Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

The right thing according to who, you? You think a lie has degrees. Shows you have no character.

Of course lies have degrees.

Saying "No" when your signifigant other asks if that dress makes her look fat is probably a lie, but it's not a harmful lie.

Saying "Saddam has WMD's" which results in a war that kills 5000 Americans and 1,000,000 Iraqis, costs a trillion dollars, has a lot more degrees than that.

So if "That Dress doesn't make you look fat' is a 1 and "Saddam is going to kill us all" is a 10 on the Lie Scale----

"I never had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky" rates maybe a 2. No one died. No one lost their fortune. No one lost their job.


It's still a lie and there is no scale. If you'll lie about cheating on your spouse, you'll lie about anything. Only Liberals justify lying.
 
If you have more, prove it. Once again, you make a claim you know you can't prove and will make some excuse as to why I should believe you. When you can prove your claim, do so. Since you aren't man enough to do so, I'll call it a win.

Yeah, clearly, that's the ticket. Tell a psycho on the internet where I really live.

You aren't very smart, are you, Cleetus.


I'm smart enough to know you didn't prove your claim and can't. I'm also smart enough to recognize a ***** like you when I see him. Intelligence is something that can be measure in degrees and you're below zero.
 
It's still a lie and there is no scale. If you'll lie about cheating on your spouse, you'll lie about anything. Only Liberals justify lying.

So you are telling me you never lie about anything, including lies of ommission? Come on, that sounds like a lie to me.

I'm smart enough to know you didn't prove your claim and can't. I'm also smart enough to recognize a ***** like you when I see him. Intelligence is something that can be measure in degrees and you're below zero.

Yet I dance circles around you and expose you for the racist piece of shit that you are.

Every time.
 
Right, because sexual harassment means nothing in Hillary's, and your, world.

I can't speak for Hillary's world, but i can speak for my world where I constantly self-edit every day because I don't know who is going to take offense to what.

You see, even if you believe EVERYTHING Paula Jones said was true, it really doesn't qualify as sexual harrassment.

Clinton was not her direct supervisor.

She did not have daily contact with him (thereby not creating a "hostile work environment".

There was no evidence any retaliatory action was taken against her. (In fact, the best she could come up with was that she was moved to an area because her work habits were so sloppy she kept other people from getting their work done.)

At the time she filed her suit, you had to show that there was a detrimental effect to you, not just th at you saw something that offended you.

(Since her suit, Ellsworth vs. Burlington expanded that, but it isn't entirely clear that applied here.)

This is why Susan Weber Wright dismissed the case.

It had no LEGAL merit.

Now, IF Clinton did what she said he did, does that make him kind of a creep? Yeah. So what?

Creep or not, when he was president, we had good jobs, peace, prosperity and frankly, an era of no worries if this was the worst thing we had to worry about.
And justice be damned. Everything Hillary is saying today completely belies your argument. Today she is saying that women have the right to be heard and believed, yet she was instrumental in silencing women who tried to be heard and believed. That is a problem for her.
 
So are all regressives rapists ? Because they seem to accuse All white men of it except thier rapey leaders.

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
It's still a lie and there is no scale. If you'll lie about cheating on your spouse, you'll lie about anything. Only Liberals justify lying.

So you are telling me you never lie about anything, including lies of ommission? Come on, that sounds like a lie to me.

I'm smart enough to know you didn't prove your claim and can't. I'm also smart enough to recognize a ***** like you when I see him. Intelligence is something that can be measure in degrees and you're below zero.

Yet I dance circles around you and expose you for the racist piece of shit that you are.

Every time.

A jew hater calling others racist. That's priceless.
 
And justice be damned. Everything Hillary is saying today completely belies your argument. Today she is saying that women have the right to be heard and believed, yet she was instrumental in silencing women who tried to be heard and believed. That is a problem for her.

I think you are confusing "Right to be heard" with "Right to be believed even though they spent 70 million dollars investigating your claims and even the nasty old prude who looked into it didn't believe your shit!"

The thing was, those women were silenced because they were FOUND TO BE LIARS!!!!

Now they are popping back up again, hoping everyone will forget they were proven to be liars 20 years ago.
 
Bill Clinton is NOT beloved.

Sorry to break it out to you all.
 
And justice be damned. Everything Hillary is saying today completely belies your argument. Today she is saying that women have the right to be heard and believed, yet she was instrumental in silencing women who tried to be heard and believed. That is a problem for her.

I think you are confusing "Right to be heard" with "Right to be believed even though they spent 70 million dollars investigating your claims and even the nasty old prude who looked into it didn't believe your shit!"

The thing was, those women were silenced because they were FOUND TO BE LIARS!!!!

Now they are popping back up again, hoping everyone will forget they were proven to be liars 20 years ago.
I can only go by what she said, not by your spin attempt after the fact. How else to interpret what she said, given that her statement was definitive and she has offered no alternative explanation? The bottom line remains, moreover, that she deliberately set herself up as a champion for women's rights with this in her past, and the longer she refuses to address that, this is going to keep dogging her. It is much like Ted Kennedy running for the head of MADD.
 
15th post
I can only go by what she said, not by your spin attempt after the fact. How else to interpret what she said, given that her statement was definitive and she has offered no alternative explanation? The bottom line remains, moreover, that she deliberately set herself up as a champion for women's rights with this in her past, and the longer she refuses to address that, this is going to keep dogging her. It is much like Ted Kennedy running for the head of MADD.

Hillary has been fighting for women's rights for the last 40 years, guy. We can thank the Clintons for women being able to get time off for their pregnancies without losing their jobs, for being able to choose to end their pregnancies if they want to, for local law enforcement treating domestic violence as a real crime.

Bringing up your fake whores you found dragging a $100.00 through a trailer park doesn't change that.

Now, here's the thing. If I were tasked with beating Hillary, I wouldn't be dredging up this bullshit again. It made people feel sorry for Bill when you did it 20 years ago, people will feel MORE sorry for her.

I'd actually talk about the stuff she is proposing, like free college we don't have money for when the economy can't find jobs for all the college grads we have now.
 
You are intolerant of ideas that disagree with your perception of life. You are a bigot in the class of shootspeeders and Mathew.

Well, when your "ideas" involve a book with talking animals in it and treating that like it's actual history, then, yes, I prefer things like "proof" and "evidence'.

When you tell me you have the right to slaughter people on your holy land because your book with the talking animals said so, and dammit, you expect me to pay for it, then I have a special level of contempt for you.
 
You are intolerant of ideas that disagree with your perception of life. You are a bigot in the class of shootspeeders and Mathew.

Well, when your "ideas" involve a book with talking animals in it and treating that like it's actual history, then, yes, I prefer things like "proof" and "evidence'.

When you tell me you have the right to slaughter people on your holy land because your book with the talking animals said so, and dammit, you expect me to pay for it, then I have a special level of contempt for you.

I have contempt to for dishonest people such as yourself. Big deal, bigot.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom