Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And who have they arrested for it? Show us one Trump supporter arrested for using a "metal Pole". I'll wait.Democrats didn't storm the Capitol using deadly violence
Deadly violence? NOT ONE GUN was brought! All of the deadly violence was brought by the police against unarmed protesters!
- One unarmed girl, ex airforce vet was shot and killed by Capitol police.
- Three people died of stress induced heart attacks.
- One cop died the day after of unspecified causes.
Yep, beating police with long metal poles is violent and could be deadly. Launching metal poles into the ranks of the police is very violent and could be deadly.
Give them time, they're going to be found.
Give them time, fraud will be proven.
Ohhh Last time huh? What the fuck is that?
Still got nothing to show how YOU KNOW the election wasn't stolen. I get that. Ballless Boo.
No, and that was a painfully stupid attempt at a strawman. I want people with influence to stop spreading these idiotic lies about the election, because gullible dummies like you are prone to believe them and act on your impulses, when they do spread these lies.So what I hear you saying is, "I have no problem with tyranny. I just want to do it THIS way!!"
Hopefully that's clear enough for you.
No strawman, Fart. FYI, you might want to find out what that word means before you try to use it (of course, I could say that about most words you try to use). In actual fact, you just said it AGAIN. Only YOU would be mindless enough to say, "No, I don't want to silence people. I just want people to stop saying these things."
So yeah, it's clear now, just as it was clear before. You want to silence anyone who doesn't say what you want to hear, while pretending you're a person deserving of self-respect instead of a tyranny-loving shitstain who would make the world better by leaving it.
The more you try to dismiss and deflect the accusations against you, the more you prove they're true, because you're too ignorant to even lie well. So by all means, keep talking.
Wow!!!I can prove it now, and will soon in a separate dedicated thread.
Wow!!!I can prove it now, and will soon in a separate dedicated thread.
You can prove it in a thread on a message board!!!
Wow!!!
The burden is on the accuser.
Then send your steaming pile of horseshit to a lawyer.Anytime you're ready, I'm ready to go toe to toe with you fucker, line by line, item by item, over every bit of proof the election was stolen with DOCUMENTATION to support that in Structured Debate.
If you are not honest enough to admit there was massive fraud I think the conversation is over.So, no, you're not honest enough to admit that this is only an issue because Trump made it an issue.Trump was hardly the first one to say it. Phones were ringing off the hooks with citizens saying they witnessed the fraud. I have looked at the evidence and it is very convincing. Trump's policies are what mattered to me. But I have to admit he rose to the office in every important aspect.And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…amgreatness.com
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
If Trump had had the dignity to concede, this thread wouldn't exist.
Because it caused an insurrection. The election wasn't stolen. There is no evidence it was. Trump lost.Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
I posted a site with the evidence. You have done 0 research I would bet. You are a dime dozen useful idiot siding with what and who you think is popular. So we are done.If you are not honest enough to admit there was massive fraud I think the conversation is over.So, no, you're not honest enough to admit that this is only an issue because Trump made it an issue.Trump was hardly the first one to say it. Phones were ringing off the hooks with citizens saying they witnessed the fraud. I have looked at the evidence and it is very convincing. Trump's policies are what mattered to me. But I have to admit he rose to the office in every important aspect.And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
If Trump had had the dignity to concede, this thread wouldn't exist.
It was over before it began. You morons follow Trump around like hapless puppies. You believe any fucking thing he says, even when it's obvious to anyone breathing that he's lying through his teeth.
There are mountains of evidence. How stupid are you?Because it caused an insurrection. The election wasn't stolen. There is no evidence it was. Trump lost.Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
Trump set the standard on day one. He drew the line in the sand with his inauguration crowd lies. The cult goes on one side of the line, and everyone who doesn't want to be in the cult goes on the other. These goobers gleefully leapt across that line on day one and never looked back.If you are not honest enough to admit there was massive fraud I think the conversation is over.So, no, you're not honest enough to admit that this is only an issue because Trump made it an issue.Trump was hardly the first one to say it. Phones were ringing off the hooks with citizens saying they witnessed the fraud. I have looked at the evidence and it is very convincing. Trump's policies are what mattered to me. But I have to admit he rose to the office in every important aspect.And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
If Trump had had the dignity to concede, this thread wouldn't exist.
It was over before it began. You morons follow Trump around like hapless puppies. You believe any fucking thing he says, even when it's obvious to anyone breathing that he's lying through his teeth.
YEP. Trump and others have presented the evidence proving that the election was stolen and you have accused him and the evidence of being BASELESS, a CONSPIRACY THEORY and a LIE.
I posted a site with the evidence. You have done 0 research I would bet. You are a dime dozen useful idiot siding with what and who you think is popular. So we are done.If you are not honest enough to admit there was massive fraud I think the conversation is over.So, no, you're not honest enough to admit that this is only an issue because Trump made it an issue.Trump was hardly the first one to say it. Phones were ringing off the hooks with citizens saying they witnessed the fraud. I have looked at the evidence and it is very convincing. Trump's policies are what mattered to me. But I have to admit he rose to the office in every important aspect.And are you honest enough to admit it's solely because Trump said so? If he hadn't, we wouldn't be having this conversation.Maybe you should stay off the thread since no one is moving on with you. We will never accept that the election was free and fair.I have left that since it was time to move on and the questions have been answered by those on high..Maybe you should move on also or get a pink pussy hat...Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
If Trump had had the dignity to concede, this thread wouldn't exist.
It was over before it began. You morons follow Trump around like hapless puppies. You believe any fucking thing he says, even when it's obvious to anyone breathing that he's lying through his teeth.
You've already got election integrity. Coming up with all kinds of gibberish to claim it wasn't honest is what subverts our democracy.How is demanding election integrity “undermining” the election process?Because you're undermining the election process which is a cornerstone of our freedom.Good read, because it’s very true. It’s so odd that the left are obsessed with having us believe there was no shenanigans on election night or the days after. We already disagree on just about everything, so why do they care so much in what we believe?
Why Do the Election’s Defenders Require My Agreement?
Recently, I appeared as a guest on Andrew Sullivan’s podcast. Sullivan is vociferously anti-Trump, so I expected us to disagree—which, naturally, we did. But I was surprised by the extent to which he…
- Counting shutdowns in five states, in which one candidate was ahead, only to lose after the counting resumed;
- “Found” tranches of ballots going overwhelmingly—sometimes exclusively—to one candidate, the eventual “winner”;
- Sworn affidavits alleging the backdating of ballots;
- Historically low rejection rates—as in, orders of magnitude lower—of mail-in ballots, suggesting that many obviously invalid ballots were accepted as genuine;
- Mail-in and absentee ballots appearing without creases, raising the question of how they got into the envelopes required for their being mailed in;
- Thousands upon thousands of ballots all marked for one presidential candidate without a single choice marked for any down-ballot candidate.
- The absolute refusal to conduct signature audits—indeed, the discarding of many envelopes which alone make such audits possible—i.e., of the kind of recounts which are performed not merely to get the math right but to evaluate the validity of ballots;
Once again you Marxist fags accuse us of what you are doing. You cheat in elections and subvert our Republic by refusing to allow audits, or to pass voter ID laws.
What if a business refuses service to people who lack faith in Christianity?
What if a business refuses service to people who lack faith in Christianity?
Religion is a protected class.
Because it caused an insurrection. The election wasn't stolen. There is no evidence it was.Good read, because it’s very true.
The fact that the elections were certified. Oh and Trump’s Attorney General said so.Pick a couple the lies you were banned for.Great, Seawitch. Now back up your allegations with proof. Documentation. Where's your evidence supporting that all of these things are LIES?
DEFLECTION. There are no lies. I never said a word about being banned, idiot. The only lie here is that there was no massive fraud. PRESENT YOUR DOCUMENTATION that the election claims are all lies!
WHY IS THAT SO HARD TO GET ANYONE TO SHOW US?????
