- Mar 11, 2015
- 80,870
- 44,898
- 2,645
Lynchings by communities in the West could leave cow thieves hanging from trees for years and nobody'd ever know, because a lot of places where cattle were raised were remote expanses of several hundreds of acres per spread. They were frequent, and ranchers knew their hiding places because they were well-informed about criminals in the area as well as those who bore known crime characteristics, when last sighted and by whom. Some had army experience, others were knowledgable trackers, and they were together on ridding their areas of known thieves of cattle when their herds came up considerably short. A lot of the states were territories and had no blacks committing crimes in their areas. Thousands of people were lynched for stealing property, and it really wasn't appreciated by locals who responded by catching them red-handed with their "prizes" of items taken. With no judges nor justice systems around, they just did what had to be done to stop the pilfering, and that was to lynch cattle thieves, and you just didn't steal a man's transportational horse or horses, you didn't threaten his wife or children, and a number of other items. Without a judiciary, there are no records kept, and even when they were, law persons were kept so busy their record-keeping may have been on the slatern side.What are you ever talking about. The facts were made crystal clear on the Mueller Report.He won't be removed from office but an impeachment investigation with witnesses under oath may be able to bring out the facts. THEN the voters can decide based on facts and not allegations.Is there any justifiable reason to impeach President Trump less than one year before the next election, especially with zero chance that the Senate would vote to convict? Why not let the voters decide whether to remove him from office?
The answer seems to me that the entire impeachment idea is nothing more than partisan political theater designed to help raise campaign contributions from loony left donors.
If I am wrong, please explain why an impeachment inquiry should begin at this time and why it will not set a terrible precedent for the future.
Fact 1: Whoever claimed that President Trump was guilty of colluding with Russia was lying their ass off.
Fact 2: There was absolutely zero evidence that President Trump colluded with Russia:
(1) Trump did not collude with the RussiansThere is ample evidence that the Democrats have invested heavily in operatives in their party to carry the Socialism, anti-gun, and anti-Constitution messages out to the general public's attention online, and make their nihilism effective enough to take over America and kick out the Founder's America.
(2) None of Trump's associates colluded with the Russians
(3) The Steele Dossier Was tracked down to a source of writers who worked for the old Clinton War Room.
(4) The salacious story about a naked Trump, two prostitutes who peed on a bed slept in by Hillary Clinton at some earlier time and which made Hillary Clinton appear to look like a victim of a terrible act was 100% fiction from Hillary's fiction writer sources
(5) At the time of its creation, the Steel Dossier was assembled while Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State, and her office is responsible for the dissemination of the story into secret channels "accidentally" found by Democrat operatives in the FBI and CIA.
(6) The FBI role in disseminated in the story was tied to two operatives in the FBI both of who were recorded as biased against President Trump, as they planned and executed the frame job against President Trump, assuring that "surprised" FBI agents were mailed information by "sources" who operated anonymously.
(7) The FBI was informed that the information was not confirmed as the truth, but the FBI in charge of the frameup job made the egregious claim that it was confirmed as the truth, which in and of itself was a lie.
(8) It is clear that the House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY, and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-CA all knew from very early on that the Steele Dossier was not the truth, but each did his or her part to ensure it was dressed as the truth to fool the American voters in the last House of Representatives election in which the American voters were told that President Trump was in cahoots with the Russians. The entire Impeachment Hoax against President Trump was all a planned series of lies that set him up for a defeat, politely referred to as "an insurance policy" by both the House Democrats and the FBI leadership, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew exactly how to continue to destroy the Republican presidency and took every trick in the book to destroy this particular White House and cover up for In-crowd Democrats who took unfair shots at Trump supporters, Trump employees, and Trump family members.
(9) Maxine Waters also knew this was a lie and did her part to harass members of the Executive Branch in one of the worst offenses against the Constitution by a member of the House. She was allowed to carry on for months of damages to the President of the United States and the Republican Party. She still is heard from, from time to time, ranking on conservatives in the United States in one of the most elaborate coup attempts ever concocted to destroy the Constitution, the power of the Executive Branch, and the Supreme Court
They have made inroads into rewriting history through having Democrat operatives take over hiring in universities to produce pro-Democrat, anti-Constitutional professors to eliminate historical facts and replace them with snippets of details that support communism, which is the end goal of "socialism."
The Democrat initiative against religious prayer was effective. Schools can no longer start the school day off with prayer, and the Democrats have eliminated all Christian influences from their meetings by disallowing prayer which has heretofore been a tradition of the House of Representatives.
Democrats are destroying American confidence in the Founders by the false narratives in the form of rumors that this or that American Founder raped black women, engaged in acts of cruelty against innocent blacks (who actually were punished for murder, theft, and other crimes). This particular rewriting of history serves to subdue black students who are hit hard with emotions to think that all their ancestors were likely lynched, causing black children and some black adults to hate the word lynching. The grand omission is that for every black man who was "lynched" there were 100 whites who were lynched for crimes such as rape, stealing horses, stealing cattle, and stealing slaves and using them mercilessly that quite often resulted in sinister end-of-life experiences for human beings.
They have intentionally organized against the Christian and Jewish religions, both of which teach belief in God, belief in brotherhood, and caring for each other as tenets of faith in God. This takes away from political power that can absolutely control the masses of people we now have and helps democrats to consolidate power in their ambitiously hateful hands. Anything that diminishes their absolute power in every issue of life, Democrats seek to destroy, and they are currently pursuing it chiefly by bastardizing history to suit their end, which was and always will be absolute power by any means possible.
Democrats are pushing atheism as the vogue means of anti-religionism, because it is easier to control people socially if there is no knowledge of right and wrong in the population to stop them from doing bad things to people. This seems to be a thread that runs through organized takeovers of societies by communism, marxism, chaos, and militant rule in which death is the result of failure to observe even the smallest "law" put out by military leaders.
Can anybody read this and not understand that the person posting this is crazy? There were over 4,000 recorded lynchings in America. Over 3,000 were done to blacks. This is documented. What the founders did to slaves is also documented. You don't think for us, so don't try explaining how we think. Stormfront history doesn't count here.
I suggest you seek professional help.
You're demanding modern day tabulating from simple people, many of whom did not know how to read and write and used "X" for their signatures even on property deeds. You base your findings on what you want to know, not what actually happened. With there being zero black thieves out west and plenty of white ones, guess who got lynched more often. Common sense tells you, white ones exclusively were lynched in the great western expanses of cattle country in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
Sorry to rain you your pity party about being unable to claim boucoup lynchings for black when actually, they were quite rare. The only reason for expanding the handful of black lynchings by comparison to white lynchings is for modern reasons to pick the pockets of today's white people so Democrats can promise blacks free and steady income if they sign onto their bullshit so they can win elections and fry their opposition who is more appealing to Christian America because they are honest.
Keep up the hocus-pocus psychiatry malpractice and your own friends will abandon you.
You are getting pissed on with your mouth wide open. Everything you say here is wrong.
