Why would anyone object to Virginia’s new gun laws?

[Blues Man]

Infringement isn't banning.

Is this infringement or not? Would voting requiring a $50 fee and a wait period for checks be infringement?

No. It's regulation. You still have the gun.
Infringement in this context means denying the right as Scalia stated in Heller.

Voting requires no such regulation.

The second says nothing about firearms regulations only the regulation of the militia

***** to SCOTUS.

Try reading the Second and then tell me where it says arms are to be regulated.

And all I did was post a fact but I guess you see that as bitching

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Where in the second amendment does it say arms are to be regulated?

 

[Jitss617]

No. It's regulation. You still have the gun.
Infringement in this context means denying the right as Scalia stated in Heller.

Voting requires no such regulation.

The second says nothing about firearms regulations only the regulation of the militia

***** to SCOTUS.

Try reading the Second and then tell me where it says arms are to be regulated.

And all I did was post a fact but I guess you see that as bitching

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Where in the second amendment does it say arms are to be regulated?

It doesn’t and as soon as blacks want their rights back lol democrats have to respect it

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The right to bear arms is not absolute
It never has been

This is the commie statist's excuse and rationalization for shitting on rights.


My rights are only limited by the equal rights of others. These laws that you love so much and masturbate too are completely misguided and misdirected.

Shooting down this bullshit is worth killing and dying for. Mostly killing. Killing commies for mommy.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Try to read it in context.

 

[rightwinger]

The people of NYC have spoken
NY is safer for it

The people of Alabama want to ban abortion. Let them do it?

Rights do not rely on popular vote.

They can take it to the courts just like gun control advocates have

Virginia’s laws are constitutional

So was Plessey at one time.

NYC's law are obviously unconstitutional, but you ignore them because they show the true goal of gun grabbing sissies like you.

Good luck

Why don’t you work on repealing NYC gun laws

Get yourself a nice gun rally like they had today

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

 

[rightwinger]

The right to bear arms is not absolute
It never has been

This is the commie statist's excuse and rationalization for shitting on rights.


My rights are only limited by the equal rights of others. These laws that you love so much and masturbate too are completely misguided and misdirected.

Shooting down this bullshit is worth killing and dying for. Mostly killing. Killing commies for mommy.

.

Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the communist party?

Be honest comrade

 

[martybegan]

The people of Alabama want to ban abortion. Let them do it?

Rights do not rely on popular vote.

They can take it to the courts just like gun control advocates have

Virginia’s laws are constitutional

So was Plessey at one time.

NYC's law are obviously unconstitutional, but you ignore them because they show the true goal of gun grabbing sissies like you.

Good luck

Why don’t you work on repealing NYC gun laws

Get yourself a nice gun rally like they had today

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

They are working their way up to it. You keep arguing the how and not the why because you can't defend the why without looking like the gun grabbing zealot people on this board know you are.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

None of those laws infringe on that right in any way.

Yes, they do..

They don't.
None of them prevent you from purchasing any gun.

Actually they do prevent the purchase of certain kinds of guns

In VA?

Yup

VA Gov’s 'assault weapons' proposal would ban new AR-15s; force registration or surrender of all existing

Just not the three laws that just passed and we are discussing. No?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

It sure is.

We all vote to banish you.

.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Who's talking about NYC?

It's what gun control nuts want in the end, it's the endgame for all this incremental control.

Is what I stated infringement or not?

No. You still own the gun. No?

Infringement isn't banning.

Is this infringement or not? Would voting requiring a $50 fee and a wait period for checks be infringement?

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

The right to vote and the right to possess a firearm are both subject to limits and restrictions but not the same limits and restrictions.

For example, one must be a citizen to exercise his right to vote but non-citizens who are lawful permanent resident aliens are afforded the same Second Amendment rights as citizens.

No, it shows how hypocritical gun control SJW sit while peeing pansy types like you are.

No, it shows how hypocritical gun control SJW sit while peeing pansy types like you are.

It seems more like you are the "peeing pansy type" who cant get your hands on a gun quick enough to feel safe.

 

[Blues Man]

The people of Alabama want to ban abortion. Let them do it?

Rights do not rely on popular vote.

They can take it to the courts just like gun control advocates have

Virginia’s laws are constitutional

So was Plessey at one time.

NYC's law are obviously unconstitutional, but you ignore them because they show the true goal of gun grabbing sissies like you.

Good luck

Why don’t you work on repealing NYC gun laws

Get yourself a nice gun rally like they had today

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

One of the major tenets of the Constitution is that rights are not subject to mob rule.

 

[Blues Man]

Yes, they do..

They don't.
None of them prevent you from purchasing any gun.

Actually they do prevent the purchase of certain kinds of guns

In VA?

Yup

VA Gov’s 'assault weapons' proposal would ban new AR-15s; force registration or surrender of all existing

Just not the three laws that just passed and we are discussing. No?

Still part of the package of the gun laws

And where is it written in the OP the three and only three gun laws are being discussed?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No. It's regulation. You still have the gun.
Infringement in this context means denying the right as Scalia stated in Heller.

Voting requires no such regulation.

The second says nothing about firearms regulations only the regulation of the militia

***** to SCOTUS.

Try reading the Second and then tell me where it says arms are to be regulated.

And all I did was post a fact but I guess you see that as bitching

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Where in the second amendment does it say arms are to be regulated?

I've already referred you to the answer.

 

[Blues Man]

The second says nothing about firearms regulations only the regulation of the militia

***** to SCOTUS.

Try reading the Second and then tell me where it says arms are to be regulated.

And all I did was post a fact but I guess you see that as bitching

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Where in the second amendment does it say arms are to be regulated?

I've already referred you to the answer.

No you are dodging the question.

As usual

 

[Hutch Starskey]

They don't.
None of them prevent you from purchasing any gun.

Actually they do prevent the purchase of certain kinds of guns

In VA?

Yup

VA Gov’s 'assault weapons' proposal would ban new AR-15s; force registration or surrender of all existing

Just not the three laws that just passed and we are discussing. No?

Still part of the package of the gun laws

No. It was not.

 

[Blues Man]

Actually they do prevent the purchase of certain kinds of guns

In VA?

Yup

VA Gov’s 'assault weapons' proposal would ban new AR-15s; force registration or surrender of all existing

Just not the three laws that just passed and we are discussing. No?

Still part of the package of the gun laws

No. It was not.

So it's not a VA gun laws that is in the works?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

***** to SCOTUS.

Try reading the Second and then tell me where it says arms are to be regulated.

And all I did was post a fact but I guess you see that as bitching

Try reading Scalia's opinion on Heller. That is fact as well.

Where in the second amendment does it say arms are to be regulated?

I've already referred you to the answer.

No you are dodging the question.

As usual

I provided the best explanation of the second as it exists today under the law.

Read it or don't but reserve your bitching for those who make such rulings.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

In VA?

Yup

VA Gov’s 'assault weapons' proposal would ban new AR-15s; force registration or surrender of all existing

Just not the three laws that just passed and we are discussing. No?

Still part of the package of the gun laws

No. It was not.

So it's not a VA gun laws that is in the works?

The thread is anout the three that passed.

 

[martybegan]

It's what gun control nuts want in the end, it's the endgame for all this incremental control.

Is what I stated infringement or not?

No. You still own the gun. No?

Infringement isn't banning.

Is this infringement or not? Would voting requiring a $50 fee and a wait period for checks be infringement?

This fails as a false comparison fallacy.

The right to vote and the right to possess a firearm are both subject to limits and restrictions but not the same limits and restrictions.

For example, one must be a citizen to exercise his right to vote but non-citizens who are lawful permanent resident aliens are afforded the same Second Amendment rights as citizens.

No, it shows how hypocritical gun control SJW sit while peeing pansy types like you are.

No, it shows how hypocritical gun control SJW sit while peeing pansy types like you are.

It seems more like you are the "peeing pansy type" who cant get your hands on a gun quick enough to feel safe.

I actually don't own a gun, but I refuse to give up my right to own one, and not go through hoops to get it.

Just like I have never had to use my rights to a speedy trial, to a trial by jury of my peers, to be secure from unwarranted searches, or not be cruelly and/or unusually punished, but I refuse to give up those rights either.

 

[martybegan]

They can take it to the courts just like gun control advocates have

Virginia’s laws are constitutional

So was Plessey at one time.

NYC's law are obviously unconstitutional, but you ignore them because they show the true goal of gun grabbing sissies like you.

Good luck

Why don’t you work on repealing NYC gun laws

Get yourself a nice gun rally like they had today

NYC's electorate is too apathetic and too set in their ways. The SC has to weigh in on laws so restrictive that their only goal is to deny RKBA to law abiding citizens.

Then it looks like you lose
Democracy is a ***** sometimes

But you do have the NRA to fight for you. Why don’t they challenge NYC laws?

One of the major tenets of the Constitution is that rights are not subject to mob rule.

Unless the mob can get 2/3 of Congress or the States to propose an amendment doing just that, and then get 3/4 of the States to go along with it.