Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
(PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, Cal Tech). Former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology.
This is so obviously a set up.
We see this when the official news release of WTC7 falling was a little early.
BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE - YouTube
electrical engineers aren't qualified to discuss collapses of high rise buildings.
Their opinions don't really matter.
Should i get my dentist's opinion too?
thats total nonsense ..the man worked as an engineer in the world trade center and can attest to the ease in which the core columns could be accessed as well he is backed in his opinion by world class physicist.. Structural engineers ...hardly comparable to your dentist
when will your group of "architects and engineers" reach 1% of the total engineering community?
Pathetic.
In almost 12 years, you can't even get 1%.
Just goes to show you how much interest there is in your idiotic claims.
Here's an idea for you eots. Go ask richard humenn to design your next high rise apartment for you. I'm sure you'll trust that he's a qualified "structural" engineer.
![]()
(phd in aeronautics and nuclear engineering, cal tech). Former head of the department of aeronautical engineering and assistant dean at the u.s. Air force institute of technology.
learn to read. I said structural and civil engineering or highrise architecture.
(phd in aeronautics and nuclear engineering, cal tech). Former head of the department of aeronautical engineering and assistant dean at the u.s. Air force institute of technology.
learn to read. I said structural and civil engineering or highrise architecture.
learn not to be an idiot..
But there was a giant building right next to it that fell down. You don't think at least some of WTC 1 or 2 might have possibly, could have, maybe hit 7 and done some serious damage? Some of that debris causing damage of it's own that led to fire lines being cut, a fire that rages out of control and weakened steel causing 7 to fall in on itself?
But that's somehow less likely than Ninja Demolition Crews.
building 6 was crushed by debris from building 1.
It stands to reason that when building 1 if falling apart and stuff is flying everywhere if some of it hits something (like say buildings 6 & 7) there's going to be some serious damage, maybe even enough damage to cause a collapse, either directly or from fire mains being severed and fires raging out of control.
Or we can chalk it up to ninja demolition crews.
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.
there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.
there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors
NIST says the construction was atypical of a highrise and you know this is true.
it had a large bottom entry area with no support columns.
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.
there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors
WTC 7's unusual construction allowed it to collapse after hourss of unfought fires.
there was nothing unusual about the construction of wtc 7 and the fires where scattered fires on a few floors
13 floors were burning
the madrid office tower collapsed in the steel-only section.there is no evidence 13 floors where burning..and office materials will only burn for approx 20 mins before the consume all combustibles in the area and spread tot he next 13 floors did all burn at once but NIST bogus computer model only works with sustained temperature throughout for 7 hrs..these where relatively small office fires.compared to known highrise fires that never collapsed