Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually, with Putin Russian people lives much better than in any other time in history. And, his regime is still good for the significant part of the world. At least it's pragmatic - they don't want to export socialism anymore.No, there is nothing worse for the Russian people or for the rest of the world than the monstrousity Putin has created.
It's not stupid. The Russians read American sources much more often than Americans (even those, who suppose to do it) read the Russian ones. And their list of restricted-to-discuss matters is much shorter than American one.You seem proud of putting out such stupid posts.
I told you, that there is no difference - since it is proven that democratic governments, simply rule as they like. And even if the respective party or coalition is replaced after 4 years - they rule in the exact same manner as the government before them.I guess you don't see a fundamental difference between an elected government and an autocratic one. I do. Whenever a democratic government does something the majority of voters don't approve of they risk getting thrown out of power. Something autocrats don't have to fear.
Nonsense - there is far less crime, violence and demonstrations in e.g. Vietnam, Singapore, China, N-Korea then any other democratic country.The number of violent people is greater in countries where the gov't is not seen as representing the people in question.
Other countries are none of your business - get your own democratic countries in line and order first. And no majority at all in Vietnam, Singapore or e.g. China has or will ever ask for Western democratic countries to help them. That is a typical Western countries stereotype illusion - and an excuse to bring in chaos into other countries.Nonsense, however if the government of a country doesn't represent the people being governed, we have an obligation to support the people of that country and not its government.
Yes - no doubt Russia violated international law, in regards to Ukraine. And so did NATO (unpunished) for a dozen other countries. So what's your failed point?Russia violated international law. Period. If Finland joins NATO will Russia invade them? What about the Baltic states?
See - you just confirmed again your arrogant, democratic warmongering attitude. And keep in mind that the global populations majority is not that of Western democracies.I have no idea where you get your numbers but it comes down to this. If you want to play ball with the West, you have to follow the rules the West laid down.
Dummy, Syria is ruled by the Ba‘ath Party - same as Iraq used to be, and they oppose Islamic fundamentalists and those who sponsor it. E.g. Iran, Saudi-Arabia and some of those other Gulf States. And Russia is simply aiding the Ba‘ath party to remain in power - they do not encourage and aid Syria (never have ) to attack neighbor countries.Is that any different from Russia's support of Syria's hereditary ruler, Bashar al-Assad?
You are not just ignorant but an obvious denier of facts - independent of the USA "supposedly" recognizing the one country, two systems principal - the USA provides military aid to a province that belongs to China (the biggest joke ever) - it constantly tries to upgrade Taiwan's status to that of an independent country, via pushing for UN affiliated associations e.g. WHO, WTO, etc to grant Taiwan access - whilst sending "official" US government representatives to a Chinese province, with whom they have no official diplomatic status.More nonsense. The US recognizes that Taiwan is a province of China. Judging by the current status of Hong Kong, Taiwan is in no hurry to go down that road.
You have no idea what the Russians do or don't do, so why do you keep making up these stupid lies?It's not stupid. The Russians read American sources much more often than Americans (even those, who suppose to do it) read the Russian ones. And their list of restricted-to-discuss matters is much shorter than American one.
Again, why do you continue to post such stupid lies. What it was put to a vote in the UNGA Russia was condemned by an overwhelming majority of nations.Actually, with Putin Russian people lives much better than in any other time in history. And, his regime is still good for the significant part of the world. At least it's pragmatic - they don't want to export socialism anymore.
Every country sees its own interests as most important. I don't think you'd find very many people in the US who think the two parties are exactly alike. They are different enough that over time the path of the US is moved in the direction people choose. That is the strength of democracy and the weakness of authoritarian systems.I told you, that there is no difference - since it is proven that democratic governments, simply rule as they like. And even if the respective party or coalition is replaced after 4 years - they rule in the exact same manner as the government before them.
China has a repressive government with powerful tools to watch over its people. Just look how the Hong Kong demonstrations were handled or their internet restrictiions. No one out side of China knows what the people really want since they have no voice.Nonsense - there is far less crime, violence and demonstrations in e.g. Vietnam, Singapore, China, N-Korea then any other democratic country.
And again give me a source that would proof, that the majority of people in e.g. Vietnam, Singapore or China would not see themselves as being represented by their government as they would like to be.
Nonsense - even autocratic countries are subjected towards demonstrations and revolutions - e.g. Iran - a formidable and most cruel secret service and it's potent military taken out by a discontent population within weeks and replaced by another autocratic system. And this goes for dozens of countries - only a despotic/idiotic dictator wouldn't recognize the danger of an unlimited policy - same as democracies, endless violent demonstrations and violent strikes and causing huge economic blow-backs to FORCE the government to alter it's cause.Every country sees its own interests as most important. I don't think you'd find very many people in the US who think the two parties are exactly alike. They are different enough that over time the path of the US is moved in the direction people choose. That is the strength of democracy and the weakness of authoritarian systems.
Foreigners who live and work in China - actually know very well what the Chinese people think of their own government. 80%+ are content and agree with their governments policy. Those who sometimes don't, especially in regards to specific issues - you can see them every day wherever in China demonstrating in public or in the respective online or mobile chats. as long no violence occurs or intentional false information is propagated no one is hindered or arrested. Off course Westerners in majority only listen to those who report negatively and false about China - since it fits their already abstruse mindset.China has a repressive government with powerful tools to watch over its people. Just look how the Hong Kong demonstrations were handled or their internet restrictiions. No one out side of China knows what the people really want since they have no voice.
Definitely, I know much more about them then you.You have no idea what the Russians do or don't do, so why do you keep making up these stupid lies?
Yeah, Igor, agree here. Preserving the Ukrainian state in any meaningful form is of a strategical importance.First of all, they need to finish the existence of the Ukrainian State.
You want to talk only Putin but are happy to talk about NATO's history.Yes - no doubt Russia violated international law, in regards to Ukraine. And so did NATO (unpunished) for a dozen other countries. So what's your failed point?
Refusing to do business with a country is not warmongering, it is the right of every nation to choose who they do business with.See - you just confirmed again your arrogant, democratic warmongering attitude. And keep in mind that the global populations majority is not that of Western democracies.
Ignoramus. Leaving aside the military interactions with Israel and Lebanon, the Ba‘ath Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Assad family. The father was President his brother was Vice-President and his son is now President. The Assads have ruled Syria for over 50 years.Dummy, Syria is ruled by the Ba‘ath Party - same as Iraq used to be, and they oppose Islamic fundamentalists and those who sponsor it. E.g. Iran, Saudi-Arabia and some of those other Gulf States. And Russia is simply aiding the Ba‘ath party to remain in power - they do not encourage and aid Syria (never have ) to attack neighbor countries.
China is doing its part to provoke an incident there. Making claims on the waters and building military islands.The US is constantly since Tsai Ing Wen took control over the Taiwan administration, openly inciting them to declare independence, increased arms supplies considerably. Whilst at the same time though not even being an UNCLOS signatory - trying to provoke a naval/military incident in the South-China-Sea.
I think the US has specifically NOT said what they'd do if the Chinese attempted a military invasion of Taiwan.Trying to get a warmongering alliance started around the South-China-Sea, via painting China to be an aggressive nation (A nation that hasn't attacked anyone in almost 45 years). Denying or circumventing the fact that ALL South-China-Sea states have laid the same territorial claims amongst each other. Taiwan even more then China and all others.
Lastly the USA has openly and officially declared to support MILITARILY a Taiwan administration that would opt for independence.
The expression here is that 'it takes two to Tango".So if democrat warmongers want to play ball with countries like e.g. Russia or China - they need to realize that they -NATO- are the intentional initiators of a possible military conflict, which is entirely different from their previous custom, of kicking around economic and military underdogs in the past 33 years.
So we agree that NATO has been a success.Again the globalist warmongers are NATO (Those "democratic" countries) - undoubtedly proven and almost non stop since 1990.
But please do show me where a non-democratic country attacked a NATO member, since 1990, or a democratic country - aside from the known cause of the Russia-Ukraine war.
Does that 80% number include the Taiwanese, the Tibetans, the Hui Muslims, residents of Hong Kong, and the Uyghurs?If you can't, keep your "democratic" nonsense to yourself. especially in regards to China, where 80%+ are absolutely not interested in a decadent Western democracy - that only works and acts in regards to elitist circles - furthering their own private $$ agendas on the back of it's population and the destruction of a countries customs and culture.
I think the difference is that democracies will change, authoritarian regimes will break.Nonsense - even autocratic countries are subjected towards demonstrations and revolutions - e.g. Iran - a formidable and most cruel secret service and it's potent military taken out by a discontent population within weeks and replaced by another autocratic system. And this goes for dozens of countries - only a despotic/idiotic dictator wouldn't recognize the danger of an unlimited policy - same as democracies, endless violent demonstrations and violent strikes and causing huge economic blow-backs to FORCE the government to alter it's cause.
No, have you?Have you been to HK during these demonstrations?
You are delusional. China is still trying silence HK dissenters, even those that fled, with bounties on their heads for life.There were absolutely no obstructions by the HK nor Mainland police - as long as these demonstrations were peaceful. People who called out for violence, committed violence or laid false claims were being rightfully arrested - do you even recall as to why these demonstrations were initiated? they had factually nothing to do at all with HK liberties.
Ukraine
Your posts show you know nothing about what is going on in Russia or what the Russian government or people are thinking, and that you have no idea what the rest of the world thinks of Russia.Definitely, I know much more about them then you.
Putin's war with Ukraine is entirely due to NATO's expansionist policy - when are you finally going to understand this?You want to talk only Putin but are happy to talk about NATO's history.
Embargoes and sanctions are political suppression tools - and have nothing to do with refusing to do business. But to blackmail/force another government into submission.Refusing to do business with a country is not warmongering, it is the right of every nation to choose who they do business with.
So what? The Lee family in Singapore owns more then half the country and has been ruling now for 60 years. Never made war on anyone - and is respected and approved by more then 70% of Singapore's population. And has never been sanctioned or denounced as being an enemy to democracy or the USA. However you can bet your ass - that if Singapore should openly side with China, that the same day, NATO will denounce them as being a repressive, non-democratic dictatorship.Ignoramus. Leaving aside the military interactions with Israel and Lebanon, the Ba‘ath Party is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Assad family. The father was President his brother was Vice-President and his son is now President. The Assads have ruled Syria for over 50 years.
It's China's territory and front garden - and not that of the USA, 5000mls away, furthermore not being a signatory of UNCLOS, and having incited or initiated every single war since 1990, so fuck off.China is doing its part to provoke an incident there. Making claims on the waters and building military islands.
You think WRONG - why don't you simply read up Biden's speeches and official declarations in that matter?I think the US has specifically NOT said what they'd do if the Chinese attempted a military invasion of Taiwan.
Where did Afghanistan "Tango" with the USA/NATO? or Syria? or Serbia, or Libya? or Iraq II? - are you a day-dreamer or what?The expression here is that 'it takes two to Tango".
If it comes to warmongering, destruction and killings - NATO/USA is undoubtedly the world No.1 since 1990. - for you that is obviously a success.So we agree that NATO has been a success.
Taiwan isn't ruled by Beijing you nitwit, the vast majority in HK doesn't have any issues with Beijing - why should they? they live and work exactly just as before, same goes for Macau.Does that 80% number include the Taiwanese, the Tibetans, the Hui Muslims, residents of Hong Kong, and the Uyghurs?
As I said earlier, I don't know what are they thinking. I know what they are speaking and writing.Your posts show you know nothing about what is going on in Russia or what the Russian government or people are thinking, and that you have no idea what the rest of the world thinks of Russia.
And Ukraininan government (actually, their puppet-masters - incompetent Biden's team) just eliminated any possibility of it.Yeah, Igor, agree here. Preserving the Ukrainian state in any meaningful form is of a strategical importance.
Sure, Odesa by September again and Kiev by November?And Ukraininan government (actually, their puppet-masters - incompetent Biden's team) just eliminated any possibility of it.
