Why won’t Merrick Garland release the affidavit for the Mar A Lago invasion?

[Uncensored2008]

Can you tell me about the contacts described or are you clueless again?

There were no contacts.

Again, your own witch hunt and attempted coup refutes you.

How sad is that?

 

[Marener]

Right, you're a fucking liar - got it.

The Trump Tower meeting set up by Glenn Simpson who was working for the Clinton campaign - where Clinton insider and Russian agent Natalia Veselnitskaya, being run by Bruce Ohr, part of the Obama cadre.

Simpson lied to the Trump campaign that they had evidence of Clinton making illegal deals with the Kremlin. (Not a lie that Clinton was dealing with the Kremlin, only that they would provide evidence) Of course when the campaign met Natalia Veselnitskaya she did as directed by Ohr and tried to turn the discussion to the Magnitsky Act, so the Trump team walked out of the meeting.

You know all of this came out in the AG report, and is the reason that Durham is pursuing criminal charges against you traitors, right?

Hahahahaha!

There was no AG report. There was an IG report which says nothing like what you’re talking about.

Durham has listed two charges, totally unreleased to the Trump Tower meeting. The first prosecution blew up in his face. The second prosecution is still pending and has nothing to do with the Trump Tower meeting.

But they still met with Russians even though you and Trump tried to deny it. Fucking liars.

Durham is as big of a loser as you are.

 

[Marener]

There were no contacts.

Again, your own witch hunt and attempted coup refutes you.

How sad is that?

Then what was your expert referencing in Vol I, Section IV?

Why, it was an extensive documentation of the many contacts.

 

[Faun]

Was there an affidavit? They are writing it right now.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Is this an admission that they are tailoring the affidavit to conform with what they found?

I agree.

 

[Faun]

Is this an admission that they are tailoring the affidavit to conform with what they found?

I agree.

LOL

No, it's me pointing out you're crazy for questioning the existence of the affidavit, since it's a constitutionally required component of a search warrant.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

LOL

No, it's me pointing out you're crazy for questioning the existence of the affidavit, since it's a constitutionally required component of a search warrant.

Of course it is. But, this is a Democrat operation and they are not known for behaving constitutionally. It is wise to doubt everything.

 

[Faun]

Of course it is. But, this is a Democrat operation and they are not known for behaving constitutionally. It is wise to doubt everything.

LOL

Slobbers a member of the herd promoting the unconstitutional method of selecting the U.S. president by having the vice president being the sole voter to pick the president and vice president.

 

[WEATHER53]

Once again...why didn't Garland go to court to demand that the subpoena be obeyed? That's the normal next step. Why was it skipped? Why was a raid deemed neccessary?

More dramatic and feeling is it makesTrump look worse for the democrat children

 

[EvilCat Breath]

LOL

Slobbers a member of the herd promoting the unconstitutional method of selecting the U.S. president by having the vice president being the sole voter to pick the president and vice president.

Okay you stopped making sense.

 

[toobfreak]

Why won’t Merrick Garland release the affidavit for the Mar A Lago invasion?​

Well obviously Nos, he won't release it because showing it would weaken his case and force him to answer questions he has no good answer for!

 

[WEATHER53]

Well obviously Nos, he won't release it because showing it would weaken his case and force him to answer questions he has no good answer for!

What is he hiding?
Proof must be provided he’s not hiding.

 

[Marener]

What is he hiding?
Proof must be provided he’s not hiding.

He’s hiding witnesses from Trump’s violent terrorists.

 

[toobfreak]

He’s hiding witnesses from Trump’s violent terrorists.

Really? Is that the story you really want to stick with?

 

[Marener]

Really? Is that the story you really want to stick with?

Of course it is. It’s the same story for any other prosecution as well.

We protect witnesses from intimidation.

 

[WEATHER53]

Liberals have really latched on to controlling “safety for your own good”
How about we let accomplished adults decide what works for them.

 

[WEATHER53]

Of course it is. It’s the same story for any other prosecution as well.

We protect witnesses from intimidation.

But not SC justices where laws are Already on the books

 

[Marener]

But not SC justices where laws are Already on the books

We already know the names of SC justices, don’t we?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hahahahaha!

There was no AG report. There was an IG report which says nothing like what you’re talking about.

Durham has listed two charges, totally unreleased to the Trump Tower meeting. The first prosecution blew up in his face. The second prosecution is still pending and has nothing to do with the Trump Tower meeting.

But they still met with Russians even though you and Trump tried to deny it. Fucking liars.

Durham is as big of a loser as you are.

Learn to read.

I said the irregularities in the Trump tower attempted entrapment were part of the catalyst for the Durham investigation, not the subject. As for the Horowitz report, you're correct he is the Inspector General, not Oberfuhrer, which is that scumbag Garland.

Would you agree that what Simpson and Clinton with the help of Bruce Ohr did at Trump tower was espionage and skirted treason?

 

[Uncensored2008]

We already know the names of SC justices, don’t we?

Is that a threat?