Why was Charlie Kirk killed.

.

The left cult are children that were never trained to accept that some people are going to disagree with them, and that those people have the right to do so. Their parents never told them no, and so no one else has that right.

Look at the responses they display to being cancelled for their vicious speech towards Charlie Kirk and his death. They truly believed that they have the right to say anything they want to say and no one has the right to make them pay the consequences for anything they say or do.

We desperately need institutions in which they can be committed for the safety of everyone else, and Charlie's assassination is the best advertising I've seen for this.

REST IN FREEDOM, CHARLIE

.
As children, they have not gotten their spanking for many many years by Republicans. The cities slowly got worse and worse with many of the Prog politicians and related even playing games as we saw with defund the police. No wealthy Progs want the so-called riff raff progs anywhere near them in living areas. We have seen that enough as proof.
 
It's also much easier to protect people from cold weather. With hot weather you need AC, and a lot of the world does not have access to that kind of thing.
I've heard that Global Warming Doomsday Cult canard countless times. The data says the opposite. More people die from cold weather than hot weather. And I don't mean just a little bit more or twice as many. I'm talking about an order of magnitude more. And the reason for that is obvious to us real scientists. It's because we are warm blooded mammals living on a planet that is colder than optimal for our species.

So where did you hear the disinformation that you just parroted to the forum? Why did they lie to you?

THINK!!
 
Last edited:
It think its disingenuous, and dangerous, to say "the left" killed Charlie Kirk. But asking whether the killer was influenced by over the top leftist politics and criticism of Kirk is totally legitimate and worthwhile.

Well, judging by the thousands of social media entrys, one could say it is "the left".

Also, the left never holds back in accusing "maga" (70 million + americans), when they do something stupid.

Having said that, yes, I agree its dangerous, but I find it very hard to see sincerity when, since J6, leftys have painted a target on the back of anyone who supported Trump.

As ive said several times, what goes around has a tendency to come back around. Leftys didnt care when they were on the attack. It was "totally justified". Now that its coming back around, they say the rhetoric is dangerous.


I agree, we need to cool the temperature, but dammit, we need to make sure it stays cool, even when the maga ***** up again.
 
This is how insane the republican party is. Decades upon decades of research world wide, all trending in the same direction, and yet conservatives think it is all fake, and that world wide science is lying.

skepticalscience.com/The-question-that-skeptics-dont-want-to-ask-about-Climategate.html

You think it's to do with money, but the scientists making the most money are those scientists that are funded by the oil industry to spread misinformation.

And on the topic of money, why in the world would scientists all over the world be taking part in this conspiracy when they make shit money for the kind of qualifications they have? People don't tend to go into the field of science for the money. Especially in European countries where the money is terrible compared to what they could be making if they went into finance, or some other field where their skills would translate to. But instead, you are saying that they are committing what would be an evil act, of lying to world about climate change all for a terrible salary which would be higher if they took their skills elsewhere? Why would they do this?
And where to begin on how a co-ordination is able to occur on such a large scale? How did they corrupt it on a world wide scale and keep it hidden so well, without basically any leaks? How have they hidden this for so long? It would be impossible.

And why is it that basically every scientist that does come out against it is receiving funding from the oil industry?



Yes, the problem is the rapid warming that we are experiencing won't just stop at the point that it is comfortable. And the timeframe it is taking place over is extreme. It will have extremely negative effects on biodiversity. It's also much easier to protect people from cold weather. With hot weather you need AC, and a lot of the world does not have access to that kind of thing.

The reason that I asked this question is because someone said that the Democrats are lying to everyone, and I think the subject of climate change is a good subject to show the insanity of what you guys believe. It's not the Democrats that are lying on a mass scale. It's the republicans. It's Trump. Politicians lie, but Trump has lied at a rate so much higher than any president before.
^^ this is how insane the left is about climate change. Decades and decades of pseudoscience that never materializes into their claims, yet they insist it’s all still real.


Sorry bub, we’re done taking science lectures from biology deniers.
 
To answer your question without a dissertation as 'some' on this board seems to think it's
impressive. I have two words for you.
1. Nazis
2. Fascists

Yet they cannot back up these claims.


What about these two words that the right has been demonizing the left w/for decades here in America....?
1. Marxists
2. Communists

Where's the lie? In the words of the late, great, Charlie Kirk prove me wrong. I'm not speaking of all of them btw, just the people like the one who assassinated Kirk because he disagreed with him.
 
... The kid murdered Charlie because he thought he would be a hero for doing. Now - why do you think that is?
That's something I hope a thorough investigation will reveal. At this point I think it's what it looks like: wokist nut job "acts out". But we really don't know a lot yet.
 
That's something I hope a thorough investigation will reveal. At this point I think it's what it looks like: wokist nut job "acts out". But we really don't know a lot yet.


I feel like because a man lost his life that I shouldn't be laughing at this but I guess that I'm more like laughing at myself. 😆 I can still do that ya know. ;)
 
All this is true. But the thing that seemed to be the cause more than anything

in my pov

was trying to reason with DEMONS. He was too open for dialogue with people who are LOST.

Young people are not being raised properly... I saw this clip of a talk Kirk gave on illegals and this young woman didn't seem to listen to what he was saying, just wanted to go on and on about how.. Well, the Bible says Love your neighbor. .. etc.. Kirk said it is not unloving to have a secure border. She didn't even respond to t hat, but just brought up another psg in Exodus and etc... it went on like that several minutes.. She didn't respond to anything he said, just wanted to make her own points.

He visited college campuses.

Enough said?

Look at how few R professors there are there. The kids are being brainwashed... God knows what some of those professors said to these students, some of whom do not even have a completely formed brain yet... boys stop growing at age 25, not sure about girls, I think it is 18
You will find lots of Republican professors in the engineering and business schools. They are called liberal arts for a reason.
 
:auiqs.jpg:

thanks for reminding me of the Weekend at Bernie thing in the last admin

I never saw that movie but I would like to (heard people talk about scenes in it).

I just don't watch movies much... since they're made by Follywood. But that one sounds comical.. Is it a comedy?
You really don't need to see it because we lived it for 4 years.
 
The title of the article. You're exaggerating to make fun of conservatives right?
Actually, no. I think "wokist nut job" is a fair characterization, under the circumstances. That's what it looks like so far, but as I said, we don't know much yet.
 
Actually, no. I think "wokist nut job" is a fair characterization, under the circumstances. That's what it looks like so far, but as I said, we don't know much yet.


You believe in calling things woke? Did Hell just freeze over? It's dark outside so I can't tell if there are any flying pigs outside.
 
It think its disingenuous, and dangerous, to say "the left" killed Charlie Kirk. But asking whether the killer was influenced by over the top leftist politics and criticism of Kirk is totally legitimate and worthwhile.
I know it's absolutely 100% appropriate, *****! :1peleas:
PS: **** You! :fu:
 
15th post
You believe in calling things woke? Did Hell just freeze over? It's dark outside so I can't tell if there are any flying pigs outside.
I'm not sure what it means to "believe in calling things woke". My comment was just a guess, based on the info we have.
 
It's not "all trending in the same direction" liar. It is the most contentious issue in the history of science. There is no consensus. And that's a moot point because science doesn't work by consensus anyways.

And one side of the debate, your side, was proven to be fraudulent when a whistleblower leaked their emails to wikileaks.

They hid the decline, dude. Why are they hiding, truncating, deleting and fabricating data?

Why are they deceiving you? I challenge you to answer that question.
You're correct that science doesn't work on consensus. But when we are talking about the opinions of idiots on forums who think world wide science is corrupt vs what actual educated scientists world wide think, then I think it does have some valid use in an argument.
The whole, science doesn't work on consensus thing is more valid towards people that present evidence, and the evidence holds up from examination of it from people educated in that field. It's not for people that will choose a single instance of whistleblowing, which even then, has been investigated and the people have been cleared of wrongdoing, and use it to discredit all of science. You are not reasonable at all.
They hid the decline, dude. Why are they hiding, truncating, deleting and fabricating data?
Source on this?
Why are they deceiving you? I challenge you to answer that question.
Why would there be a world wide scientific conspiracy, where even the scientists that don't make that much money compared to the skills that they have all go along with this lie?
How would they hide this lie so well for so long? It doesn't make any logical sense. It doesn't hold up to the MOST BASIC of critical thinking.


And why don't you go to the following forum that is made up of scientists including those that are educated in this field, and pose to them your questions:


This era of republicans and their voters are not going to be remembered well in history. You literally chose politicians and oil funded sceintists over what the vast majority of science agrees on, and what the evidence shows. Embarrassing.
 
Kirk was killed by a lunatic weirdo that just didn't like him. The same reason that Charles Manson and his groupies killed Sharon Tate and the others. They were insane, bloodthirsty nutcases who were likely demon possessed. Tyler Robinson and his Sympatico's are no different than the Manson group. Living in a fantasy world with nothing to lose. Not political, nor revolutionary. They even give nihilists a bad name.
For YEARS the left has been calling their political opposition "fascists", and then when some young lefty puts "fascist" on a bullet meant to kill milk toast, reasonable, middle of the road, polite, conservative Charlie Kirk, you say "this isnt political at all". Meanwhile, your fellow dems sure think its political. They ******* LOVE IT!!! They LOVE that Charlie was killed by one of their own.
 
Back
Top Bottom