Why we have gun crime...7 time felon with 4th gun case freed on ankle monitor tries to shoot and kill his girlfriend. Thanks democrats.

[Bell Huey]

Well organized
No WELL ORGANIZED militia, no right.

Well, have fun with that.

 

[2aguy]

No, miller found that the militia portion of the second allowed government to regulate weapons of war, such as Tommy Guns, which were the favorite of gangsters at the time.
As a result of tighter gun laws, the murder rate was cut in half by 1940.

No......it didn't say that...it said a sawed off shotgun was not a weapon used by the military and so it could be banned......meaning military weapons for civilians could not be banned because of the 2nd Amendment.

 

[2aguy]

No, you are like assholes.
Putting out nothing but crap.
The proof?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Right there in the words if you choose to read them

That is the Dependent Clause.....it has no meaning without the Independent clause..

You moron......

A dependent clause is a clause that cannot stand alone as a complete sentence because it does not express a complete thought.
-------
A dependent clause supports the main clause of a sentence by adding to its meaning.

Dependent Clause: Explanation and Examples

A dependent clause is one that cannot stand alone as a sentence. A dependent clause will function as an adjective, and adverb, or a noun. A dependent clause includes a subject and a verb in the clause.

www.grammar-monster.com

 

[Dadoalex]

Well, have fun with that.

Tick-Tock

 

[Dadoalex]

That is the Dependent Clause.....it has no meaning without the Independent clause..

You moron......

A dependent clause is a clause that cannot stand alone as a complete sentence because it does not express a complete thought.
-------
A dependent clause supports the main clause of a sentence by adding to its meaning.

Dependent Clause: Explanation and Examples

A dependent clause is one that cannot stand alone as a sentence. A dependent clause will function as an adjective, and adverb, or a noun. A dependent clause includes a subject and a verb in the clause.

www.grammar-monster.com

So the founders are morons?

Why include the clause if it has no meaning?

Your opinion of the founders is pretty low.

 

[AZrailwhale]

No, you are like assholes.
Putting out nothing but crap.
The proof?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Right there in the words if you choose to read them

If the founders had meant the militia, that line would read "the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". They clearly meant the PEOPLE because in all cases, the various militias were formed from the average citizens of an area. The government already had the right to stockpile weapons for military use and had been doing so from the beginning of the Revolutionary War. The French were selling and giving muskets and cannon to the government for the Continental Army. The members of the militias were required to furnish their own weapons since they were NOT part of the government forces. Militia units and members could come and go at their own pleasure, they weren't signed to term contracts like the members of the Continental Army were.

 

[Bell Huey]

Tick-Tock

Tick Tock what? I am waiting for your grand ideas.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Don't need many. Just one in charge of updating records is enough to create multiple mass shootings in Texas.

How about showing us some proof that that has happened.

 

[AZrailwhale]

So the founders are morons?

Why include the clause if it has no meaning?

Your opinion of the founders is pretty low.

The founders weren't morons, they just never considered that morons like you would try to parse their statements to change the meanings.

 

[Blues Man]

No, you are like assholes.
Putting out nothing but crap.
The proof?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Right there in the words if you choose to read them

And I have provided you with analysis of that usage at the time and a conclusion by others that the Second Amendment protects the individual ownership of firearms regardless of service in a militia.

You have provided nothing but you own worthless opinion.

And the operant clause of the 2ns is

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

 

[Dadoalex]

If the founders had meant the militia, that line would read "the right of the MILITIA to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". They clearly meant the PEOPLE because in all cases, the various militias were formed from the average citizens of an area. The government already had the right to stockpile weapons for military use and had been doing so from the beginning of the Revolutionary War. The French were selling and giving muskets and cannon to the government for the Continental Army. The members of the militias were required to furnish their own weapons since they were NOT part of the government forces. Militia units and members could come and go at their own pleasure, they weren't signed to term contracts like the members of the Continental Army were.

And "The people" is clearly not an individual right.

Sorry, you can't separate the coffee from the cream.

 

[Dadoalex]

Tick Tock what? I am waiting for your grand ideas.

 

[Dadoalex]

How about showing us some proof that that has happened.

How about reading the daily news.

GEEZ, educate yourself spunky.

 

[Dadoalex]

The founders weren't morons, they just never considered that morons like you would try to parse their statements to change the meanings.

Then the militia part has mean as does "the people" part. You're just too brainwashed to see the truth.

 

[Dadoalex]

And I have provided you with analysis of that usage at the time and a conclusion by others that the Second Amendment protects the individual ownership of firearms regardless of service in a militia.

You have provided nothing but you own worthless opinion.

And the operant clause of the 2ns is

THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

{{meta.fullTitle}}

www.oyez.org

 

[JoeB131]

The Heller decision

Nobody cares, Chat Bot... I wouldn't have taken 210 years and fanatics to find that if it was evident.

 

[JoeB131]

No......it didn't say that...it said a sawed off shotgun was not a weapon used by the military and so it could be banned......meaning military weapons for civilians could not be banned because of the 2nd Amendment.

It was far more reaching than that, as it allowed the government to regulate firearms in general and upheld the constitutionality of the Firearms Act of 1934 which was passed because gangsters were gunning down people with Tommy guns. Today, the image of pinstriped gangster with a Tommy Gun seems a bit quaint compared to what goes on today.

 

[Hollie]

Nobody cares, Chat Bot... I wouldn't have taken 210 years and fanatics to find that if it was evident.

Don’t go away angry, self-hating leftist. Before you rattle on, making a fool of yourself by not understanding what you comment on, do your homework.

 

[JoeB131]

Don’t go away angry, self-hating leftist.

Oh, Chatty, you add nothing to a conversation...

 

[Hollie]

Oh, Chatty, you add nothing to a conversation...

You’re having a difficult time dealing with your complete lack of understanding with regard to the Heller decision you misrepresented and then tried to sidestep away from.

It was a total disaster for you.