Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science

[ScienceRocks]

Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science



He makes some good points. What do you think?

 

[ScienceRocks]

This one is packed full of facts

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

 

[tyroneweaver]

The Chinese are making man made islands to launch military bases from.
They don't seem to worried about rising oceans drowning puppies.

 

[DarkFury]

This one is packed full of facts

You know Mutt, its time you joined the real world. Start with this...

 

[Anathema]

We have meteorologists who can't accurately predict Wednesday's weather today (Sunday), but I'm supposed to believe they can predict Global Climate Change? I don't think so.

 

[Crick]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

 

[BULLDOG]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

If something is real, not wanting to believe it doesn't make it any less real.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

If something is real, not wanting to believe it doesn't make it any less real.

If it's real there are facts to support it. You don't need to fall back on a belief.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

That proves my point, thanks. The Climate Cult is as devout as any and more intolerant than most.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science



He makes some good points. What do you think?

because it is faith based

so much so that it is about time

to pull a separation of church and state clause on it

 

[Kosh]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

Yes you just described the AGW religion as well as the far left religion..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

 

[Crick]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

Yes you just described the AGW religion as well as the far left religion..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

Please explain. Where do you find any of those features in climate science?

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Wrong.

RELIGION:
1.
a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a super human agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2.
a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects:
the Christian religion; the Buddhist religion.
3.
the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices:
a world council of religions.
4.
the life or state of a monk, nun, etc.:
to enter religion.
5.
the practice of religious beliefs; ritual observance of faith.
6.
something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience:
to make a religion of fighting prejudice.
7.
religions, Archaic. religious rites:
painted priests performing religions deep into the night.
**************************************************************

Climate science does not involve any supernatural or superhuman entities or processes. It does not involve the cause, nature or purpose of the universe. It's holdings are all the products of evidence, reason and the application of known scientific principles, not unsupported faith. The denier practice of calling it religion is nothing more than a weak and ineffective debating technique.

Yes you just described the AGW religion as well as the far left religion..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

Please explain. Where do you find any of those features in climate science?

I explained it on a child's level, there was no hidden meaning. Nor did I disparage climate science, you think I did due to your devotion to your faith.

 

[Crick]

You made an exclamatory statement. You "explained" nothing. I make no use of "faith" in my understanding and acceptance of climate science. The only "devotion" I might be said to possess is my belief that the scientific method is the best manner so far found to consistently approach the truth in our understanding of the functioning of the universe around us.

 

[skookerasbil]

Why People Don't Believe In Climate Science



He makes some good points. What do you think?

Nobody cares what this asshat says........nobody is caring about climate change in 2016. And t he AGW contingent can thank themselves for that. 20 years of bomb throwing has taken its toll. Voters don't give a smack..........and rightfully so. There are at least two dozen concerns that are far more important. Thankfully.......the American electorate agrees with me.


EDIT>> can happily post up poll graphs by request << EDIT

 

[RollingThunder]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Do you believe you are alive, imbecile? Do you believe the sun will rise tomorrow?

Only morons try to twist the semantics like you're trying to do, shitweasel.

Accepting scientific evidence and believing the testimony of experts is not in any way "religious". It is the sane activity of rational intelligent people.

Denying the scientific evidence and disbelieving the testimony of the experts because of your cult-like rightwingnut political and economic ideologies IS kind of pseudo-religious, or 'cultic'.....as well as irrational, stupid and insane.

 

[RollingThunder]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

If something is real, not wanting to believe it doesn't make it any less real.

If it's real there are facts to support it. You don't need to fall back on a belief.

You poor nitwit! There are mountains of "facts" supporting the conclusions of the world's climate scientists. THAT IS THE REASON THE SCIENTISTS "BELIEVE" IN THE REALITY OF HUMAN CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING.

in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence, you denier cult dimwits shut your eyes and shout la-la-la-la-la. THAT is why you are denigrated as deniers....that is "falling back on a belief".....in Rush Limpdick apparently.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

Do you believe you are alive, imbecile? Do you believe the sun will rise tomorrow?

Only morons try to twist the semantics like you're trying to do, shitweasel.

Accepting scientific evidence and believing the testimony of experts is not in any way "religious". It is the sane activity of rational intelligent people.

Denying the scientific evidence and disbelieving the testimony of the experts because of your cult-like rightwingnut political and economic ideologies IS kind of pseudo-religious, or 'cultic'.....as well as irrational, stupid and insane.

The sun doesn't rise, Einstein. Look, if you are going to criticize people have a grownup proof your posts first, mmmkay? You drooled all over your hate bib but didn't post any evidence. Like most religious cultists, the belief is good enough for you. Thanks for proven me right, yet once again.

 

[Iceweasel]

Your question illustrates the problem. Believing in something is a religious concept.

If something is real, not wanting to believe it doesn't make it any less real.

If it's real there are facts to support it. You don't need to fall back on a belief.

You poor nitwit! There are mountains of "facts" supporting the conclusions of the world's climate scientists. THAT IS THE REASON THE SCIENTISTS "BELIEVE" IN THE REALITY OF HUMAN CAUSED GLOBAL WARMING.

in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence, you denier cult dimwits shut your eyes and shout la-la-la-la-la. THAT is why you are denigrated as deniers....that is "falling back on a belief".....in Rush Limpdick apparently.

Yes, the consensus believes. Which would not be necessary with facts. Come back when you have some, your spittle soaked baby bib won't do.