Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
DUH! Suckassbil'sside is winning! Welcome, to M.R.ica.
You win, when you're dead, you king of fucktards.
the estimates for Antacrtica's ice extent and ice cap are all across the board. the GRACE measurements are based on assumptions and modelling so they wont be reliable until a reasonable length of time has passed to match reality.
anyone who says they know what is happening in either the Antarctic or the Arctic is just blowing smoke.
anyone who believes the dire predictions now has to ignore the failure of dire predictions throughout the history of mankind.
the estimates for Antacrtica's ice extent and ice cap are all across the board. the GRACE measurements are based on assumptions and modelling so they wont be reliable until a reasonable length of time has passed to match reality.
anyone who says they know what is happening in either the Antarctic or the Arctic is just blowing smoke.
anyone who believes the dire predictions now has to ignore the failure of dire predictions throughout the history of mankind.
OK, Crapforbrains, let's go over the post-politics reality, to see if any of it sinks in!
1. Temperature rise is ACCELERATING!
2. SLR will follow, from 2 mm, now past 3 mm per year, to a higher rate, of rise!
3. Arctic perennial ice and Greenland ice is melting, while the Arctic out-gasses shitloads!
4. West Antarctic ice is melting, at a rate of 100 cubic km, per year!
a. East Antarctica and Antarctic sea ice are holding steady, but that could change.
Let's call your brain a number 2, since you have crap, for brains. Specify your area of stupidity, since your ignorance is willful. I'll go over the threads and websites, for you, since you are too fucking stupid, to hit search OR to read thread posts.
DUH! Suckassbil'sside is winning! Welcome, to M.R.ica.
You win, when you're dead, you king of fucktards.
the estimates for Antacrtica's ice extent and ice cap are all across the board. the GRACE measurements are based on assumptions and modelling so they wont be reliable until a reasonable length of time has passed to match reality.
anyone who says they know what is happening in either the Antarctic or the Arctic is just blowing smoke.
anyone who believes the dire predictions now has to ignore the failure of dire predictions throughout the history of mankind.
OK, Crapforbrains, let's go over the post-politics reality, to see if any of it sinks in!
1. Temperature rise is ACCELERATING!
2. SLR will follow, from 2 mm, now past 3 mm per year, to a higher rate, of rise!
3. Arctic perennial ice and Greenland ice is melting, while the Arctic out-gasses shitloads!
4. West Antarctic ice is melting, at a rate of 100 cubic km, per year!
a. East Antarctica and Antarctic sea ice are holding steady, but that could change.
Let's call your brain a number 2, since you have crap, for brains. Specify your area of stupidity, since your ignorance is willful. I'll go over the threads and websites, for you, since you are too fucking stupid, to hit search OR to read thread posts.
#1 is clearly wrong, and there isn't a shred of credible evidence for numbers 2, 3 and 4
OK, Crapforbrains, let's go over the post-politics reality, to see if any of it sinks in!
1. Temperature rise is ACCELERATING!
2. SLR will follow, from 2 mm, now past 3 mm per year, to a higher rate, of rise!
3. Arctic perennial ice and Greenland ice is melting, while the Arctic out-gasses shitloads!
4. West Antarctic ice is melting, at a rate of 100 cubic km, per year!
a. East Antarctica and Antarctic sea ice are holding steady, but that could change.
Let's call your brain a number 2, since you have crap, for brains. Specify your area of stupidity, since your ignorance is willful. I'll go over the threads and websites, for you, since you are too fucking stupid, to hit search OR to read thread posts.
#1 is clearly wrong, and there isn't a shred of credible evidence for numbers 2, 3 and 4
Buttpunk, you are ignoring Trakar's graph, again, re 1. Remember when Professor Trakar posted the graph, of temperatures, 1950-present, which turns UP? Was this at the Hansen thread, and then you disappeared? What, you think I should post that same graph, every other day, since YOU SUCK?
Eat shit and die, buttpunk. Credible evidence, for 2, 3, and 4 is like the graphs, showing number 1 is happening is all over these threads AND all over the internet. You are too queer to pay attention, and your asshole is so full of dick, you can't remember shit.
Conservative zombies back in the bw days hobble off, for a constitutional:
Sucksassandballs on the hunt, for warmists:
Colorado seems to be on fire, sucksassandballs! Those Rocky Mountain high-zombies will catch on fire! Hose yourself down, before you stagger off, in the direction, of Waldo Canyon, eh?
Yeah, right, Wald0. In n0t the middle 0f n0where, d0 they teach special class, t0 use zer0, f0r o?
You sure are a queer bag of dogshit, sucksassandballs. I wouldn't pay, to piss on y0u!
I don't see science as being a political issue.
Good governance should be about acting on accurate scientific data - not about distorting the truth, hiding from it, or pretending the facts are not what they are.
While I think the use of nuclear vs renewables is a political issue around the world, only in the US (and to a lesser extent, Australia) does climate change seem to be political.
The Conservative parties of the UK, France, Germany, Finland, Denmark, New Zealand and host of others ALL accept that human acitivty may be playing a role in climate change, and have developed policies to suit.
In many cases, this means nuclear.
But why do some Americans seem to think climate change is left wing conspiracy, when most conservatives around the world are saying the opposite?
It will take a series of really major catastrophes before the willfully ignorant will see reality. And then they will blame the scientists for not telling them that this was coming. In spite of a half century of scientists doing exactly that.
OK, Crapforbrains, let's go over the post-politics reality, to see if any of it sinks in!
1. Temperature rise is ACCELERATING!
2. SLR will follow, from 2 mm, now past 3 mm per year, to a higher rate, of rise!
3. Arctic perennial ice and Greenland ice is melting, while the Arctic out-gasses shitloads!
4. West Antarctic ice is melting, at a rate of 100 cubic km, per year!
a. East Antarctica and Antarctic sea ice are holding steady, but that could change.
Let's call your brain a number 2, since you have crap, for brains. Specify your area of stupidity, since your ignorance is willful. I'll go over the threads and websites, for you, since you are too fucking stupid, to hit search OR to read thread posts.
#1 is clearly wrong, and there isn't a shred of credible evidence for numbers 2, 3 and 4
Buttpunk, you are ignoring Trakar's graph, again, re 1. Remember when Professor Trakar posted the graph, of temperatures, 1950-present, which turns UP? Was this at the Hansen thread, and then you disappeared? What, you think I should post that same graph, every other day, since YOU SUCK?
Eat shit and die, buttpunk. Credible evidence, for 2, 3, and 4 is like the graphs, showing number 1 is happening is all over these threads AND all over the internet. You are too queer to pay attention, and your asshole is so full of dick, you can't remember shit.
I don't see science as being a political issue.
Good governance should be about acting on accurate scientific data - not about distorting the truth, hiding from it, or pretending the facts are not what they are.
While I think the use of nuclear vs renewables is a political issue around the world, only in the US (and to a lesser extent, Australia) does climate change seem to be political.
The Conservative parties of the UK, France, Germany, Finland, Denmark, New Zealand and host of others ALL accept that human acitivty may be playing a role in climate change, and have developed policies to suit.
In many cases, this means nuclear.
But why do some Americans seem to think climate change is left wing conspiracy, when most conservatives around the world are saying the opposite?
All issues on which people are polarized can be exploited by politicians. Some scientific projects are costly, in terms of tax money. That money is controlled by politicians.
Ludwik Kowalski
"Why is climate science political?"
Shit happens.