Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 53,502
- 10,368
- 2,140
Changing the subject. Why?Why do you support illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Changing the subject. Why?Why do you support illegal immigrants and sanctuary cities?
Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.Try listening to law experts. Believing in conspiracies is not good for anyone's health
It's Mueller Time!
He could recommend it. He completely retracted what he said to Lieu about obstruction and the report always stated there was no conspiracy. These are facts. Pussies like you don’t have the mental capacity to understand basic English. He could have but he said he chose not to because a sitting...www.usmessageboard.com
Goof Lord…you really jerked it to Mueller for a long time.
They did not "break" into a home.Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.
What evidence did they have about something unlawful being there is in the affidavit. Hiding behind “security” is not a lawful response
That’s a great example of irony.Just admit it. You want the names of everyone involved right now, so your can harrass them and their families.
Especially their families.
They were on a non specific fishing trip and after they broke it they found something they feel is useful. It’s all very blurred and would be clarified by the affidavits which they don’t want to provide because they know its way too unspecific.They did not "break" into a home.
First one needs to have information that there is something still at Mar O Lago. Then one writes an affidavit detailing what is going to need a search warrant for.
The FBI did inform the Secret service before they arrived at Mar O Lago, they were let in to do their job.
Apparently someone at Mar O Lago may have seen that those classified and Top Secret documents had not been returned in January and let the proper authorities know about it.
Trump's lawyer signed an affidavit saying that there were no more documents there, in June. Apparently he may have lied in the Affidavit .
Who was claiming victory?Those references are liberal cart before horse once again. Stating that you can break into a home searching for random, unidentified “evidence” and then claiming victory when you stumble upon it is commie crap.
What evidence did they have about something unlawful being there is in the affidavit. Hiding behind “security” is not a lawful response
Yeah, triggered Trumptards.
Are you saying that Democrats have been harassing, threatening, and even attacking Poll workers, congresspeople, FBI, etc and their families the way some Republican voters have been doing since 2020?That’s a great example of irony.
Who illegally protested in front of SC judges homes?Are you saying that Democrats have been harassing, threatening, and even attacking Poll workers, congresspeople, FBI, etc and their families the way some Republican voters have been doing since 2020?
Did he say anything about polls, Simp?
Your source is shit.
It was very specific, as per the affidavit and the warrant.They were on a non specific fishing trip and after they broke it they found something they feel is useful. It’s all very blurred and would be clarified by the affidavits which they don’t want to provide because they know its way too unspecific.
Like you liberals LOVE to demand-prove yourself innocent .
The Law says that there is a need for an affidavit. There has always been one for a search warrant.
Peaceful protests are lawful under US lawsWho illegally protested in front of SC judges homes?
You Nazi fucks are all alike.
Where did he say she was popular with the majority of the people, Simp?He spoke of her popularity with the people. That's measured by polls.
You wish to twist it all into a pretzel, be your guest.Why was there a search warrant when the President had already made everything available to the Gestapo and offered to let them take the documents?
Is that that why Oberfuhrer Garland judge shopped down to Jeffery Epstein's lawyer? To avoid scrutiny from federal judges?
Where did he say she was popular with the majority of the people, Simp?
See, that's how your shit source operates. They have to twist his comments to try to make them into lies.