Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

[Papageorgio]

Yep, he has no character so you gave in to his prick and thought it was better to get sucked off than to remain faithful to his wife.

Whatever, dude.

You are the classic definition of a puritan. Someone who lives in mortal fear other people might be enjoying themselves.

I didn't care what he did, but for you to be stupid that he was thinking of his family is utter bullshit. Only a complete moron or a partisan idiot would think that.

 

[Papageorgio]

Joe,

why is having an adulterous affair 'consensual sex' and 'none of the public's business' .... when a Democrat is involved; yet, it is enough to demonize and drive a man from office or running for office when it involves (without proof) a Republican?

When Slick Willey was caught having an adulterous affair...and lying his ass off about it...Liberals argued, as you did, that it was 'consensual', 'none of the public's business', and that neither it nor the lies he told about it to the world / American people diminished his ability to be President (except for that lack of morals, ethics, him proving he can lie his ass off like a pro without blinking, etc...)

When Herman Cain was running for President the Left launched another despicable 'politics of personal destruction' campaign against him - they had women coming out of the woodwork accusing him of sexual 'misconduct'. Suddenly the same exact behavior DID matter and was grounds for him being eliminated as a candidate. (After he and his wife agreed they didn't want to put up with the despicable BS and he pulled out suddenly those women disappeared and the media suddenly treated his name like 'Lord Voldemort' in the Harry Potter series - his name was never mentioned again.

So why is it, exactly, that having affairs, sexually harassing, raping women, sending pictures of your Weiner to women...these are almost 'badges of honor' in all but the most extreme circumstances (it seems) for Liberals, who get a pass for such deplorable deviant behavior, but they demand that not be the same case for Republicans (with whom they have proven, if they can't find such behavior they simply make it up)?

Lil' Teddy Kennedy left a woman to die at the bottom of a water-filled ditch, running back home - abandoning her to die, just to protect the Kennedy name and his personal political future....no big deal. After all, he was a Kennedy and a Democrat.

Slick Willey: Pathological liar, career sexual deviant who sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, raped, and engaged in adulterous affairs his entire life....with his 'loving, devoted' wife right beside him 'sicking' private investigators on his female victims while she bullied, intimidated, and threatened them into silence to protect the Clinton 'Empire' and HER chance to be President...

John 'The Breck Girl' Edwards was cheating on his wife as she fought cancer...yeah, there's a real winner, huh ladies?!

Al Gore couldn't keep it in his pants around other women, either, and he and Tipper were divorced due to his infidelity (w/Laurie David).

Anthony Weiner just couldn't keep it in his pants - he couldn't keep it off the INTERNET!

Democrats want to be rock starts in the public eye, going for the highest most visible positions they can get then squeal about how their sexual deviancy and 'mis-steps' are no one else's business....but like jackals, they go after any Republican engaging gin the same activity (which I actually have no problem with - just judge 'em all the same').

It's just the double-standards and hypocrisy the Liberals engage in that is pathetic. Glass Houses and throwing stones, you know....and most Liberals don't have 1 window in their 'house' NOT broken.....

Nicely written.

 

[rdean]

How many women did Bill Clinton drug and rape?

 

[Papageorgio]

Were you not paying attention during that time? The women were slammed, smeared, accused of lying, etc and she was involved in the whole thing. Note that Hillary gave a blanket assurance to all women that they had a right to be heard and believed if they were sexually assaulted. Her actions, of course, and your reactions now, give the lie to that stance. What she (and you) REALLY mean is all women who claim rape are to be believed as long as they don't oppose her.

Or unless they are lying their asses off. Here's the problem, not a ONE of these women could have convicted Clinton of rape on the evidence they had. (Actually, what Willey and Jones alleged didn't get anywhere near 'rape'. So we are only talking about Brodderick, really.)

no prosecutor would prosecute a rape where the "victim" couldn't remember the day it happened, had sworn out an affadavit saying it didn't happen, and whose only corroborating witnesses have an ax to grind with the accused because he pardoned the man who killed their father.

That's not Hillary's stance. She says they have the right to be heard and believed. Her actions then, and your reaction now, give the lie to that stance.

They only have a right to be heard if it doesn't reflect poorly on her husband. If it reflects poorly , then the bitches, sluts and whores need to STFU.

 

[Papageorgio]

How many women did Bill Clinton drug and rape?

Go back and find it, it's in this thread.

 

[Papageorgio]

Clinton was a womanizer who used his power to to get sex. Not much to admire about a man who used women for his own selfish gains.

Except the women were throwing themselves at him because he had power and fame. Here's the thing, guy. Whether you are talking about rock stars, movie stars, wealthy guys or politicians, women throw themselves at that. Probably because it's hard wired to want to mate to get the most advantagous genes.

Clinton is a bad guy because he gave in to women who were crawling over each other to get at him? I don't think so.

No, he's a bad guy because he lied, perverted the justice system to prevent a woman from having her day in court, and tried to destroy the women who dared to accuse him of sexual improprieties.

The thing with the powerful and famous, they often begin to believe that they're irresistible and end up doing exactly what Bubba did, force themselves where they're not wanted.

He tried to deny Paula Jones her Civil Rights. Civil rights are for liberals.

 

[JoeB131]

Joe,

why is having an adulterous affair 'consensual sex' and 'none of the public's business' .... when a Democrat is involved; yet, it is enough to demonize and drive a man from office or running for office when it involves (without proof) a Republican?

And how many Republicans was that done to? David Vitter remained in office long after it was found out he had been hiring prostitutes. Elliot Spitzer had to resign.


The point is, you made a long list of Democrats who "got away with it", (Spitzer, Weiner and Edwards really didn't) but the only Republican you can cite in your diatribe is Herman Cain. The only reason why anyone paid attention to Cain was because for a weak, he was leading Mormon Mitt in the polls... so I have to wonder who actually did him in there.

 

[JoeB131]

No, he's a bad guy because he lied, perverted the justice system to prevent a woman from having her day in court, and tried to destroy the women who dared to accuse him of sexual improprieties.

The thing with the powerful and famous, they often begin to believe that they're irresistible and end up doing exactly what Bubba did, force themselves where they're not wanted.

So how was it Ken Starr spent 70 million dollars and couldn't prove any of that?

 

[JoeB131]

Nicely written.

Yes, other than all the facts he avoided, like David Vitter getting a pass and Eliot Spitzer having to resign.

 

[my2¢]

What Bill Clinton has got going for him is his two successors.

 

[Papageorgio]

Nicely written.

Yes, other than all the facts he avoided, like David Vitter getting a pass and Eliot Spitzer having to resign.

Other than the fact you don't like the facts.

 

[JoeB131]

He tried to deny Paula Jones her Civil Rights. Civil rights are for liberals.

Let's get realistic here, guy. Paula Jones asked initially for $250,000 and eventually got $850,000 after her partisan attorneys kept upping the stakes every time Clinton's insurance company tried to settle because it was cheaper than litigating.

And this great offense she suffered? She (supposedly) saw Clinton's dick. Of course, she had two kids, two husbands, numerous boyfriends, it is safe to say she knows what a dick looks like and seeing one was NOT a horrifying experience for her.


What's the Going Rate for Sexual Harassment Settlements?

Many litigants reach a confidential settlement before completing a trial, so tabulating statistics about sexual harassment claims is very difficult. One study looked at 50 sexual harassment settlements (PDF) in cases before Chicago magistrate judges, and found that amounts average around $53,000, with a median of about $30,000.

 

[JoeB131]

Other than the fact you don't like the facts.

I like facts just fine. This was never about the facts. This was about using the civil litigation system to bog down a president in nuscience litigation, not about poor Paula having to see a dick before she took off her clothes for Penthouse.

 

[Papageorgio]

He tried to deny Paula Jones her Civil Rights. Civil rights are for liberals.

Let's get realistic here, guy. Paula Jones asked initially for $250,000 and eventually got $850,000 after her partisan attorneys kept upping the stakes every time Clinton's insurance company tried to settle because it was cheaper than litigating.

And this great offense she suffered? She (supposedly) saw Clinton's dick. Of course, she had two kids, two husbands, numerous boyfriends, it is safe to say she knows what a dick looks like and seeing one was NOT a horrifying experience for her.


What's the Going Rate for Sexual Harassment Settlements?

Many litigants reach a confidential settlement before completing a trial, so tabulating statistics about sexual harassment claims is very difficult. One study looked at 50 sexual harassment settlements (PDF) in cases before Chicago magistrate judges, and found that amounts average around $53,000, with a median of about $30,000.

Look a democratic chauvinist pig. I knew they were out there.

 

[Conservative65]

Other than the fact you don't like the facts.

I like facts just fine. This was never about the facts. This was about using the civil litigation system to bog down a president in nuscience litigation, not about poor Paula having to see a dick before she took off her clothes for Penthouse.

It was about obstruction of justice and lying under oath. Last time I looked, those were crimes.

The only fact your interested in is that Clinton is a Liberal piece of shit and he could do anything he wants and you'd suck his dick, perhaps literally. You've got the figurative part covered based on how you cover for his actions.

 

[JoeB131]

Look a democratic chauvinist pig. I knew they were out there.

Guy, like I've said, I'm a Republican who is just hoping for the day we take the party back from the Religious Crazies and the Plutocrats.

But it is duly noted that you really couldn't answer the point, that the charges against Clinton were politically motivated and not about getting justice for Paula Penthouse Jones.

I love making you squeal like a little *****.

 

[JoeB131]

It was about obstruction of justice and lying under oath. Last time I looked, those were crimes.

The only fact your interested in is that Clinton is a Liberal piece of shit and he could do anything he wants and you'd suck his dick, perhaps literally. You've got the figurative part covered based on how you cover for his actions.

Oh, please, guy, you are trying to use a technicality to make a big deal over nothing.

Didn't vote for Clinton either time he was up. But the fact was, whatever occurred between him and Lewinsky had nothing to do with whether or not Paula Jones was irreparably damaged by seeing Clinton's dick.

In the interest of total fairness, I thought that Anita Hill was full of shit, too, and still do.

 

[Papageorgio]

Other than the fact you don't like the facts.

I like facts just fine. This was never about the facts. This was about using the civil litigation system to bog down a president in nuscience litigation, not about poor Paula having to see a dick before she took off her clothes for Penthouse.

Fact is, the President tried to deny Paula Jones her civil rights. Clinton also tried to obstruct justice and he perjured himself. No matter me forced him to do anything. They were all his choices and he was wrong. You keep repeating the same stuff over and over.

The fact is whether it should have happened or not, it did happen and he handled it wrong.

 

[Conservative65]

It was about obstruction of justice and lying under oath. Last time I looked, those were crimes.

The only fact your interested in is that Clinton is a Liberal piece of shit and he could do anything he wants and you'd suck his dick, perhaps literally. You've got the figurative part covered based on how you cover for his actions.

Oh, please, guy, you are trying to use a technicality to make a big deal over nothing.

Didn't vote for Clinton either time he was up. But the fact was, whatever occurred between him and Lewinsky had nothing to do with whether or not Paula Jones was irreparably damaged by seeing Clinton's dick.

In the interest of total fairness, I thought that Anita Hill was full of shit, too, and still do.

Try obstructing justice and lying under oath then tell me it's just a technicality. Interesting how your kind consider breaking the law as no big deal. In the end, it is and the specifics under which it occurs are irrelevant. You are justifying criminal activity.

You can't compare the two things. Your attempt to do so is a failure much like your working career and inability to stay in a job more than 6 months at a time.

How is that new position at the drive thru window as compared to dropping fries?

 

[Papageorgio]

Look a democratic chauvinist pig. I knew they were out there.

Guy, like I've said, I'm a Republican who is just hoping for the day we take the party back from the Religious Crazies and the Plutocrats.

But it is duly noted that you really couldn't answer the point, that the charges against Clinton were politically motivated and not about getting justice for Paula Penthouse Jones.

I love making you squeal like a little *****.

I'm not squealing, you are a chauvinist pig. Nice try spinning.