Why Is The New York Times Such A Left Wing Rag ?

[Sun Devil 92]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

 

[Indeependent]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

Self-hating atheist Jews.

 

[bluzman61]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

Probably because it's owned and run by liberal lunatics? That would be MY guess.

 

[Blackrook]

The Jews who own the New York Times refused to report on the Nazi's genocide of Jews in Europe because they feared that would weaken Americans' support for the war on the stupid assumption that your typical non-Jewish American hates Jews so much he would support their genocide.

 

[Blackrook]

So yes, the Jews who own the New York Times hate themselves and their fellow Jews.

 

[Blackrook]

The New York "I'm better than everyone from another part of the country" attitude infects the New York Times' attitude towards its readers, and that attitude infects many other publications based in New York.

 

[Blackrook]

My aunt had that New York attitude bad when I met her many years ago. She lived the fast-paced New York lifestyle, had an abortion, but one day it all crashed for her.

For the rest of her life, she's regretted that abortion. She never had any other children. She gave her aborted child a name and celebrated on its birthday.

Now, she's Christian and I hope she has achieved some happiness which was never possible while she thought she was superior becaue she lived in New York.

 

[odanny]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

I would venture a guess that your intellectual capacity is best suited for Alex Jones, not the New York Times. The Times, like the Washington Post, employ a staff of highly educated writers that are a pleasure to read.

Just not for people like you, who prefer emotional agit-prop that reinforces your hyper partisan and simplistic beliefs.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

I would venture a guess that your intellectual capacity is best suited for Alex Jones, not the New York Times. The Times, like the Washington Post, employ a staff of highly educated writers that are a pleasure to read.

Just not for people like you, who prefer emotional agit-prop that reinforces your hyper partisan and simplistic beliefs.

I am sure you pleasure yourself while reading them too.

Your posts reflect a lack of any kind of analytical capability.

Maybe you have a ring through your nose to which the Rag-of-Rags (the times) is connected.

 

[Blackrook]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

I would venture a guess that your intellectual capacity is best suited for Alex Jones, not the New York Times. The Times, like the Washington Post, employ a staff of highly educated writers that are a pleasure to read.

Just not for people like you, who prefer emotional agit-prop that reinforces your hyper partisan and simplistic beliefs.

Being highly educated does not make a good reporter.

In the old days, reporters were ordinary guys who worked their way up through the ranks starting with paper boy. They were not fancy boys with fancy degrees from fancy universities.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

John Stossel: Why I Hate The New York Times

Many people think dumb things because most every day The Times runs deceitful, biased stories and headlines that mislead.

reason.com

But mostly I read The Times because my neighbors read it, and I need to understand what they think.

Sadly, many think dumb things because most every day The Times runs deceitful, biased stories and headlines that mislead.

Opinion columns have license to do that, but these days, Times' smears extend to "news" stories.

A recent headline said that that President Trump's tweets had "united Britain in outrage." Wow. Really? The whole country?

Only if you read the entire story would you learn that the outraged people include "the opposition Labour party," "several" Conservatives and comedian John Cleese.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

New York Times, You're Full of Shit | The Shiny Butter Blog

2022 note/update/disclaimer sort of/whatever: I wrote this back when I thought Republicans were the source of all that was stupid and wrong. And back when I

shinybutter.com

This from a Trump Hater.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

And another article showing that the times is an elitist piece of shit.

6 Underreported Reasons Why The NY Times Totally Sucks

Not to sound like Trump, but there are actually several reasons to harbor a strong dislike for the 'NYT.'

www.cracked.com

 

[Indeependent]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

I would venture a guess that your intellectual capacity is best suited for Alex Jones, not the New York Times. The Times, like the Washington Post, employ a staff of highly educated writers that are a pleasure to read.

Just not for people like you, who prefer emotional agit-prop that reinforces your hyper partisan and simplistic beliefs.

So it's true...you're an idiot.

 

[SmokeALib]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

I would venture a guess that your intellectual capacity is best suited for Alex Jones, not the New York Times. The Times, like the Washington Post, employ a staff of highly educated writers that are a pleasure to read.

Just not for people like you, who prefer emotional agit-prop that reinforces your hyper partisan and simplistic beliefs.

Obvious sarcasm.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

If there was one motherfucker from New York who needs to get virus and die, it is Paul Krugman.

A perfect example of taking someone who knows something about ONE thing and letting him bullshit on MANY things.

Krugman Thoroughly Embarrasses Himself (Again), Excited About Drop In the Dow

www.redstate.com

 

[Bruce Daniels]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

Because the truth is left wing?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

Because the truth is left wing?

You bet.

Paul Krugman is full of truth.

 

[Bruce Daniels]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

Because the truth is left wing?

You bet.

Paul Krugman is full of truth.

OK, then.

 

[OnePercenter]

The times seem to be kind of a propaganda arm of for the left.

They write a lot of articles that are bullshit. Love how they attack others for being hacks....when they, themselves, are hacks.

The same reason faux is a right wing rag. $$$$$$$