Why were Weisselberg and Pecker given immunity?

[nat4900]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

 

[Papageorgio]

Getting closer to Pence.

 

[JGalt]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

 

[S.J.]

Mueller would have given Charles Manson immunity if he would agree to say Trump did something impeachable.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They were given immunity because Mueller threatened phony charges.

 

[S.J.]

Mueller's strategy is to investigate anyone and everyone who has ever had anything to do with Trump, find something on them, then offer immunity if they'll implement the President in some kind of illegal activity to make us all think he should be run out of office. And if they don't, they'll end up like Manafort, spending 23 hours a day in solitary confinement.

 

[nat4900]

Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime,

Oh, gee.......and even his attorneys AND the judge forgot to tell Cohen that he was pleading guilty to something that wasn't a crime???......
You're more of a moron than usual, Mr. Rand......lol

 

[nat4900]

they'll end up like Manafort, spending 23 hours a day in solitary confinement.[/QUOTE]


You must be a big fan of Tax Cheats.....and Bank Defrauders.....

Gio visit manafort in prison and lend your support for him.

 

[S.J.]

they'll end up like Manafort, spending 23 hours a day in solitary confinement.[/QUOTE]


You must be a big fan of Tax Cheats.....and Bank Defrauders.....

Gio visit manafort in prison and lend your support for him.

Tax cheats, you mean like Charlie Rangel, Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle?

 

[nat4900]

Tax cheats, you mean like Charlie Rangel, Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle?

manafort was found GUILTY by a jury of his peers......Shove that up your sorry ass and stop defending scum....including defending the scumbag in chief.

This thread is about explaining what immunity implies....go bitch about your world falling apart on your own thread.

 

[S.J.]

Tax cheats, you mean like Charlie Rangel, Tim Geithner, Tom Daschle?

manafort was found GUILTY by a jury of his peers......Shove that up your sorry ass and stop defending scum....including defending the scumbag in chief.

This thread is about explaining what immunity implies....go bitch about your world falling apart on your own thread.

The only world that's gonna fall apart is yours, when Mueller's extortion scheme fails. Everyone knows if you threaten somebody with 10 years in prison you can get them to say anything you want, and the American people know it too. Shove THAT up your ass.

 

[Crepitus]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

 

[caddo kid]

Weisselberg goes back decades within the Trump organization, all the way to the time of Fred Trump.
Weisselberg knows EVERYTHING there is to know about the Trump's business & criminal activities going back for decades.
Weisselberg is old, nearing the 'end' & he wants to clear his soul before the inevitable.
The writing is on the wall for Trump & his crime family.
Good times are coming.

 

[S.J.]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

Sorry, but real people who know the law say you're wrong.

 

[JGalt]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

And the big deal is? Hell, the Federal Election Commission only levied a $370,000 fine against Obama's 2008 presidential campaign over a shitload of campaign finance violations, including missing filing deadlines for disclosing large donations during the final weeks of the campaign, reporting the wrong dates on certain contributions, and not returning donations that exceeded the campaign contribution maximum quickly enough.

But it's Trump, right? Oh, I forgot. We live under two different sets of laws in this country: One set for the leftist political elite, and one set for the rest of us.

 

[JGalt]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

Sorry, but real people who know the law say you're wrong.

Even if they could prove that Trump was somehow guilty of a federal campaign fund violation, the penalty is nothing more than a fine.

Hell, John Edwards was investigated for allegedly using more than $1 million in political donations to cover up an affair, but wasn't convicted of it. He was indicted on six felony charges, including four counts of collecting illegal campaign contributions, one count of conspiracy, and one count of making false statements.

The only thing Mueller could possibly get on Trump is the latter (making a false statement), and that would only happen if Trump falls for the perjury trap that Mueller is setting up for him.

 

[Dragonlady]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

If it wasn’t a crime, the judge would not have accepted the plea.

But keep drinking that Trump Kool-Aid idiot.

 

[Crepitus]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

Sorry, but real people who know the law say you're wrong.

Right, real people like faux news commentators? They know more than the Judges and prosecutors and defense attorneys who signed off on the plea agreement?


For Christ's sake would you think about what you're saying?
You kids have got to stop with this fake news crap. It's rotted ng your brains.

 

[Crepitus]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

And the big deal is? Hell, the Federal Election Commission only levied a $370,000 fine against Obama's 2008 presidential campaign over a shitload of campaign finance violations, including missing filing deadlines for disclosing large donations during the final weeks of the campaign, reporting the wrong dates on certain contributions, and not returning donations that exceeded the campaign contribution maximum quickly enough.

But it's Trump, right? Oh, I forgot. We live under two different sets of laws in this country: One set for the leftist political elite, and one set for the rest of us.

There is no equivalency between the cases.

 

[S.J.]

The simple answer to the question posed in the thread's title is that "immunity" allows a witness to testify (in some cases waving one's 5th amendment rights) without fear of inculpating oneself....

Prior to such immunity being given, a witness meets with prosecutors in what lawyers call a "proffer session" where the information is gauged for both relevancy and accuracy.

The two guys mentioned in the thread's title have much to offer prosecutors regarding Cohen AND Trump. Sleepless nights for Cohen...for sure.....but even more nightmares for Trump AND his family.

Because like Cohen, they were offered lesser charges because Mueller thinks he has something incriminating against Trump. Cohen actually pleaded guilty to something that even isn't a crime, in order to get the more serious charges dropped.

Sorry kid, but it is a crime.

Sorry, but real people who know the law say you're wrong.

Right, real people like faux news commentators? They know more than the Judges and prosecutors and defense attorneys who signed off on the plea agreement?


For Christ's sake would you think about what you're saying?
You kids have got to stop with this fake news crap. It's rotted ng your brains.

Maybe you should do a little research before shooting your mouth off, idiot.
Donald Trump and hush money: On par with jaywalking?