Why is it to threat to Democracy to say 2020 was stolen, but not a threat to Democracy to say 2016 was stolen?

[DukeU]

What percentage of the country is homeless?

It's growing, not shrinking.

 

[Marener]

It's growing, not shrinking.

If the homeless population is growing, does that mean the economy is doing badly?

 

[Slyhunter]

The vast majority of people say their financial status is good or better.

But so are the bills which makes you have to make more to have less.

 

[FA_Q2]

You mean left.
Remember the time when a lot of their climate change temperature readings were on the backside of Air Conditioners.

Case in point

 

[JustAGuy1]

Many say 2000 and 2004, 2016, 2020 were all stolen. It’s all partisan BS.

This year will be no different.

 

[FA_Q2]

I never said the data disagrees with me. The point is that obviously there are data points that are contributing to people being less well off. You figure it out instead of letting the media tell you that it isn't happening.

You are the one letting the media tell you what to think, that is why you have no real data, ignore all the data that is given to you and cling to whatever bullshit you already believe. You didn't say the data was wrong, you just completely ignored it and reasserted your point without dealing with anything at all.

Because when the data disagrees with you, you assume it is wrong. You don't have to say it outright, running from every data point put up speaks volumes all on its own.

 

[Papageorgio]

Did he drop out because he never won a single primary? Is he off all the ballots?

Nope. Nope.

Didn’t bother any of you hacks before.

I never said it did. Libertarians dont have primaries, each party makes their own rules for selecting candidates, she is a decent candidate, don’t like the way both parties go negative, I want reasons to vote for someone, but neither party will go positive.

 

[SweetTea]

You are the one letting the media tell you what to think, that is why you have no real data, ignore all the data that is given to you and cling to whatever bullshit you already believe. You didn't say the data was wrong, you just completely ignored it and reasserted your point without dealing with anything at all.

Because when the data disagrees with you, you assume it is wrong. You don't have to say it outright, running from every data point put up speaks volumes all on its own.

The data is very much disputed. The problem is that somebody will post a left-wing spin from Axios and then I can respond with a right-wing spring from another source and the beat goes on and on.

The larger point is why do people in FACT have less money to spend than they did under Trump? Why are credit card debts rising? We can dispute data points all day, but trying to tell someone they have as much disposable income when in fact they don’t, is a hard sell. Aside from the growth in the markets, of which only 50% even have any money in at all, people are worse off. If it isn’t because of any of the data points we are discussing, then what is the reason? Is that Trump’s fault too?