Why the Olmecs did not stay in Ancient America. Blacks came to America before Columbus

[Failzero]

Even more striking is simply their technology.

The Sumerians were accomplished horse breeders and charioteers. And were masters of a two wheeled light chariot. This is an almost classic sign that a culture came from Central Asia as that is where all of the multiple civilizations that used chariots at that time originated out of.

And exactly what African cultures in that era are renowned for chariots or horse breeding? Even the Egyptians in that era had barely advanced chariots beyond a kind of cart that had solid wood wheels.

And if they had come "out of Africa", where did their horses come from? And how did they pass through Egypt, and the Egyptians not pick up some of their horses for breeding and learn how to improve their own chariots? Because when the two cultures did start to clash, their abilities shocked the Egyptians. That is something that would not have happened if they had already passed through their nation.

Oh, and they have some of the most extensive records of the ancient world. Even showing meetings with proto-Hebrews and what areas they allowed them to settle in. But strange, no mentions in any of their ancient historical records of a people passing through their territory with impressive horses and chariots. Only first meeting them once they moved into the Levant. Therefore, logically they could only have entered the Levant from somewhere other than Africa.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

"Sumerians of Africa"?

Oh dear lord, talk about a load of garbage!

Just to start with, Sumeria was in Asia, not Africa. So we can start with a huge geographical failure. If placed on a modern map, that is where Iraq and Syria are today. And that is very much not Africa.

And they did not even arrive at that area from Africa. Most though believe they came from modern Russia, as it is in keeping with both their chariots and other artifacts. If they had indeed come out of Africa, then their technology, culture and beliefs would have been closer to that of Egypt and the rest of the levant, and not so vastly different that few comparisons can be made between theirs and others in the region before them.

Sumerians were Black. Sumerians were Black. Sumerians were Black.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Just because someone makes money printing stuff you want to read and believe doesn't make it true.​

Sumeria: African Origins

The African Origins Of Sumeria explained

www.afrikaiswoke.com

The Evidence Against an African Origin​

There are many pieces of evidence that suggest that the Sumerians did not come from Africa. The most obvious is that they spoke a completely different language from any African language. They also had a different type of writing, called cuneiform, which was used in Mesopotamia for thousands of years before the first Africans arrived in the region.

Other evidence against an African origin for the Sumerians includes their physical appearance. The Sumerians were a light-skinned people with straight hair, while most Africans are dark-skinned with curly hair. In addition, the Sumerians were shorter than average for people from Africa.

Finally, there is no archaeological evidence to support the claim that the Sumerians came from Africa. There are no remains of early African settlements in Mesopotamia, and no African artifacts have been found in Sumerian sites.

The Sumerians came from Africa. The Sumerians came from Africa. The Sumerians came from Africa.

 

[Failzero]

Sumerians were Black. Sumerians were Black. Sumerians were Black.

Iraqi Sand Negros ?

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Iraqi Sand Negros ?

Better than cave dwelling Neandertals who ate raw meat.

 

[TNHarley]

The Sumerians came from Africa. The Sumerians came from Africa. The Sumerians came from Africa.

Recent DNA evidence suggests they were from the indus valley. Which would explain their relationship with them.

What Did the Sumerians Look Like: A Reliable Research

Uncover the mystery of the Sumerians' physical features through analysis of ancient inscriptions, DNA evidence, and archaeological findings. This article explores theories on their origins, language, and attire, offering insights into the enigmatic appearance of this pioneering Mesopotamian...

timelessmyths.com

 

[Mushroom]

The Sumerians came from Africa.

Yet somehow there is not a mention of them and their chariots and horses passing through Egypt to arrive in the Levant.

They are black as much as Cleopatra is black.

 

[Litwin]

They are black as much as Cleopatra is black.

 

[longly]

Yet somehow there is not a mention of them and their chariots and horses passing through Egypt to arrive in the Levant.

They are black as much as Cleopatra is black.

i agree; historical pollution, that's all it is .

 

[Mushroom]

i agree; historical pollution, that's all it is .

A great deal of this is all mostly revisionists trying to fictionalize history to suit their own beliefs.

Like the mistaken belief that the Indians were all tofu eating hippies that lived at one with nature and all that crap. That pisses me off to no end, as that is not true at all. There is a reason why sports teams and schools used "Braves" and "Warriors" with an Indian head as their mascot after all. Most had a warrior tradition as strong as others we recognize for that. Like say the Vikings, Mongols, Romans, and Spanish.

With most tribes even evolving different words for the role. In Shoshone, what most would think of as "Warrior" or "Brave" was Hoakkanten. But that was a fighter who would attack others not of the tribe. More akin in English to say "Raider". But they also had "Hoawoppih", who was somebody who also fought for the tribe, but in defense of them against outsiders. More akin to "Guardian" or "Defender". And most of the tribes would have two different chiefs. A "Peace Chief" that led the tribe during times of peace, and a "War Chief" that led them at times of war. And there were often conflicts in the tribe as to which one was dominant (with an influential Peace Chief even being assassinated so a War Chief could take charge). However, history tends to remember the War Chiefs because of the conflicts they would get into. Like Geronimo, Sitting Bull, and Crazy Horse. But not many remember Spotted Tail (who started as a War Chief before becoming a Peace Chief), Tekanawita, or Jigonhsasee.

Likely the only Peace Chief that is even remotely recognizable among most people is the Mohawk leader Ayenwatha, mostly recognized as "Haiwatha". But few likely know he was a real person, and a Peace Chief that helped found the Iroquois Confederacy. Longfellow simply hijacked his name and used it in a poem, but the inspiration was a real person.

Every time I hear some simpleton trying to claim my ancestors were all peaceful wanderers who lived at one with nature, I want to count coup by hitting them in the back of the head with a war axe.

 

[Unkotare]

...

Every time I hear some simpleton trying to claim my ancestors were all peaceful wanderers who lived at one with nature, I want to count coup by hitting them in the back of the head with a war axe.

You might want to see someone about that.

 

[Mushroom]

You might want to see someone about that.

Is not like I can actually do anything about the ones that chose to believe fantasies instead of reality.

 

[San Souci]

If they were here, they didn't do much with it. 95% whites built this country. The blacks hung around, did nothing and left. American Indians lived in tents, and didn't even have the wheel until Europeans arrived.

Yep. White MEN built America. Start with Vanderbilt ,Rockefeller ,Morgan ,and Carnegie. Then Stanford ,Crocker , Huntington , Gould ,and Hopkins. Then Edison ,Ford ,Tesla ,and the Wright Brothers.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Yet somehow there is not a mention of them and their chariots and horses passing through Egypt to arrive in the Levant.

They are black as much as Cleopatra is black.

Cleopatra was Black. So was Nefertitti.

 

[Mushroom]

Cleopatra was Black. So was Nefertitti.

Cleopatra was of Macedonian descent. Holy hell, she was not even "Egyptian". Does nobody learn history anymore?

It was known as the "Ptolemy Dynasty" for a reason! Her and all before her were descended from Ptolemy I Soter, who was born in Macedonia. For those that do not know geography, that is in modern Greece.

He was one of the generals of Alexander the Great, and after he died his Kingdom was split up between them. And if one looks at her family tree, it's rather interesting. Almost no intermarriage between outsiders in that dynasty. Uncles marrying nieces, brothers marrying sisters, cousins marrying, it was lots and lots of inbreeding, even more than most of the monarchs of Europe fifteen centuries later. I mean when Caesar arrived in Egypt, she was married to her own brother for goodness sakes! And that was not just politics, if not for the arrival of the Romans she would have born children by him who would have continued the dynasty.

And the chart above only follows the line of rulership. The actual entire family tree however is exactly the same. It is almost entirely incest from top to bottom.

A lot of historians express outright disgust at the Ptolemy family tree because it is almost entirely incestual. Very rarely do outsiders get brought into it, and those that did come in were almost entirely descended from other generals of Alexander the Great. I want to say one of the granddaughters of Seleucus I Nicator wed one of his grandsons, and a couple of others here and there. But once again, almost every single one a political marriage with others descended from Macedonians.

And holy hell, Nefertiti was not black either. The most absolutely irrefutable proof of that is the "Nefertiti Bust", currently on display in Berlin. It was made during her lifetime, and is panted with her skin tone.

For goodness sakes, it is only one of the most famous items from the 18th Dynasty. If she was black, one would think that the famous sculptor who had made it would have gotten her complexion right. And no "Nubian" would have become queen in ancient Egypt short of conquest (which never happened). Nubians were very much looked down upon in that era. There were almost constant wars between the two, and whenever Egypt was victorious they would expel all Nubians from their lands.

People trying to spread revisionist history are truly disgusting.

 

[Ms. Turquoise]

Cleopatra was of Macedonian descent. Holy hell, she was not even "Egyptian". Does nobody learn history anymore?

It was known as the "Ptolemy Dynasty" for a reason! Her and all before her were descended from Ptolemy I Soter, who was born in Macedonia. For those that do not know geography, that is in modern Greece.

He was one of the generals of Alexander the Great, and after he died his Kingdom was split up between them. And if one looks at her family tree, it's rather interesting. Almost no intermarriage between outsiders in that dynasty. Uncles marrying nieces, brothers marrying sisters, cousins marrying, it was lots and lots of inbreeding, even more than most of the monarchs of Europe fifteen centuries later. I mean when Caesar arrived in Egypt, she was married to her own brother for goodness sakes! And that was not just politics, if not for the arrival of the Romans she would have born children by him who would have continued the dynasty.

And the chart above only follows the line of rulership. The actual entire family tree however is exactly the same. It is almost entirely incest from top to bottom.

A lot of historians express outright disgust at the Ptolemy family tree because it is almost entirely incestual. Very rarely do outsiders get brought into it, and those that did come in were almost entirely descended from other generals of Alexander the Great. I want to say one of the granddaughters of Seleucus I Nicator wed one of his grandsons, and a couple of others here and there. But once again, almost every single one a political marriage with others descended from Macedonians.

And holy hell, Nefertiti was not black either. The most absolutely irrefutable proof of that is the "Nefertiti Bust", currently on display in Berlin. It was made during her lifetime, and is panted with her skin tone.

For goodness sakes, it is only one of the most famous items from the 18th Dynasty. If she was black, one would think that the famous sculptor who had made it would have gotten her complexion right. And no "Nubian" would have become queen in ancient Egypt short of conquest (which never happened). Nubians were very much looked down upon in that era. There were almost constant wars between the two, and whenever Egypt was victorious they would expel all Nubians from their lands.

People trying to spread revisionist history are truly disgusting.

That aint Nefertitti. She had dark chocolate skin, kinky hair, thick lips and a big nose. That sculpture is a fake.
Sorry to bust your bubble.

 

[Mushroom]

That aint Nefertitti. She had dark chocolate skin, kinky hair, thick lips and a big nose. That sculpture is a fake.
Sorry to bust your bubble.

Right. A fake over 5,000 years old. Along with all of the other statues recovered of her over the centuries. And the wall reliefs inside of tombs, those are all fake as well. Absolutely everything related to her and every other member of Egyptian royalty is a lie and fake.

Even all of the objects recovered from her son's tomb. All fake.

Wait, are you even aware that King Tut was Nefertiti's son? And she is depicted on several items in his tomb? So who exactly went in thousands of years ago to change that?

As I have always said, you can lead a horse to knowledge, but you can't make it think. And I am about done with this insanity.

 

[Failzero]

Cleopatra was Black. So was Nefertitti.

So now Greeks / Macedonians are black

 

[Failzero]

Dark Chocolatte Skin ?

 

[Failzero]

At this rate The Lindbergh Baby will be black in a few decades