Why wasnt Obama impeached for starting 5 wars?

No no, daddy was a grease spot before Jr. decide to hang out with Al Qaeda. What kind of family lets a 16 year old hang out with terrorist?

You mean after you join or start hanging out at some terrorist organization and use your knowledge of America to help the terrorist attack and kill American women and children? Probably so.
Do you have any evidence to support the 16 year old was a terrorist? No? You can make all the excuses you want but he was denied due process and executed by Obama and you are ok with that
 
Man, you are all screwed up. Al Qaeda was supported and encouraged by the CIA.
Nope, the Taliban.

I think yoh are referring to the freedom fighters many of which joined AQ, that fought th Russians
You are wrong because you are having difficulties following the time line and because you are blind-sighted by CIA propaganda. The US created, supported, and funding the whole lot. Everything considered, the Taliban are the good guys.
 
It seems there was not concern about Obama starting 5 wars.


Libya, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia

He should have been impeached if you use the same criteria that those who are calling for Trump’s impeachment are using.

This is nothing but politics and it is counterproductive and even damaging to the country.

Can someone explain how Obama’s attacks were worthy of not having Congressional approval? Why no impeachment?



Look who was backing Barry Soetoro...

Brennan, who served with homO's uber treasonous mommy in Pakistan CIA office, stole homO's passport to prevent us from seeing she wasn't born in America, then went from W's CIA Waterboarding Director to homO's CIA Chief
Zbigniew, in the photos with Col Tim Osman


who is on this team?


Here's What Michelle Obama Really Thinks About George W. Bush



Chris Wray
Bolton
Cheney
Paul Ryan
Murdoch


the whole military industrial complex....
 
They shouldn't be hosting terrorist organization like Al Qaeda and others who want to kill Americans.

The action Obama took were mostly under the 2001 AUMF against international terrorists like those who blind sided us on 9-11. You don't like what Obama did to those terrorist. Do you have some kind of sympathy for those terrorist who want to kill Americans? I mean GWB made it clear after 9-11 that if those governments where these terrorist operate from can't control them, we will! So **** um.
And so when Republicans were crying about Obama's illegal wars, they were being hypocrites and playing politics. Pretty dangerous of Republicans to do this. Now the president won't go blow up terrorists because they don't want Republicans accusing them of war crimes. Crimes like blowing up boats they say are carrying drugs. Why not send in the coast guard? Trump says their boats aren't fast enough so they have to blow those boats up. I bet one of those bombs cost as much as a fast boat costs. So buy faster boats Trump?

The truth seems more like Trump IS trying to help Regime change in Venesuela. Reminds me of Bush in Iraq. I thought Republicans were done meddling in other countries affairs. I guess that was a lie too. They just said that when a Democrat was President.

The truth is Trump could very easily lie us into another war. Half this country will swallow whatever he claims hook, line and sinker.
 



amazing how all of the worst 911 warmongering traitors like W's CIA Waterboarding Chief John Brennan


BENT OVER BACKWARDS AND FORWARDS for homO



Chris Wray
Cheney
Victoria Nuland worked for Cheney, did the Ukraine coup as a big under homO
Kim Cheatle worked for Cheney
Jeff Sessions
 
Do you have any evidence to support the 16 year old was a terrorist? No? You can make all the excuses you want but he was denied due process and executed by Obama and you are ok with that
I never said there is any evidence that the 16 year had old joined Al Qaeda. He just happened to be hanging out where all the Al Qaeda terrorists who were plotting to kill Americans were hanging out. So he got the prize for that. Why do you sympathize with the terrorists who want to kill Americans. Why do you hate America and Americans that much?
 
I never said there is any evidence that the 16 year had old joined Al Qaeda. He just happened to be hanging out where all the Al Qaeda terrorists who were plotting to kill Americans were hanging out. So he got the prize for that. Why do you sympathize with the terrorists who want to kill Americans. Why do you hate America and Americans that much?
I sympathize with any American that was denied due process and victim of extrajudicial executions
 
I sympathize with any American that was denied due process and victim of extrajudicial executions
Like a wannabe terrorists who's hanging around in the lawless area of Yemen and hanging around with people who target and kill American women and children.
 
Like a wannabe terrorists who's hanging around in the lawless area of Yemen and hanging around with people who target and kill American women and children.
who did this 16 year old kill?
 
who did this 16 year old kill?
Collateral damage refers to unintended harm to non-combatants, animals, or property during a military operation or any other activity
 
Collateral damage refers to unintended harm to non-combatants, animals, or property during a military operation or any other activity

Extrajudical killings aren't collaterla damage.
 
Dropping bombs on Al Qaeda in Yemen was never extrajudicial.
Killing Americans was

Obama and the demafasict literally developed a white paper claiming that killing Americans without judicial review was ok so long as a high official on the Obama admin approved
 
You mean like taking aim and shooting your adversary's wife or invading Irak and Serbia?
No, not sure what you are talking about and how that’s an extrajudicial killing…do tell
 
Extrajudical killings aren't collaterla damage.
You mean like taking aim and shooting your adversary's wife or invading Irak and Serbia?

No, not sure what you are talking about and how that’s an extrajudicial killing…do tell
None of the examples I presented were/are legal. Neither was assassinating Osama bin Laden. In other words, none of them can be classified as 'collateral damage'. They are [without doubt] Extrajudical killings - UNLAWFUL.
 
15th post
None of the examples I presented were/are legal. Neither was assassinating Osama bin Laden. In other words, none of them can be classified as 'collateral damage'. They are [without doubt] Extrajudical killings - UNLAWFUL.
How were they unlawful?

Not every punishment or killing needs judicial review.

But Americans are all protected by the constitution, no matter where they are. And many aliens are, if they are within its jurisdiction

Not sure how bin Laden was ever in the jurisdiction of the constitution
 
Killing Americans was

Obama and the demafasict literally developed a white paper claiming that killing Americans without judicial review was ok so long as a high official on the Obama admin approved
"The administration argued that it had the authority to use lethal force against a U.S. citizen who was a senior operational leader of al-Qaeda or an associated force and posed an "imminent threat of violent attack" to the U.S.. It reasoned that the due process clause of the Constitution does not require a judicial process in the context of an armed conflict."

Lawsuits filed by al-Awlaki's father challenging the killings were dismissed by federal courts.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
"The administration argued that it had the authority to use lethal force against a U.S. citizen who was a senior operational leader of al-Qaeda or an associated force and posed an "imminent threat of violent attack" to the U.S.. It reasoned that the due process clause of the Constitution does not require a judicial process in the context of an armed conflict."

Lawsuits filed by al-Awlaki's father challenging the killings were dismissed by federal courts.
So due process doesn’t exist for Americans when the president decides someone is a imminent threat

That’s the Obama doctrine

Well thankfully Trump hasn’t adopted that fascist mindset

But I guess he could one day

I find the courts dismissal of the law suit even more interesting…saying it was a political question and the court can’t interfere in the presidents executive authority there
 
So due process doesn’t exist for Americans when the president decides someone is a imminent threat
al-Awlaki still had the right to due process in America. He just had to come home and take his chances in court, face a jury of other citizens, like every other citizen. He chose to stay and materially support and participate with the group of terrorists in their quest to kill many more Americans. You remember al Qaeda don't you? The ***** who killed nearly 3 thousand people in America on 9-11.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Back
Top Bottom