Why won’t Merrick Garland release the affidavit for the Mar A Lago invasion?

Try listening to law experts. Believing in conspiracies is not good for anyone's health
Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.
What evidence did they have about something unlawful being there is in the affidavit. Hiding behind “security” is not a lawful response
 

Goof Lord…you really jerked it to Mueller for a long time.

It made Trumptards spasm. That made me laugh. A lot.
 
Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.
What evidence did they have about something unlawful being there is in the affidavit. Hiding behind “security” is not a lawful response
They did not "break" into a home.

First one needs to have information that there is something still at Mar O Lago. Then one writes an affidavit detailing what is going to need a search warrant for.

The FBI did inform the Secret service before they arrived at Mar O Lago, they were let in to do their job.

Apparently someone at Mar O Lago may have seen that those classified and Top Secret documents had not been returned in January and let the proper authorities know about it.

Trump's lawyer signed an affidavit saying that there were no more documents there, in June. Apparently he may have lied in the Affidavit .
 
That quote has nothing to do with affairs of government.

Can you disprove any of the other 30,000? What are they about, do you even care to read about them?
It was on their list, so I proved they are full of shit.
 
LOL

Lie...

Melania Trump leaves the White House with the worst popularity rating for any first lady at the end of her term in polling history.

:itsok:
Did he say anything about polls, Simp?

Your source is shit.
 
They did not "break" into a home.

First one needs to have information that there is something still at Mar O Lago. Then one writes an affidavit detailing what is going to need a search warrant for.

The FBI did inform the Secret service before they arrived at Mar O Lago, they were let in to do their job.

Apparently someone at Mar O Lago may have seen that those classified and Top Secret documents had not been returned in January and let the proper authorities know about it.

Trump's lawyer signed an affidavit saying that there were no more documents there, in June. Apparently he may have lied in the Affidavit .
They were on a non specific fishing trip and after they broke it they found something they feel is useful. It’s all very blurred and would be clarified by the affidavits which they don’t want to provide because they know its way too unspecific.
Like you liberals LOVE to demand-prove yourself innocent .
 
Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.
What evidence did they have about something unlawful being there is in the affidavit. Hiding behind “security” is not a lawful response
Who was claiming victory?

The investigation is ongoing as to how the documents ended at Mar O Lago and whether Trump had actually declassified them and how.

There is an agency and process for declassifying documents and the agency was not aware of them being declassified.
 
That’s a great example of irony.
Are you saying that Democrats have been harassing, threatening, and even attacking Poll workers, congresspeople, FBI, etc and their families the way some Republican voters have been doing since 2020?
 
Are you saying that Democrats have been harassing, threatening, and even attacking Poll workers, congresspeople, FBI, etc and their families the way some Republican voters have been doing since 2020?
Who illegally protested in front of SC judges homes?
 
They were on a non specific fishing trip and after they broke it they found something they feel is useful. It’s all very blurred and would be clarified by the affidavits which they don’t want to provide because they know its way too unspecific.
Like you liberals LOVE to demand-prove yourself innocent .
It was very specific, as per the affidavit and the warrant.
No Federal Judge will grant a search warrant unless it has merit.

No Affidavit can be shown, NONE, before all of the investigation is over.

Not BEFORE it is over.

It requires patience from every curious person, and we al are, as to what the affidavit and the investigation will show.
 
The Law says that there is a need for an affidavit. There has always been one for a search warrant.

Why was there a search warrant when the President had already made everything available to the Gestapo and offered to let them take the documents?

Is that that why Oberfuhrer Garland judge shopped down to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer? To avoid scrutiny from federal judges?
 
He spoke of her popularity with the people. That's measured by polls.
Where did he say she was popular with the majority of the people, Simp?

See, that's how your shit source operates. They have to twist his comments to try to make them into lies.
 
Why was there a search warrant when the President had already made everything available to the Gestapo and offered to let them take the documents?

Is that that why Oberfuhrer Garland judge shopped down to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer? To avoid scrutiny from federal judges?
You wish to twist it all into a pretzel, be your guest.
It has all been explained in the previous posts and pages
 
Where did he say she was popular with the majority of the people, Simp?

See, that's how your shit source operates. They have to twist his comments to try to make them into lies.

Then she wasn't so popular.
 

Forum List

Back
Top