Why was Biden paid $900,000 a year by U of P when he didn’t teach a single class?

Usually, i don't bother to respond to your fever addled bullshit, as it pretty much seems to be the same ol' same ol' everytime you post. But, in this case, I'll make an exception..........

You DO realize that ANYONE who has gone to college long enough and has attained their PhD has the right to be called "doctor", right? It's not just for those who practice medicine.

Here.............lemmie help you out.................

Doctor is an academic title that originates from the Latin word of the same spelling and meaning.[1] The word is originally an agentive noun of the Latin verb docēre [dɔˈkeːrɛ] 'to teach'. It has been used as an academic title in Europe since the 13th century, when the first doctorates were awarded at the University of Bologna and the University of Paris.

Having become established in European universities, this usage spread around the world. Contracted "Dr" or "Dr.", it is used as a designation for a person who has obtained a doctorate (commonly a PhD/DPhil). In many parts of the world it is also used by medical practitioners, regardless of whether they hold a doctoral-level degree.


Interestingly enough, the title of "doctor" can even extend to members of the priesthood who are Catholic bishops in Ireland...................

Ireland[edit]​

Usage in Ireland is similar to that in the UK. The title of doctor is used for holders of doctoral degrees[158] as well as for medical practitioners (except surgeons),[159] dentists,[160] and vets.[161] The title is also used in Ireland for Catholic bishops, who are styled "The Most Reverend Dr X, Bishop of Y" on envelopes.[162]

So................while in your limited mind, the title of doctor only applies to those who practice medicine, I assure you that it covers a great deal more than that. You'd know that if you only had a brain.
i see, you dispute the fake doctor label, but not:
-the xidens are sick, demented LIARS....after all, he went to a black church in ITS teen years
oh, and the vp can leave confidential documents wherever they shit?
why would anybody in their right mind, want this corrupted pedophile leading AMERICA?
why would anybody in their right mind support, and defend the corrupt pedophile, xiden, or believe anything it spews
retards like you debate the meaningless shit, while ignoring the major FACTS, and TRUTH.....

IF YOU ONLY HAD A BRAIN
 
How many "talks" did he give for his annual $900K?


Listening to Biden talk, he should have to pay them. His droning BS is even worse than the droning BS talks organizations paid Hillary for and those were dreadful.
 
Listening to Biden talk, he should have to pay them. His droning BS is even worse than the droning BS talks organizations paid Hillary for and those were dreadful.
Of course you get to see clips of him at his worst 1000 times a day, brainwashed functional moron. They can do exactly the same thing with trump or anyone else. Ignoramus
 
Troll. He started the pen Biden center and led it. And you are absolutely clueless- $900,000 is fine. Why don't you ask why trump's son-in-law got $2 billion from Saudi Arabia, brainwashed functional moron? That's 2000 times as much, dipstick.

So, no link for all the talks you claim Biden gave for that $900,000. Got it, derp.
 
Nice work if you can get it. Don’t have to teach a class, barely have to make an appearance at the office, and yet get paid $900,000 a year for…..what? Any connection to the fact the the Communists donated $50 million to the university, and that some of Biden’s hidden top-secret documents were found in his office there?

My friend wants to know.

Because his Chinese friends laundered the bribe money through the university.
 
Troll. He started the pen Biden center and led it. And you are absolutely clueless- $900,000 is fine. Why don't you ask why trump's son-in-law got $2 billion from Saudi Arabia, brainwashed functional moron? That's 2000 times as much, dipstick.
Kushner didn’t get $2 billion from SA, Liar.

How many times will you clowns try to sell that lie?

The Saudis INVESTED THEIR money in his investment firm. It isn’t his money, it’s THEIRS, Dumbass.
 
Kushner didn’t get $2 billion from SA, Liar.

How many times will you clowns try to sell that lie?

The Saudis INVESTED THEIR money in his investment firm. It isn’t his money, it’s THEIRS, Dumbass.

You're right, ,they invested their money (2 BILLION) with Kushner's firm, even though many have said that it was a bad investment. And, even if the deal goes south, Kushner himself is still going to make 25 million off the deal for himself.


So, it wasn’t that difficult for people to put two and two together and infer that Kushner’s firm seemingly got $2 billion to invest—and at least $25 million to pocket regardless of performance!—as a thank-you for being so good to a human rights-abusing autocrat. And a new story from the Times suggests, somehow, even further shadiness than that.

Interestingly enough, Kushner formed that firm shortly after he left the WH.


WASHINGTON — The House Oversight Committee has launched an investigation into a $2 billion investment by the Saudi government into a firm formed by Jared Kushner after he left the White House last year.

And, the person who forced the deal through was the Saudi prince (who had Kashoggi killed), which Kushner had spent most of his time in the WH defending. Kushner's firm was also widely regarded as a shaky investment because of their inexperience................


Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince, a close ally during the Trump administration, despite objections from the fund’s advisers about the merits of the deal.

A panel that screens investments for the main Saudi sovereign wealth fund cited concerns about the proposed deal with Mr. Kushner’s newly formed private equity firm, Affinity Partners, previously undisclosed documents show.

Those objections included: “the inexperience of the Affinity Fund management”; the possibility that the kingdom would be responsible for “the bulk of the investment and risk”; due diligence on the fledgling firm’s operations that found them “unsatisfactory in all aspects”; a proposed asset management fee that “seems excessive”; and “public relations risks” from Mr. Kushner’s prior role as a senior adviser to his father-in-law, former President Donald J. Trump, according to minutes of the panel’s meeting last June 30.

But days later the full board of the $620 billion Public Investment Fund — led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler and a beneficiary of Mr. Kushner’s support when he worked as a White House adviser — overruled the panel.


Saudis said it was a bad deal, but they were overruled by bin Salman, who was the leader and the beneficiary of Kushner's support. Yeah...............nothing to see here, right?
 
You're right, ,they invested their money (2 BILLION) with Kushner's firm, even though many have said that it was a bad investment. And, even if the deal goes south, Kushner himself is still going to make 25 million off the deal for himself.


So, it wasn’t that difficult for people to put two and two together and infer that Kushner’s firm seemingly got $2 billion to invest—and at least $25 million to pocket regardless of performance!—as a thank-you for being so good to a human rights-abusing autocrat. And a new story from the Times suggests, somehow, even further shadiness than that.

Interestingly enough, Kushner formed that firm shortly after he left the WH.


WASHINGTON — The House Oversight Committee has launched an investigation into a $2 billion investment by the Saudi government into a firm formed by Jared Kushner after he left the White House last year.

And, the person who forced the deal through was the Saudi prince (who had Kashoggi killed), which Kushner had spent most of his time in the WH defending. Kushner's firm was also widely regarded as a shaky investment because of their inexperience................


Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince, a close ally during the Trump administration, despite objections from the fund’s advisers about the merits of the deal.

A panel that screens investments for the main Saudi sovereign wealth fund cited concerns about the proposed deal with Mr. Kushner’s newly formed private equity firm, Affinity Partners, previously undisclosed documents show.

Those objections included: “the inexperience of the Affinity Fund management”; the possibility that the kingdom would be responsible for “the bulk of the investment and risk”; due diligence on the fledgling firm’s operations that found them “unsatisfactory in all aspects”; a proposed asset management fee that “seems excessive”; and “public relations risks” from Mr. Kushner’s prior role as a senior adviser to his father-in-law, former President Donald J. Trump, according to minutes of the panel’s meeting last June 30.

But days later the full board of the $620 billion Public Investment Fund — led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler and a beneficiary of Mr. Kushner’s support when he worked as a White House adviser — overruled the panel.


Saudis said it was a bad deal, but they were overruled by bin Salman, who was the leader and the beneficiary of Kushner's support. Yeah...............nothing to see here, right?
Spin! Deflect!

wonder-woman-twirling.gif


wonder-woman.gif
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top