Why Is Tucker Now Ashamed Of White Replacement Theory?

[sealybobo]

Tucker Carlson ‘Not Sure’ About Great Replacement Theory After Pushing It 400 Times

A recent investigation found the Fox News host had peddled the conspiracy theory hundreds of times since he took over a prime time spot in 2016.

news.yahoo.com

"Fox News host Tucker Carlson tried to distance himself Tuesday from the white supremacist “great replacement” theory he’s peddled on his prime time show for years. Carlson has spent years pushing the idea, and a New York Times investigation found he has promoted it in more than 400 episodes of his program since he joined Fox News’ prime time lineup in 2016. But Carlson said Tuesday he’s still unsure what the conspiracy theory is. "You’ve heard a lot about the great replacement theory recently, it’s everywhere … we’re still not sure exactly what it is,” the host said Tuesday."

Here is why Tucker is playing dumb about this whole great replacement theory....it is because, as of now, it is still widely unpopular to be in favor of it.....so you push the theory, and when called out - play dumb about it....in hopes it will become more popular in the future to where you can be more upfront about it -- or if it is defeated, you just pretend you were never in favor of it -- and come up with something else...pretty much how Conservatives did with the pro-segregation movement...when you are defeated, claim you were never for it and accuse the other side of doing it....

Example....Tucker claiming to not know what white replacement theory is and then claiming it was something created by Democrats.....so he is basically claiming Dems were so brilliant and powerful that they forced some white-nationalist French author guy (Renaud Camus) to come up with "great replacement theory" all the way back in the 1990's -- just to make Republicans look bad almost 30 years later?? Cool...so does that mean when that whole white nationalist march happened in Charlottesville -- and folks were going around yelling "Jews Will Not Replace Us" -- Democrats forced those guys to say that?? Cool...

Does that also mean that Dems even forced former Trump advisors Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller to be huge fans of the book "Camp Of The Saints" -- which basically laid the ground work for "white replacement theory" ?? In fact, when Steve Bannon wasn't talking about being upset that his daughter attends school with Jews; he said this about "immigration" -- not illegal immigration, but immigration in general....he said: “When we first started talking about this a year ago -- we called it the Camp of the Saints. … I mean, this is Camp of the Saints, isn’t it?”

Bannon, Adviser Behind Travel Ban, Is Fan of Novel About Feces-Eating Immigrants Destroying White Society

slate.com

What is Camp Of The Saints about? Why is Camp of the Saints believed to have laid the ground work for today's white replacement theory paranoia...well the book basically claims that "Dark-skinned immigrants are destroying white society" -- and talks about how they need to be slaughtered in order to stop them....sound familiar?? Sounds like that was exactly what the guy in Buffalo thought he was doing...again, like i asked earlier...why are Conservatives so ashamed to stand on the shit they have been pushing whenever a national spotlight gets shined on them?? When it happens, they scurry away like roaches...

hadit is trying to suggest that republicans aren't racist, it's liberals who are racist. If that's true, why are conservatives worried about whites being replaced? Seems like a pretty racist concern to me.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

hadit is trying to suggest that republicans aren't racist, it's liberals who are racist. If that's true, why are conservatives worried about whites being replaced? Seems like a pretty racist concern to me.

Now, I will grant them a benefit of a doubt and say -- ok, your fear of being replaced isn't racist....

It is still a stupid fear to have since the only reason "whites" aren't reproducing at numbers that white supremacists feel are high enough -- that has ZERO TO DO WITH OTHER RACES.....so one can say, they are erasing themselves

 

[sealybobo]

Now, I will grant them a benefit of a doubt and say -- ok, your fear of being replaced isn't racist....

It is still a stupid fear to have since the only reason "whites" aren't reproducing at numbers that white supremacists feel are high enough -- that has ZERO TO DO WITH OTHER RACES.....so one can say, they are erasing themselves

Exactly. I've said for years that to Republicans and the rich, we are all n*#rs. Now we see I was right. I hear whites at work crying they can't afford to put gas in their cars. Well now they know how blacks in ghettos have been living all these years. Finally they're getting a taste of it. So what do they want a raise? Do they want to unionize? What do they now want to do about the wealth gap between the super rich and rest of us? They defended those super rich all these years because they were white. They thought they belonged to a club but what they didn't realize is just being white and voting for Republicans doesn't get you a table at Mara Lago.

So they can't afford daycare, a wedding, college, insurance, kids, a home. And STILL they insist that it's Democrats fault and Republicans will fix it. HA!

I hope Republicans win both houses back this year and the white house goes to Trump in 2024. America deserves that. Let's see Republicans fix what Biden supposedly broke.

 

[PoliticalChic]

hadit is trying to suggest that republicans aren't racist, it's liberals who are racist. If that's true, why are conservatives worried about whites being replaced? Seems like a pretty racist concern to me.

1. The supreme benefit of controlling the dissemination of informaton allows the Leftists/Democrats to define words to their benefit.
Such is the case with the proven attempt to alter the electorate to favor Democrats, by flooding the nation with unskilled, uneducated illegal aliens largely from corrupt and criminal societies.



2. But that's not how the Democrats explain 'Replacement Theory:'
And in the use of the Buffalo shooting, we see how cleverly the Democrats can use an event to erase a threatening argument against them.....even when the argument is true and accurate.
The catch phrase used by the demented shooter in Buffalo is "replEacement theory," and here is NPR's definition:
"...the "Great Replacement" is a conspiracy theory that states that non-white individuals are being brought into the United States and other Western countries to "replace" white voters to achieve a political agenda. It is often touted by anti-immigration groups, white supremacists and others, according to the National Immigration Forum."

What is the 'Great Replacement' and how is it tied to the Buffalo shooting suspect?​

The suspect allegedly wrote a 180-page document filled with hateful rants about race and ties to the conspiracy theory, "Great Replacement".

www.npr.org


3. Demorats have trained their voters to see everything through the prism of race.
This issue is more correctly seen as a welfare, or economics, issue.

“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole




4. The claim is that the economy needs these illegals.
"...undocumented immigrants are paying billions of dollar in taxes into state and local coffers, and that substantially more would be generated if President Obama prevails in imposing a new executive order protecting many of those workers from deportation."
Study Finds Illegal Immigrants Pay $11.8B in Taxes

But the facts aren't their friend... “The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy

[So much for that fable.]
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives

Immigrants, espeically illegal immigrants, are enticed in by the Democrats for one reason: to vote, and vote Democrat.





5. "Republican objections to the Democrat plan would be exactly the same if Democrats were importing blonde-haired blue-eyed yodeling Scandinavians to shift the US electorate to the Left. In medieval scholastic terminology, what Republicans object to is only per accidens, not per se (accidentally, not essentially) about race. Republicans object to the importation of a political persuasion, not a specific race, into the country in order to achieve political power. It is only the Democrat’s explicit racist plan to use “persons of color” to shift the demographics to secure their hold on power that brings race into the issue!"

The Latest Hoax By Democrats And Their Media... Great Replacement Theory​

Democrats claim that they are not using mass immigration to shift the demographics of America while simultaneously doing exactly that.
thebluestateconservative.com




Every word from the Democrats is a lie.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Exactly. I've said for years that to Republicans and the rich, we are all n*#rs. Now we see I was right. I hear whites at work crying they can't afford to put gas in their cars. Well now they know how blacks in ghettos have been living all these years. Finally they're getting a taste of it. So what do they want a raise? Do they want to unionize? What do they now want to do about the wealth gap between the super rich and rest of us? They defended those super rich all these years because they were white. They thought they belonged to a club but what they didn't realize is just being white and voting for Republicans doesn't get you a table at Mara Lago.

So they can't afford daycare, a wedding, college, insurance, kids, a home. And STILL they insist that it's Democrats fault and Republicans will fix it. HA!

I hope Republicans win both houses back this year and the white house goes to Trump in 2024. America deserves that. Let's see Republicans fix what Biden supposedly broke.

I understand your sentiment about hoping Republicans have full control -- but I hope that isn't the case....


Since the reason those Republicans would even have full control is due to the fact that a majority of Americans are ok with austerity cuts being imposed on them in exchange for "getting revenge against the others" for whatever grievance they believe they have...




Lee Atwater described this perfectly when he was talking about the Southern strategy and how he was able to convince poor whites in the South to vote against their own interests...he said...

"You start out in 1954 by saying, “Ngger, ngger, ngger.” By 1968 you can’t say “ngger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Ngger, ngger.”

 

[sealybobo]

1. The supreme benefit of controlling the dissemination of informaton allows the Leftists/Democrats to define words to their benefit.
Such is the case with the proven attempt to alter the electorate to favor Democrats, by flooding the nation with unskilled, uneducated illegal aliens largely from corrupt and criminal societies.



2. But that's not how the Democrats explain 'Replacement Theory:'
And in the use of the Buffalo shooting, we see how cleverly the Democrats can use an event to erase a threatening argument against them.....even when the argument is true and accurate.
The catch phrase used by the demented shooter in Buffalo is "replEacement theory," and here is NPR's definition:
"...the "Great Replacement" is a conspiracy theory that states that non-white individuals are being brought into the United States and other Western countries to "replace" white voters to achieve a political agenda. It is often touted by anti-immigration groups, white supremacists and others, according to the National Immigration Forum."

What is the 'Great Replacement' and how is it tied to the Buffalo shooting suspect?​

The suspect allegedly wrote a 180-page document filled with hateful rants about race and ties to the conspiracy theory, "Great Replacement".

www.npr.org


3. Demorats have trained their voters to see everything through the prism of race.
This issue is more correctly seen as a welfare, or economics, issue.

“In all, nearly 60 percent of immigrants—legal and illegal—are on government assistance, compared with 39 percent of native households. Why would any country voluntarily bring in people who have to be supported by the taxpayer?”
― Ann Coulter, ¡Adios, America!: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country into a Third World Hellhole




4. The claim is that the economy needs these illegals.
"...undocumented immigrants are paying billions of dollar in taxes into state and local coffers, and that substantially more would be generated if President Obama prevails in imposing a new executive order protecting many of those workers from deportation."
Study Finds Illegal Immigrants Pay $11.8B in Taxes

But the facts aren't their friend... “The conservative Heritage Foundation estimated unlawful immigrant households paid $39.2 billion in 2010, but received $93.7 billion in government services.” -- Oliver Darcy

[So much for that fable.]
15 Stats That Destroy Liberal Narratives

Immigrants, espeically illegal immigrants, are enticed in by the Democrats for one reason: to vote, and vote Democrat.





5. "Republican objections to the Democrat plan would be exactly the same if Democrats were importing blonde-haired blue-eyed yodeling Scandinavians to shift the US electorate to the Left. In medieval scholastic terminology, what Republicans object to is only per accidens, not per se (accidentally, not essentially) about race. Republicans object to the importation of a political persuasion, not a specific race, into the country in order to achieve political power. It is only the Democrat’s explicit racist plan to use “persons of color” to shift the demographics to secure their hold on power that brings race into the issue!"

The Latest Hoax By Democrats And Their Media... Great Replacement Theory​

Democrats claim that they are not using mass immigration to shift the demographics of America while simultaneously doing exactly that.
thebluestateconservative.com




Every word from the Democrats is a lie.

Too long no one looked through this drivel.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I understand your sentiment about hoping Republicans have full control -- but I hope that isn't the case....


Since the reason those Republicans would even have full control is due to the fact that a majority of Americans are ok with austerity cuts being imposed on them in exchange for "getting revenge against the others" for whatever grievance they believe they have...




Lee Atwater described this perfectly when he was talking about the Southern strategy and how he was able to convince poor whites in the South to vote against their own interests...he said...

"You start out in 1954 by saying, “Ngger, ngger, ngger.” By 1968 you can’t say “ngger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “Ngger, ngger.”

Lee Atwater was lying.


1. There never was any such Southern Strategy.



2. The truth, … is the opposite: the growth of GOP support among white Southerners was steady and mostly gradual from 1928 to 2010, … What retarded the Southern switch from the Democrats to the GOP was a combination of party loyalties dating back to Reconstruction and the Democrats’ use of racial issues. In other words, if you take race out of the picture, it’s likely that white Southerners would have switched parties earlier and in greater numbers. “ The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority










3. Unable to comprehend that Southern Americans are not the racists that the Democrats are, they had to find some explanation for their ancient base, the South, turning to vote Republican. Sooo….they claimed that Nixon campaigned as a racist to gain the Deep South, to win over the Dixiecrats and segregationists to the Republican fold.

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.




4. “The two biggest issues in the 1968 campaign were the Vietnam War…and the anti-war movement….
Nixon campaigned on a strong anti-communist, law and order platform. While embracing the welfare state- Nixon was no conservative on domestic issues- he also railed against what he termed ‘the excesses of bleeding heart liberalism.’”
"Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 203





5. ”Liberal neurotic obsession with this apocryphal notion- (that Southern Strategy) it’s been cited hundreds of times in the NYTimes- is supposed to explain why Democrats can’t get nice churchgoing, patriotic southerners to vote for the party of antiwar protesters, abortion, the ACLU and gay marriage.
They tell themselves it’s because they won’t stoop to pander to a bunch of racists. This slander should probably be the first clue as to why southerners don’t like them.

The central premise of this folklore is that anyone who votes Republican is a racist. Pretty sophisticated thinking.”
Coulter, Mugged




The Democrat Party has always been the party of the bullwhip and lynching, slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.


The party of really stupid people.....as you have proven.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Lee Atwater was lying.


1. There never was any such Southern Strategy.



2. The truth, … is the opposite: the growth of GOP support among white Southerners was steady and mostly gradual from 1928 to 2010, … What retarded the Southern switch from the Democrats to the GOP was a combination of party loyalties dating back to Reconstruction and the Democrats’ use of racial issues. In other words, if you take race out of the picture, it’s likely that white Southerners would have switched parties earlier and in greater numbers. “ The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority










3. Unable to comprehend that Southern Americans are not the racists that the Democrats are, they had to find some explanation for their ancient base, the South, turning to vote Republican. Sooo….they claimed that Nixon campaigned as a racist to gain the Deep South, to win over the Dixiecrats and segregationists to the Republican fold.

Of course, problem #1 is that the Democrats cannot provide a single example of an explicitly racist pitch in the campaign. There never was one.




4. “The two biggest issues in the 1968 campaign were the Vietnam War…and the anti-war movement….
Nixon campaigned on a strong anti-communist, law and order platform. While embracing the welfare state- Nixon was no conservative on domestic issues- he also railed against what he termed ‘the excesses of bleeding heart liberalism.’”
"Death Of A Nation,” Dinesh D’Souza, p. 203





5. ”Liberal neurotic obsession with this apocryphal notion- (that Southern Strategy) it’s been cited hundreds of times in the NYTimes- is supposed to explain why Democrats can’t get nice churchgoing, patriotic southerners to vote for the party of antiwar protesters, abortion, the ACLU and gay marriage.
They tell themselves it’s because they won’t stoop to pander to a bunch of racists. This slander should probably be the first clue as to why southerners don’t like them.

The central premise of this folklore is that anyone who votes Republican is a racist. Pretty sophisticated thinking.”
Coulter, Mugged




The Democrat Party has always been the party of the bullwhip and lynching, slavery, segregation and second class citizenship.


The party of really stupid people.....as you have proven.

Do you know how pathetic you have to be to tell a person who was a chief political advisor for both NIXON and REAGAN that he is lying...


Even tho the exact thing he described is exactly what happened and is still happening...


Furthermore, how pathetic must you be to keep being so ashamed of the Southern strategy, that you will call anyone who ACKNOWLEDGED IT, a liar...


Well I guess that GOP Chairman who came out and apologized for the Southern Strategy is lying too.....both of them...because two separate chairmans admitted to its use and apologized...were they liars??

"By the '70s and into the '80s and '90s, the Democratic Party solidified its gains in the African American community, and we Republicans did not effectively reach out -- Some Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong."

-- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


And then again....another GOP chairman acknowledged it and apologized on record...

“For the last 40-plus years we had a ‘Southern Strategy’ that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South. Well, guess what happened in 1992, folks, ‘Bubba’ went back home to the Democratic Party and voted for Bill Clinton.”

-- Michael Steele, the Republican National Committee chairman 2010

And just for the cherry on top...let's go back to another apology issued by a GOP chairman about using homophobia for votes......

“As I’ve been involved in the fight for marriage equality, one of the things I’ve learned is how many people were harmed by the campaigns in which I was involved. I apologize to them and tell them I am sorry." -- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


Now are you also going to claim that the GOP didn't and still does try to use homophobia and fearmongering over trans people for political gain?? Are you going to claim all of these people are lying? Cool..you should ask yourself...why do Republicans lie so much about their own party's positions??


Now you will go on to type 40 more paragraphs of rambling about nothing -- but you won't do is FACTUALLY REFUTE A SINGLE THING I SAID

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you know how pathetic you have to be to tell a person who was a chief political advisor for both NIXON and REAGAN that he is lying...


Even tho the exact thing he described is exactly what happened and is still happening...


Furthermore, how pathetic must you be to keep being so ashamed of the Southern strategy, that you will call anyone who ACKNOWLEDGED IT, a liar...


Well I guess that GOP Chairman who came out and apologized for the Southern Strategy is lying too.....both of them...because two separate chairmans admitted to its use and apologized...were they liars??

"By the '70s and into the '80s and '90s, the Democratic Party solidified its gains in the African American community, and we Republicans did not effectively reach out -- Some Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong."

-- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


And then again....another GOP chairman acknowledged it and apologized on record...

“For the last 40-plus years we had a ‘Southern Strategy’ that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South. Well, guess what happened in 1992, folks, ‘Bubba’ went back home to the Democratic Party and voted for Bill Clinton.”

-- Michael Steele, the Republican National Committee chairman 2010

And just for the cherry on top...let's go back to another apology issued by a GOP chairman about using homophobia for votes......

“As I’ve been involved in the fight for marriage equality, one of the things I’ve learned is how many people were harmed by the campaigns in which I was involved. I apologize to them and tell them I am sorry." -- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


Now are you also going to claim that the GOP didn't and still does try to use homophobia and fearmongering over trans people for political gain?? Are you going to claim all of these people are lying? Cool..you should ask yourself...why do Republicans lie so much about their own party's positions??


Now you will go on to type 40 more paragraphs of rambling about nothing -- but you won't do is FACTUALLY REFUTE A SINGLE THING I SAID

Atwater was a liar, and you are a sucker.
See if you can find a single error in my post.


The Democrat Party has always been the party of this.....see if there is a single error here, either:




1.Doubling down on their support for slavery and segregation, the Democrat Party blocked every anti-lynching to come to the Senate.



2. Dragging their feet on post-war freedom for their slaves, they imposed poll taxes and Jim Crow laws.



3. The Obama ‘Promise Program’ made it almost impossible to remove thugs and criminals from ghetto schools, to make certain that learning was impeded.



4. Authored gun laws that only law abiding citizens would obey, preventing black citizens in crime ridden neighborhood from protecting themselves.



5. Promoted bogus anti-police hatred, while ignoring some 350,000 blacks killed by lawless blacks. 324,000 U.S. Blacks Killed by Blacks In Only 35 Years – American Free Press



6. In nearing a century of Democrat welfare, blacks remain as the lowest income racial group.



7. Allied with the International Left, the Democrat party makes certain that racial animosity never dies down.



8. The Democrats made and make certain that religion and morality is barred from the schools and from the public arena. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro





9. The Democrat judicial system is based on the idea that all blacks are felons, so felons must be released from jails. Carter-appointed judge Norma Shapiro “ is one of the worst offenders among that influential cadre of federal judges who have substituted the ACLU's prisoners' rights wish list for the Bill of Rights and have trifled with public safety concerns. …” In 1992, black youths were nine times more likely to be murdered than white youths. Democrats lied, kids died.



10. The party of the bullwhip, and plantations and slavery, of Nathan Bedford Forrest, the KKK and Jim Crow, the party of barring black children from schools, has become more efficient today:

"Massive increase in Black Americans murdered was result of defund police movement: experts
Black Americans were disproportionately affected by the skyrocketing murders of 2020"

Massive increase in Black Americans murdered was result of defund police movement: experts



Black Americans saw a greater spike in murders in 2020 compared to years prior, and at a higher rate than the national increase.

www.foxnews.com



But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.

But wait…..they did manage to ban one single word from common parlance.

What I have said is that the Democrats/Liberals have done so, largely by
a. abandoning marriage and normalizing out of wedlock births
b. removing punishments for lawlessness as though all black Americans are criminals.
c. never criticizing the psychopathologies that too many black youths mirror.
d. demanding that thugs and criminals be kept in government school.
e. lying about police and whites in general.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Do you know how pathetic you have to be to tell a person who was a chief political advisor for both NIXON and REAGAN that he is lying...


Even tho the exact thing he described is exactly what happened and is still happening...


Furthermore, how pathetic must you be to keep being so ashamed of the Southern strategy, that you will call anyone who ACKNOWLEDGED IT, a liar...


Well I guess that GOP Chairman who came out and apologized for the Southern Strategy is lying too.....both of them...because two separate chairmans admitted to its use and apologized...were they liars??

"By the '70s and into the '80s and '90s, the Democratic Party solidified its gains in the African American community, and we Republicans did not effectively reach out -- Some Republicans gave up on winning the African American vote, looking the other way or trying to benefit politically from racial polarization. I am here today as the Republican chairman to tell you we were wrong."

-- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


And then again....another GOP chairman acknowledged it and apologized on record...

“For the last 40-plus years we had a ‘Southern Strategy’ that alienated many minority voters by focusing on the white male vote in the South. Well, guess what happened in 1992, folks, ‘Bubba’ went back home to the Democratic Party and voted for Bill Clinton.”

-- Michael Steele, the Republican National Committee chairman 2010

And just for the cherry on top...let's go back to another apology issued by a GOP chairman about using homophobia for votes......

“As I’ve been involved in the fight for marriage equality, one of the things I’ve learned is how many people were harmed by the campaigns in which I was involved. I apologize to them and tell them I am sorry." -- Ken Mehlman, the Republican National Committee chairman 2005


Now are you also going to claim that the GOP didn't and still does try to use homophobia and fearmongering over trans people for political gain?? Are you going to claim all of these people are lying? Cool..you should ask yourself...why do Republicans lie so much about their own party's positions??


Now you will go on to type 40 more paragraphs of rambling about nothing -- but you won't do is FACTUALLY REFUTE A SINGLE THING I SAID

Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly, lying kisser.



Eisenhower received at least one-third of the vote in every state in the Old Confederacy.

The same is true for Nixon in 1960, when the pro-Civil Rights Nixon, who…was representing an Administration that enforced Brown v. Board, carried Virginia, Tennessee and Florida. ….Republicans picked up their first elected Southern Senate seat in history in a 1960 special election shortly after the election.

In 1964, Goldwater did break through in the Deep South. “
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority




“The second trendline in the data is ideology.
To accept the Southern Strategy myth that race is the dominant reason why white Southerners would find a home in the GOP, you have to ignore the role of (among other issues) economics, religion, and foreign policy/national security. “
Op.Cit.


Soooo….why did the South end up in the Republican camp? Not due to the preposterous and slanderous allegations of the Democrats, i.e., that they’re all racists, both the Southern voters and the Republican Party.
Here is the answer in microcosm: because neither the Southern voter nor the GOP is racist:


a. 1966 Republican Bo Calloway ran against Democrat Lester Maddox, who “gained national attention for refusing to serve blacks in his popular cafeteria near the Georgia Tech campus. Newsmen tipped off about the confrontation reported how restaurant patrons and employees wielded ax handles while Mr. Maddox waved a pistol. …”
About Questia | Questia, Your Online Research Library

Maddox was endorsed by Democrat Jimmy Carter in the above governor’s race. When the race was too close to call, the Democrat state legislature gave it to Maddox.


b.1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.”
Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia



c.1966- pro-integrationist Republican Winthrop Rockefeller won Arkansas, replacing Bill Clinton-pal Orval Faubus.




Not all Democrats were segregationists, but all segregationists were Democrats! And…there were enough of them to demand compliance from the rest of the party.




One would imagine that, in the face of this onslaught of facts that they can’t refute, the Democrat voters would change their support.
They won’t because they can’t: for the weak mind, indoctrination is indelible.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Watch me smash another custard pie in your ugly, lying kisser.



Eisenhower received at least one-third of the vote in every state in the Old Confederacy.

The same is true for Nixon in 1960, when the pro-Civil Rights Nixon, who…was representing an Administration that enforced Brown v. Board, carried Virginia, Tennessee and Florida. ….Republicans picked up their first elected Southern Senate seat in history in a 1960 special election shortly after the election.

In 1964, Goldwater did break through in the Deep South. “
The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority




“The second trendline in the data is ideology.
To accept the Southern Strategy myth that race is the dominant reason why white Southerners would find a home in the GOP, you have to ignore the role of (among other issues) economics, religion, and foreign policy/national security. “
Op.Cit.


Soooo….why did the South end up in the Republican camp? Not due to the preposterous and slanderous allegations of the Democrats, i.e., that they’re all racists, both the Southern voters and the Republican Party.
Here is the answer in microcosm: because neither the Southern voter nor the GOP is racist:


a. 1966 Republican Bo Calloway ran against Democrat Lester Maddox, who “gained national attention for refusing to serve blacks in his popular cafeteria near the Georgia Tech campus. Newsmen tipped off about the confrontation reported how restaurant patrons and employees wielded ax handles while Mr. Maddox waved a pistol. …”
About Questia | Questia, Your Online Research Library

Maddox was endorsed by Democrat Jimmy Carter in the above governor’s race. When the race was too close to call, the Democrat state legislature gave it to Maddox.


b.1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.”
Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia



c.1966- pro-integrationist Republican Winthrop Rockefeller won Arkansas, replacing Bill Clinton-pal Orval Faubus.




Not all Democrats were segregationists, but all segregationists were Democrats! And…there were enough of them to demand compliance from the rest of the party.




One would imagine that, in the face of this onslaught of facts that they can’t refute, the Democrat voters would change their support.
They won’t because they can’t: for the weak mind, indoctrination is indelible.

Nothing you typed refuted a single thing I said...do you understand that??


You are a clown...a buckdancing minstrel, clown...


i will let MLK sum it up for me -- since you racist dic suckers like to try to claim him as your own now...

What was the Cow Palace, MLK mentioned in this quote?


Allow me to educate you......the 1964 Republican Convention took place at Daly City’s Cow Palace. MLK was there to convince the REPUBLICAN party to adopt the Civil Rights Act as part of the party’s platform.

"Members on the committee strongly disavowed King’s call for support of the Civil Rights Act, and they ended up voting 68–31 to reject the initiative on the party’s platform."


King was also speaking in defense of the Rumsford Housing Act; which was legislation to end the practice of racial discrimination in housing...that too was OPPOSED BY CONSERVATIVES...which prompted MLK to issue that quote...because not only did Conservatives reject both MLK's plea for the Republican party to adopt the Civil Rights Act -- they were also AGAINST the policy to end racial discrimination in housing...and whom did the GOP nominate as their presidential nominee that year...the main OPPONENT to the Civil Rights Act...

Barry Goldwater

The Story Behind MLK’s Visit to San Francisco in 1964

He spoke out against housing policies that harmed Black people — a continuing issue today

thebolditalic.com

So shut yo BITCH ASS UP...you are not smart enough to try to run that bullshit by me.,...

 

[BrokeLoser]

hadit is trying to suggest that republicans aren't racist, it's liberals who are racist. If that's true, why are conservatives worried about whites being replaced? Seems like a pretty racist concern to me.

Yep, Biff_Poindexter ’s boy Thomas Sowell is such a racist.

“But if you don't have the instinct for self-preservation, it will not matter much in the long run whatever else you may have.”

Thomas Sowell - Will Orlando Change Anything?

jewishworldreview.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nothing you typed refuted a single thing I said...do you understand that??


You are a clown...a buckdancing minstrel, clown...


i will let MLK sum it up for me -- since you racist dic suckers like to try to claim him as your own now...

View attachment 653500


What was the Cow Palace, MLK mentioned in this quote?


Allow me to educate you......the 1964 Republican Convention took place at Daly City’s Cow Palace. MLK was there to convince the REPUBLICAN party to adopt the Civil Rights Act as part of the party’s platform.

"Members on the committee strongly disavowed King’s call for support of the Civil Rights Act, and they ended up voting 68–31 to reject the initiative on the party’s platform."


King was also speaking in defense of the Rumsford Housing Act; which was legislation to end the practice of racial discrimination in housing...that too was OPPOSED BY CONSERVATIVES...which prompted MLK to issue that quote...because not only did Conservatives reject both MLK's plea for the Republican party to adopt the Civil Rights Act -- they were also AGAINST the policy to end racial discrimination in housing...and whom did the GOP nominate as their presidential nominee that year...the main OPPONENT to the Civil Rights Act...

Barry Goldwater

The Story Behind MLK’s Visit to San Francisco in 1964

He spoke out against housing policies that harmed Black people — a continuing issue today

thebolditalic.com

So shut yo BITCH ASS UP...you are not smart enough to try to run that bullshit by me.,...

That's the language with which you were addressed growing up????


So sad......

You need to get a good lawyer and sue those who were supposed to live you, rather than abuse you thus.




So you admit you couldn't find a single error in any of my posts?????


You're also admitting you're a sucker, Puffy.

 

[Mac-7]

Tucker Carlson ‘Not Sure’ About Great Replacement Theory After Pushing It 400 Times

A recent investigation found the Fox News host had peddled the conspiracy theory hundreds of times since he took over a prime time spot in 2016.

news.yahoo.com

"Fox News host Tucker Carlson tried to distance himself Tuesday from the white supremacist “great replacement” theory he’s peddled on his prime time show for years. Carlson has spent years pushing the idea, and a New York Times investigation found he has promoted it in more than 400 episodes of his program since he joined Fox News’ prime time lineup in 2016. But Carlson said Tuesday he’s still unsure what the conspiracy theory is. "You’ve heard a lot about the great replacement theory recently, it’s everywhere … we’re still not sure exactly what it is,” the host said Tuesday."

Here is why Tucker is playing dumb about this whole great replacement theory....it is because, as of now, it is still widely unpopular to be in favor of it.....so you push the theory, and when called out - play dumb about it....in hopes it will become more popular in the future to where you can be more upfront about it -- or if it is defeated, you just pretend you were never in favor of it -- and come up with something else...pretty much how Conservatives did with the pro-segregation movement...when you are defeated, claim you were never for it and accuse the other side of doing it....

Example....Tucker claiming to not know what white replacement theory is and then claiming it was something created by Democrats.....so he is basically claiming Dems were so brilliant and powerful that they forced some white-nationalist French author guy (Renaud Camus) to come up with "great replacement theory" all the way back in the 1990's -- just to make Republicans look bad almost 30 years later?? Cool...so does that mean when that whole white nationalist march happened in Charlottesville -- and folks were going around yelling "Jews Will Not Replace Us" -- Democrats forced those guys to say that?? Cool...

Does that also mean that Dems even forced former Trump advisors Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller to be huge fans of the book "Camp Of The Saints" -- which basically laid the ground work for "white replacement theory" ?? In fact, when Steve Bannon wasn't talking about being upset that his daughter attends school with Jews; he said this about "immigration" -- not illegal immigration, but immigration in general....he said: “When we first started talking about this a year ago -- we called it the Camp of the Saints. … I mean, this is Camp of the Saints, isn’t it?”

Bannon, Adviser Behind Travel Ban, Is Fan of Novel About Feces-Eating Immigrants Destroying White Society

slate.com

What is Camp Of The Saints about? Why is Camp of the Saints believed to have laid the ground work for today's white replacement theory paranoia...well the book basically claims that "Dark-skinned immigrants are destroying white society" -- and talks about how they need to be slaughtered in order to stop them....sound familiar?? Sounds like that was exactly what the guy in Buffalo thought he was doing...again, like i asked earlier...why are Conservatives so ashamed to stand on the shit they have been pushing whenever a national spotlight gets shined on them?? When it happens, they scurry away like roaches...

There is no question that the left wants to replace whites with minorities

preferably blacks but in a pinch anyone off color will do