Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

[Papageorgio]

[...
The White House isn't an HR Department. And since she was an unpaid intern....

Actually, at the time of the affair, she wasn't an intern.

She was a paid employee. Who really, really, really wanted to **** Bill.

What either wanted was irrelevant, in a working atmosphere Bill being the President, being in a position of power, being married, having character, he should have turned Lewinsky away, and should have moved her to another department.

However, when you are selfish and think only of yourself and your own pleasure, you make bad choices.

It is interesting that we were told that it is impossible for a man to have a truly consensual relationship with woman in the office if there was a power differential between them, right up until Bubba hit the scene. Then, all of a sudden, it's just perfectly fine. I bet there were a lot of secretaries cussing Bubba and Monica around that time.

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

 

[hadit]

[...
The White House isn't an HR Department. And since she was an unpaid intern....

Actually, at the time of the affair, she wasn't an intern.

She was a paid employee. Who really, really, really wanted to **** Bill.

What either wanted was irrelevant, in a working atmosphere Bill being the President, being in a position of power, being married, having character, he should have turned Lewinsky away, and should have moved her to another department.

However, when you are selfish and think only of yourself and your own pleasure, you make bad choices.

It is interesting that we were told that it is impossible for a man to have a truly consensual relationship with woman in the office if there was a power differential between them, right up until Bubba hit the scene. Then, all of a sudden, it's just perfectly fine. I bet there were a lot of secretaries cussing Bubba and Monica around that time.

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

That's what is so infuriating about Hillary stomping around, claiming to be a champion for women, and other feel-good stuff. She's a champion for women who don't endanger her chances for the White House is what she is.

 

[Papageorgio]

[...
The White House isn't an HR Department. And since she was an unpaid intern....

Actually, at the time of the affair, she wasn't an intern.

She was a paid employee. Who really, really, really wanted to **** Bill.

What either wanted was irrelevant, in a working atmosphere Bill being the President, being in a position of power, being married, having character, he should have turned Lewinsky away, and should have moved her to another department.

However, when you are selfish and think only of yourself and your own pleasure, you make bad choices.

It is interesting that we were told that it is impossible for a man to have a truly consensual relationship with woman in the office if there was a power differential between them, right up until Bubba hit the scene. Then, all of a sudden, it's just perfectly fine. I bet there were a lot of secretaries cussing Bubba and Monica around that time.

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

That's what is so infuriating about Hillary stomping around, claiming to be a champion for women, and other feel-good stuff. She's a champion for women who don't endanger her chances for the White House is what she is.

The Clintons look out for the Clintons, that's it and Trump exposes the hypocrisy of those two.

 

[hadit]

Actually, at the time of the affair, she wasn't an intern.

She was a paid employee. Who really, really, really wanted to **** Bill.

What either wanted was irrelevant, in a working atmosphere Bill being the President, being in a position of power, being married, having character, he should have turned Lewinsky away, and should have moved her to another department.

However, when you are selfish and think only of yourself and your own pleasure, you make bad choices.

It is interesting that we were told that it is impossible for a man to have a truly consensual relationship with woman in the office if there was a power differential between them, right up until Bubba hit the scene. Then, all of a sudden, it's just perfectly fine. I bet there were a lot of secretaries cussing Bubba and Monica around that time.

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

That's what is so infuriating about Hillary stomping around, claiming to be a champion for women, and other feel-good stuff. She's a champion for women who don't endanger her chances for the White House is what she is.

The Clintons look out for the Clintons, that's it and Trump exposes the hypocrisy of those two.

There's a lot of ammunition for someone to use who isn't afraid to get some negative headlines in the NYT.

 

[Jroc]

What argument are you speaking of? You said Clinton was protecting his family and I said he wasn't. Pretty obvious he wasn't. So there is no argument.

As I said, guy, you seem to not know much about humans, for someone in human resources.

I do understand, I also understand what Clinton did was purely selfish at the time he did it. If someone was truly thinking of himself, he wouldn't try to screw everyone he came in contact with. Many people cheat and many people don't. Cheating on a marriage mate is a selfish act. Just the way it is.

Who gives a shit about Bill Clinton cheating on that hag....Previous rapes, and sex in the oval office with the 20 year old intern says all you need to know about the scum.

 

[JoeB131]

The list of women that stepped forward and publicly complained about the former President are:

GUy, you can keep repeating this same tired-ass list. But a lot of them are unsubstantiated.

For instance, Gracen has said publicly her relationship with Clinton was consensual. SO did Lewinisky. ANd when you throw in '22 year old Yale", that's just a lot of horseshit.

SO essentially, the only three who've gone on record in their own words are all questionable. The rest are just shit you guys make up.

This shit didn't fly with people 20 years ago, why do you think it's going to fly now when Bill isn't even on the ballot.

 

[JoeB131]

Who gives a shit about Bill Clinton cheating on that hag....Previous rapes, and sex in the oval office with the 20 year old intern says all you need to know about the scum.

All I need to know.

When he was president, we had 25 million new jobs, 4% unemployment, budget surpluses, peace, prosperity, technical innovation.

If the worst thing we had to worry about is if two total strangers are having oral sex or not, then frankly, life is actually pretty good.

Bush lied us into a war over weapons that didn't exist. 5000 Americans died. I htink that's a little worse than getting a Beej in the White House, don't you?

 

[JoeB131]

Were you not paying attention during that time? The women were slammed, smeared, accused of lying, etc and she was involved in the whole thing. Note that Hillary gave a blanket assurance to all women that they had a right to be heard and believed if they were sexually assaulted. Her actions, of course, and your reactions now, give the lie to that stance. What she (and you) REALLY mean is all women who claim rape are to be believed as long as they don't oppose her.

Or unless they are lying their asses off. Here's the problem, not a ONE of these women could have convicted Clinton of rape on the evidence they had. (Actually, what Willey and Jones alleged didn't get anywhere near 'rape'. So we are only talking about Brodderick, really.)

no prosecutor would prosecute a rape where the "victim" couldn't remember the day it happened, had sworn out an affadavit saying it didn't happen, and whose only corroborating witnesses have an ax to grind with the accused because he pardoned the man who killed their father.

 

[JoeB131]

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

Funny, the way most people remember it was that Ken Starr looked a little creepy persecuting htis woman and her family to get her to talk about her sex life.

That's what is so infuriating about Hillary stomping around, claiming to be a champion for women, and other feel-good stuff. She's a champion for women who don't endanger her chances for the White House is what she is.

Or most women would realize Clinton was the guy who got them-

The Violence against women act.
Protected Roe v. Wade
The Family and Medical Leave Act

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

If they can bring up charges from something that happened years ago. People shouldn't be cheering something like this. it could be YOU NEXT THEY DO it do.

and you're right. why isn't Billy Hounddog Clinton being brought up on the charges that were brought against him by a bunch of women?

With the Clinton's it's always been about money and power. As long as you have that, you can convince others of any story you like.

 

[Papageorgio]

Yep, it is wrong and demeaning to women. Look at the heat Lewinsky took for the affair. She was a slut and he was just a guy doing what guys do. Talk about a war on women and stereotyping.

Funny, the way most people remember it was that Ken Starr looked a little creepy persecuting htis woman and her family to get her to talk about her sex life.

That's what is so infuriating about Hillary stomping around, claiming to be a champion for women, and other feel-good stuff. She's a champion for women who don't endanger her chances for the White House is what she is.

Or most women would realize Clinton was the guy who got them-

The Violence against women act.
Protected Roe v. Wade
The Family and Medical Leave Act

Clinton was a womanizer who used his power to to get sex. Not much to admire about a man who used women for his own selfish gains.

 

[JoeB131]

Clinton was a womanizer who used his power to to get sex. Not much to admire about a man who used women for his own selfish gains.

Except the women were throwing themselves at him because he had power and fame. Here's the thing, guy. Whether you are talking about rock stars, movie stars, wealthy guys or politicians, women throw themselves at that. Probably because it's hard wired to want to mate to get the most advantagous genes.

Clinton is a bad guy because he gave in to women who were crawling over each other to get at him? I don't think so.

 

[Papageorgio]

Clinton was a womanizer who used his power to to get sex. Not much to admire about a man who used women for his own selfish gains.

Except the women were throwing themselves at him because he had power and fame. Here's the thing, guy. Whether you are talking about rock stars, movie stars, wealthy guys or politicians, women throw themselves at that. Probably because it's hard wired to want to mate to get the most advantagous genes.

Clinton is a bad guy because he gave in to women who were crawling over each other to get at him? I don't think so.

Yep, he has no character so you gave in to his prick and thought it was better to get sucked off than to remain faithful to his wife.

 

[JoeB131]

Yep, he has no character so you gave in to his prick and thought it was better to get sucked off than to remain faithful to his wife.

Whatever, dude.

You are the classic definition of a puritan. Someone who lives in mortal fear other people might be enjoying themselves.

 

[easyt65]

Libs scream Slick Willey us not a criminal perv cause he's never been found guilty of anything....so why do they / the OP say Cosby is 'finished' / guilty when he hasn't been found guilty (yet) either?

Just find the hypocrisy / double standards amusing....

 

[JoeB131]

Libs scream Slick Willey us not a criminal perv cause he's never been found guilty of anything....so why do they / the OP say Cosby is 'finished' / guilty when he hasn't been found guilty (yet) either?

Just find the hypocrisy / double standards amusing....

Mostly because the Clinton stuff was litigated 20 years ago, when Pervert Ken Starr spent 70 million tax dollars sniffing panties, and all he could come up with was that Lewinsky had consensual sex with him.

MEANWHILE, Cosby has yet to go on trial. Oh, yeah, and he's admitted in court to drugging women.

 

[easyt65]

Joe,

why is having an adulterous affair 'consensual sex' and 'none of the public's business' .... when a Democrat is involved; yet, it is enough to demonize and drive a man from office or running for office when it involves (without proof) a Republican?

When Slick Willey was caught having an adulterous affair...and lying his ass off about it...Liberals argued, as you did, that it was 'consensual', 'none of the public's business', and that neither it nor the lies he told about it to the world / American people diminished his ability to be President (except for that lack of morals, ethics, him proving he can lie his ass off like a pro without blinking, etc...)

When Herman Cain was running for President the Left launched another despicable 'politics of personal destruction' campaign against him - they had women coming out of the woodwork accusing him of sexual 'misconduct'. Suddenly the same exact behavior DID matter and was grounds for him being eliminated as a candidate. (After he and his wife agreed they didn't want to put up with the despicable BS and he pulled out suddenly those women disappeared and the media suddenly treated his name like 'Lord Voldemort' in the Harry Potter series - his name was never mentioned again.

So why is it, exactly, that having affairs, sexually harassing, raping women, sending pictures of your Weiner to women...these are almost 'badges of honor' in all but the most extreme circumstances (it seems) for Liberals, who get a pass for such deplorable deviant behavior, but they demand that not be the same case for Republicans (with whom they have proven, if they can't find such behavior they simply make it up)?

Lil' Teddy Kennedy left a woman to die at the bottom of a water-filled ditch, running back home - abandoning her to die, just to protect the Kennedy name and his personal political future....no big deal. After all, he was a Kennedy and a Democrat.

Slick Willey: Pathological liar, career sexual deviant who sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, raped, and engaged in adulterous affairs his entire life....with his 'loving, devoted' wife right beside him 'sicking' private investigators on his female victims while she bullied, intimidated, and threatened them into silence to protect the Clinton 'Empire' and HER chance to be President...

John 'The Breck Girl' Edwards was cheating on his wife as she fought cancer...yeah, there's a real winner, huh ladies?!

Al Gore couldn't keep it in his pants around other women, either, and he and Tipper were divorced due to his infidelity (w/Laurie David).

Anthony Weiner just couldn't keep it in his pants - he couldn't keep it off the INTERNET!

Democrats want to be rock starts in the public eye, going for the highest most visible positions they can get then squeal about how their sexual deviancy and 'mis-steps' are no one else's business....but like jackals, they go after any Republican engaging gin the same activity (which I actually have no problem with - just judge 'em all the same').

It's just the double-standards and hypocrisy the Liberals engage in that is pathetic. Glass Houses and throwing stones, you know....and most Liberals don't have 1 window in their 'house' NOT broken.....

 

[hadit]

Were you not paying attention during that time? The women were slammed, smeared, accused of lying, etc and she was involved in the whole thing. Note that Hillary gave a blanket assurance to all women that they had a right to be heard and believed if they were sexually assaulted. Her actions, of course, and your reactions now, give the lie to that stance. What she (and you) REALLY mean is all women who claim rape are to be believed as long as they don't oppose her.

Or unless they are lying their asses off. Here's the problem, not a ONE of these women could have convicted Clinton of rape on the evidence they had. (Actually, what Willey and Jones alleged didn't get anywhere near 'rape'. So we are only talking about Brodderick, really.)

no prosecutor would prosecute a rape where the "victim" couldn't remember the day it happened, had sworn out an affadavit saying it didn't happen, and whose only corroborating witnesses have an ax to grind with the accused because he pardoned the man who killed their father.

That's not Hillary's stance. She says they have the right to be heard and believed. Her actions then, and your reaction now, give the lie to that stance.

 

[hadit]

Clinton was a womanizer who used his power to to get sex. Not much to admire about a man who used women for his own selfish gains.

Except the women were throwing themselves at him because he had power and fame. Here's the thing, guy. Whether you are talking about rock stars, movie stars, wealthy guys or politicians, women throw themselves at that. Probably because it's hard wired to want to mate to get the most advantagous genes.

Clinton is a bad guy because he gave in to women who were crawling over each other to get at him? I don't think so.

No, he's a bad guy because he lied, perverted the justice system to prevent a woman from having her day in court, and tried to destroy the women who dared to accuse him of sexual improprieties.

The thing with the powerful and famous, they often begin to believe that they're irresistible and end up doing exactly what Bubba did, force themselves where they're not wanted.

 

[thanatos144]

Joe,

why is having an adulterous affair 'consensual sex' and 'none of the public's business' .... when a Democrat is involved; yet, it is enough to demonize and drive a man from office or running for office when it involves (without proof) a Republican?

When Slick Willey was caught having an adulterous affair...and lying his ass off about it...Liberals argued, as you did, that it was 'consensual', 'none of the public's business', and that neither it nor the lies he told about it to the world / American people diminished his ability to be President (except for that lack of morals, ethics, him proving he can lie his ass off like a pro without blinking, etc...)

When Herman Cain was running for President the Left launched another despicable 'politics of personal destruction' campaign against him - they had women coming out of the woodwork accusing him of sexual 'misconduct'. Suddenly the same exact behavior DID matter and was grounds for him being eliminated as a candidate. (After he and his wife agreed they didn't want to put up with the despicable BS and he pulled out suddenly those women disappeared and the media suddenly treated his name like 'Lord Voldemort' in the Harry Potter series - his name was never mentioned again.

So why is it, exactly, that having affairs, sexually harassing, raping women, sending pictures of your Weiner to women...these are almost 'badges of honor' in all but the most extreme circumstances (it seems) for Liberals, who get a pass for such deplorable deviant behavior, but they demand that not be the same case for Republicans (with whom they have proven, if they can't find such behavior they simply make it up)?

Lil' Teddy Kennedy left a woman to die at the bottom of a water-filled ditch, running back home - abandoning her to die, just to protect the Kennedy name and his personal political future....no big deal. After all, he was a Kennedy and a Democrat.

Slick Willey: Pathological liar, career sexual deviant who sexually harassed, sexually assaulted, raped, and engaged in adulterous affairs his entire life....with his 'loving, devoted' wife right beside him 'sicking' private investigators on his female victims while she bullied, intimidated, and threatened them into silence to protect the Clinton 'Empire' and HER chance to be President...

John 'The Breck Girl' Edwards was cheating on his wife as she fought cancer...yeah, there's a real winner, huh ladies?!

Al Gore couldn't keep it in his pants around other women, either, and he and Tipper were divorced due to his infidelity (w/Laurie David).

Anthony Weiner just couldn't keep it in his pants - he couldn't keep it off the INTERNET!

Democrats want to be rock starts in the public eye, going for the highest most visible positions they can get then squeal about how their sexual deviancy and 'mis-steps' are no one else's business....but like jackals, they go after any Republican engaging gin the same activity (which I actually have no problem with - just judge 'em all the same').

It's just the double-standards and hypocrisy the Liberals engage in that is pathetic. Glass Houses and throwing stones, you know....and most Liberals don't have 1 window in their 'house' NOT broken.....

Spot on

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk