Why is it important for a SCOTUS nominee to answer what is a woman?

[iamwhatiseem]

... because the transgender/woman issues are going to come to a head in this country, and it will likely end up in the SCOTUS.
So, in fact, this nominee refuses to provide an answer to an extremely easy question that she would have to reside on.
Her refusal to answer is, of course, an answer itself. She will side with the trangenders. And that is what she won't answer because she knows the overwhelming majority of Americans do not.
Al of of folks haven't seen the whole questions about what is a woman, she not only refused to answer that, but refused to answer if there is a difference between a male and a female.
Why is it that every single liberal SCOTUS nominee's most common answer is... not to answer? We have seen this played out every time.

 

[Esdraelon]

Her record is being hidden to the extent that they can do so. She's a loony radical and there is no way to stop her approval. Thankfully, the conservative members still have a one-vote margin. If John Roberts had actually been conservative, it would be a two-vote margin. IF the Rs can retake the Senate this November, Joe won't get the chance to push another insane Lefty onto SCOTUS.

 

[kyzr]

That's an easy question. This is a woman:

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Harvard must be a really bad school if their graduates can't even tell the difference between a man and a woman.

 

[rightwinger]

Why do Conservatives struggle so much with sexuality?

 

[bendog]

How can we be sure she'll use the right bathroom? This is UUUJUUUUge

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats have canceled the female gender. It no longer exists, even a SCOTUS nominee can no longer explain what a woman is.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Her record is being hidden to the extent that they can do so. She's a loony radical and there is no way to stop her approval. Thankfully, the conservative members still have a one-vote margin. If John Roberts had actually been conservative, it would be a two-vote margin. IF the Rs can retake the Senate this November, Joe won't get the chance to push another insane Lefty onto SCOTUS.

I don't know what SCOTUS you are talking about, but conservatives hold a 6-3 majority. Sotomayor, Kagan , and Breyer are the only liberals.

 

[martybegan]

Why do Conservatives struggle so much with sexuality?

You are the ones with the struggle, our side has the binary solution set.

 

[BluesLegend]

You are the ones with the struggle, our side has the binary solution set.

Dems are depraved godless heathens.

 

[rightwinger]

You are the ones with the struggle, our side has the binary solution set.

That is the problem
Sexuality is not Binary…never has been

 

[kyzr]

Why do Conservatives struggle so much with sexuality?

We don't struggle with sexuality. That must be those low-IQ democrats who are always confused.

 

[martybegan]

That is the problem
Sexuality is not Binary…never has been

sexuality is not sex/gender.

for some people sexuality is not even binary, it's single.

Go ask a lesbian if she wants to have sex with a "woman" that still has a penis.

 

[rightwinger]

sexuality is not sex/gender.

for some people sexuality is not even binary, it's single.

Go ask a lesbian if she wants to have sex with a "woman" that still has a penis.

Republicans have a lockstep view that if you have a penis you must act like a man, if not, you must act like a woman

They were adamant about it during the debate on gay rights and same sex marriage.

Sexuality is more complex than that and Republicans insist you define sexuality based on genitalia

 

[martybegan]

Republicans have a lockstep view that if you have a penis you must act like a man, if not, you must act like a woman

They were adamant about it during the debate on gay rights and same sex marriage.

Sexuality is more complex than that and Republicans insist you define sexuality based on genitalia

Actually the point we are trying to make is you are STILL a MAN, or are STILL a WOMAN, and telling us we have to treat you as you think as opposed to reality is the crux of the issue.

Again, ask an actual lesbian if she wants to fuck a "woman" who still has a penis.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually the point we are trying to make is you are STILL a MAN, or are STILL a WOMAN, and telling us we have to treat you as you think as opposed to reality is the crux of the issue.

Again, ask an actual lesbian if she wants to fuck a "woman" who still has a penis.

Actually, we want people to have the freedom to identify with the sex they feel most comfortable with
It is not always defined by genitalia

 

[kyzr]

Excuse me, I'm wanted back on planet EARTH.....

 

[miketx]

Why is it that every single liberal SCOTUS nominee's most common answer is... not to answer? We have seen this played out every time.

Because the commies are hell bent of destroying us.

 

[martybegan]

Actually, we want people to have the freedom to identify with the sex they feel most comfortable with
It is not always defined by genitalia

No, you want us to accept whatever the person says, regardless of how we feel about it, or the reality of the situation. Or how it screws over people like those college swimmers.

You refuse to answer the question, is a lesbian that refuses to have sex with a "woman" with a penis transphobic?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Why do Conservatives struggle so much with sexuality?

You have that backwards