Why won’t Merrick Garland release the affidavit for the Mar A Lago invasion?

[Oldestyle]

They reclaimed boxes of classified government property.

How is that fucking it up?

They conducted a raid on the home of an ex President of the United States, Marener! All to get some boxes that have been sitting unopened in a storage room for two years. If that affidavit doesn't contain some SERIOUS evidence of criminal activity by Trump then they have well and truly FUBARED themselves!

 

[mudwhistle]

You can't produce charges. If they existed, you would have told us exactly what they were. You're a pathetic liar.

I could produce them in a micro-second.
Every one of the people mentioned could be arrested under RICO statutes for criminal conspiracy.
They could also be arrested for obstruction of justice, espionage, perjury, destruction of evidence......and fall under RICO for murder charges, threatening judges, threatening Supreme Court justices, criminal conspiracy to plant evidence......the list goes on.

 

[Oldestyle]

Your problem is that courts require actual evidence…not you wild conspiracy theories

You mean like the kind that was given to the FISA Court by the DOJ back then, Winger? Is that the kind of "actual evidence" you're referring to? LOL

 

[ColonelAngus]

This warrant is so corrupt.

Just ghastly.

Its full of Constitutional violations.

 

[occupied]

They've already fucked it up, Occupied. They can't prove a crime took place and they've made Trump into a martyr. As usual...whatever Biden and the left touch turns to shit and that includes trying to pull off a political hit job!

He got caught with stolen classified documents in a safe we have to assume only he had the combination to. That's about as red-handed as it gets.

 

[Oldestyle]

He got caught with stolen classified documents in a safe we have to assume only he had the combination to. That's about as red-handed as it gets.

Dude, the safe was empty! Duh?
See what happens when you "assume" things!

 

[MagicMike]

Ruh-roh..... they're not even leaking shit to the press now, which is all they're really good at anymore. Organizing fed-nappings and fake insurrections has been fucking disaster for them.....

The brownshirts threw some raw meat at their marxist fringefucks with the ransacking of Melania's boudoir, and now they want it to just go away. If they had even a SNIFF of anything it would have been leaked by now.

Get your votes in early. The fbi building will be turned into 1) A homeless dog shelter 2) A spook house for Halloween (kinda ironic) 3) Just level the mother fucker. Call your congress critter with your choice.

Someone is feeding you fake news dude.
Check out what the REAL reporting on this sounds like.

"From the moment Donald Trump announced the FBI had searched his Mar-a-Lago residence to the public release of the search warrant that unveiled the former president is under investigation for potential obstruction of justice and Espionage Act violations, Trump world has thrown out a series of shifting explanations. And they haven’t all stuck."

Trump world's shifting narrative on the Mar-a-Lago docs

As more information trickles out about the scope of the government’s investigation into the former president, here’s a timeline of team Trump’s shifting defense.

www.politico.com

 

[Oldestyle]

Someone is feeding you fake news dude.
Check out what the REAL reporting on this sounds like.

"From the moment Donald Trump announced the FBI had searched his Mar-a-Lago residence to the public release of the search warrant that unveiled the former president is under investigation for potential obstruction of justice and Espionage Act violations, Trump world has thrown out a series of shifting explanations. And they haven’t all stuck."

Trump world's shifting narrative on the Mar-a-Lago docs

As more information trickles out about the scope of the government’s investigation into the former president, here’s a timeline of team Trump’s shifting defense.

www.politico.com

Politico is REAL reporting? Aren't you cute! LOL

 

[Bob Blaylock]

He seems to be hiding something.

 

[Marener]

They conducted a raid on the home of an ex President of the United States, Marener! All to get some boxes that have been sitting unopened in a storage room for two years. If that affidavit doesn't contain some SERIOUS evidence of criminal activity by Trump then they have well and truly FUBARED themselves!

Those boxes were highly classified government property that Trump took and wouldn’t give back.

Regardless of criminality, the government needed to take their property back for national security.

There’s no way to look at this honestly and think that it wasn’t justified.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Thewarrant called for seizure of ANY government document created between Jan 21st 2017 and Jan 21st 2021.


TALK ABOUT A FISHING EXPEDITION. CORRUPT AS FUCK!

 

[ColonelAngus]

Odd the corrupt DOJ did not specify classified docs in the warrant.

 

[occupied]

Dude, the safe was empty! Duh?
See what happens when you "assume" things!

Trump world said the safe was empty but then they say a lot of things.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

He seems to be hiding something. Why all the secrecy on what they told the judge to get the search warrant?

Given the track record of the FBI lying to courts one would think he would be more transparent

FBI Lawyer Criminally Charged For Lying To The FISA Court

Clinesmith (PDF) Clinesmith (Text)

www.techdirt.com

Here is the DOJ's motion which opposes the release....

https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/DOJ-Response-Unseal-Warrant-08332.pdf

It states in part:

There remain compelling reasons, including to protect the integrity of an ongoing law enforcement investigation that implicates national security, that support keeping the affidavit sealed.1
1 The government has carefully considered whether the affidavit can be released subject to redactions. For the reasons discussed below, the redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest. Nevertheless, should the Court order partial unsealing of the affidavit, the government respectfully requests an opportunity to provide the Court with proposed redactions.

...Disclosure at this juncture of the affidavit supporting probable cause would, by contrast, cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation...

...If disclosed, the affidavit would serve as a roadmap to the government’s ongoing investigation, providing specific details about its direction and likely course, in a manner that is highly likely to compromise future investigative steps. In addition, information about witnesses is particularly sensitive given the high-profile nature of this matter and the risk that the revelation of witness identities would impact their willingness to cooperate with the investigation....

...the affidavit cannot responsibly be unsealed in a redacted form absent redactions that would be so extensive as to render the document devoid of content that would meaningfully enhance the public’s understanding of these events beyond the information already now in the public record...

[They also argue more than once that they already released the warrant and seized items list, as if that has some major relevance.

They also claim that if they released the warrant, it would have a silencing effect on future witnesses who expect to remain anonymous. This is complete BS, as any witnesses or identifying testimony would be redacted.

They also claim that anyone else about to be indicted might flee.

They also claim that “line-by-line redaction is not practical,” which is BS.]

The DOJ's arguments are without merit. They already seized what they wanted to. They have the opportunity to help redact the affidavit if released.

The real reason they don't want it released, is as we all know.... It will be picked to shreds and we will all claim BS, because it will be so obviously flawed.

 

[otto105]

Why didn't they use a Federal Judge, Otto?

They did.

 

[otto105]

We already acknowledge that democrats are not subject to the law. Which is why Obama wasn't impeached and Holder wasn't jailed for Fast & Furious. Why Lois Lerner wasn't prosecuted as Obama weaponized the IRS against America, Why Hillary paid no price for what she did in Benghazi as Obama lied to the nation. Why Holder and his thugs didn't serve time for illegal wire tapping the Associated Press. Why the Obama NSA had no prosecutions for PRISM and illegally spying on tens of millions of Americans.

Had ANY Republican done any of these, they would got to prison for life. BUT simply state, democrats are not subject to ANY law. The Reich is above the law,

Yeah, whataboutism!!!

 

[two_iron]

Someone is feeding you fake news dude.
Check out what the REAL reporting on this sounds like.

"From the moment Donald Trump announced the FBI had searched his Mar-a-Lago residence to the public release of the search warrant that unveiled the former president is under investigation for potential obstruction of justice and Espionage Act violations, Trump world has thrown out a series of shifting explanations. And they haven’t all stuck."

Trump world's shifting narrative on the Mar-a-Lago docs

As more information trickles out about the scope of the government’s investigation into the former president, here’s a timeline of team Trump’s shifting defense.

www.politico.com

Not trying to be mean, but when a marxist cocksucker like you gets on here and begs, it's a sign the productive half of the country is over the target.

Your masters have less than nothing. Per Rasmussen, the majority of America agrees that ransacking the former POTUS' home is "something that happens in a banana republic" to quote the question....

Keep eating the corn out of their shit.... it must be tasty.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yeah, whataboutism!!!

Wow, you should learn what the terms on your hate sites mean before vomiting them out.

 

[Clipper]

Anything on topic?

That is on topic, CLOWN.

 

[Marener]

They also claim that if they released the warrant, it would have a silencing effect on future witnesses who expect to remain anonymous. This is complete BS, as any witnesses or identifying testimony would be redacted.

We aren’t talking about a large pool of people. Someone familiar with the individuals would be able to figure out who is providing information based on the characteristics of what they are able to tell the FBI.

Even without release of the affidavit, which would be extremely unusual in an ongoing investigation, we know the FBI found what they thought they’d find.