBA is being infringed. The whole purpose of NYC's process isn't safety but to discourage people from applying by making it too expensive and too time consuming.

And that has absolutely nothing to do with Virginia or what Virginians want, but thanks for playing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

LOL... Ok.

Typical SJW sheep.

baaaaaa...

You mean a good citizen who recognizes and respects how our system of government works.

No, a sheep who thinks we work for government instead of the other way around.

It's the job of SCOTUS to Define our laws according to the constitution. They have no obligation to take your tearful objections into consideration.

No, it's their job to interpret them with regards to the constitution, not define, and when found wanting to resolve said issue with the least impact possible on our freedoms.

Define as in constitutionality. Laws aren't interpreted. The constitution is.

Stop crying.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

What does it matter if someone has one hand gun or 250? WTF is "sensible" about that, I really would like to know. Last I check we only have two hands.

 

[Jarlaxle]

It's the private sales with no documentation or checks that make guns available to criminals.

Which is exactly what they are fighting against

Restricting handgun sales to one a month will cut down on straw buyers selling to criminals
So will mandatory background checks on ALL sales

Liar.

So you're able to account for every private sale in the US?

ARe you on some sort of drugs?

Ate(sic) you unable or just unwilling to answer?

It's an asinine question.

Look, I understand: you want guns limited to the rich, the well-connected, police, and criminals.