Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

prisonforrape.webp
 
Thanki you for conceding you made a really stupid statement. That is the reason you are defending your stupidity.

You are the one trying to fight a battle you lost in a HUMILIATING fashion 20 years ago. Seriously, guy do you not get this. Clinton Humiliated you guys. Gingrich lost his job, Clinton kept his. Why do you all think this is going to go better for you this time?

Been covered so many times in so many threads, links and all. Google it yourself Joey boy.

Yes, guy. It has. To recap. Ken the Perv spent 70 million dollars sniffing panties when he was supposed to be getting to the bottom of a land deal. Republicans tried to impeach the man over a private matter, and OUTRAGED voters turned on you guys.

I didn't fight it 20 years ago. You said he lied because of family you are wrong. You keep trying to move the goal posts of what you said. Go back, re-read and you might understand what the heck you posted. :dunno: You are a special kind of dumb.
 
BFD. She was into it, told her friends she had her presidential kneepads before she left Cal. Women! lol

Degrade them, the hater Dem way. Hillary has set your example.
Hillary didn't do a gd thing, dupe. lol

Hillary went after those accusing Bill dummy. Your are truly a partisan nut job. Try thinking for once.
Link to that bs gossip/propaganda, dupe?
 
BFD. She was into it, told her friends she had her presidential kneepads before she left Cal. Women! lol

Degrade them, the hater Dem way. Hillary has set your example.
Hillary didn't do a gd thing, dupe. lol

Hillary went after those accusing Bill dummy. Your are truly a partisan nut job. Try thinking for once.
Link to that bs gossip/propaganda, dupe?

Franco, google it, it's been posted time and again, you idiots just keep asking and asking, try researching nutjob.
 
didn't fight it 20 years ago. You said he lied because of family you are wrong. You keep trying to move the goal posts of what you said. Go back, re-read and you might understand what the heck you posted. :dunno: You are a special kind of dumb.

Wow, guy, I don't even think you know what you are arguing anymore.

When you figure it out, get back to me.
 
didn't fight it 20 years ago. You said he lied because of family you are wrong. You keep trying to move the goal posts of what you said. Go back, re-read and you might understand what the heck you posted. :dunno: You are a special kind of dumb.

Wow, guy, I don't even think you know what you are arguing anymore.

When you figure it out, get back to me.

Ok moron this is your original statement and my original response:

Yes, he was not admitting to something that would hurt his family, which was the intent of the right wing assholes who bankrupted Paula Jones promising the poor thing a payday.

If he didn't want to hurt his family he should have not have agreed to get sucked off in the White House. If he didn't want to hurt his family he probably should not have screwed Jennifer Flowers. If he didn't want to hurt his family he probably should have tried to sexually assault Paula Jones.

So him caring about his family so much is a pretty a ignorant excuse.

I only addressed your to the fact you said he didn't want to hurt his family, nothing else. The investigation, what happened with The special prosecutor or whether he was right or wrong?

The fact is he didn't give a shit if he was going to hurt his family.
 
I only addressed your to the fact you said he didn't want to hurt his family, nothing else. The investigation, what happened with The special prosecutor or whether he was right or wrong?

The fact is he didn't give a shit if he was going to hurt his family.

Of course he did. But since you've brainwashed yourself into thinking the Clintons are inhuman monsters, you don't get that they would be capable of the same human fallacies that you are.

Hey, guy, if I had a 70 million dollar budget to turn over every rock in your life with intention of humiliating you, would I find absolutely nothing you are ashamed of or no one who was willing to say bad stuff about you if I offered them enough money or threatened them with subpoenas? I doubt it.
 
I only addressed your to the fact you said he didn't want to hurt his family, nothing else. The investigation, what happened with The special prosecutor or whether he was right or wrong?

The fact is he didn't give a shit if he was going to hurt his family.

Of course he did. But since you've brainwashed yourself into thinking the Clintons are inhuman monsters, you don't get that they would be capable of the same human fallacies that you are.

Hey, guy, if I had a 70 million dollar budget to turn over every rock in your life with intention of humiliating you, would I find absolutely nothing you are ashamed of or no one who was willing to say bad stuff about you if I offered them enough money or threatened them with subpoenas? I doubt it.

Doesn't matter who did it, take politic's out of it, I'd feel the same way. So all the rest of your post, you are using to cloud an issue.

Cosby is scum, he didn't give a damn if he hurt his family or not.
 
Doesn't matter who did it, take politic's out of it, I'd feel the same way. So all the rest of your post, you are using to cloud an issue.

Cosby is scum, he didn't give a damn if he hurt his family or not.

Cosby, I thought you were talking about Clinton.... I think you are confusing yourself.

Point was, Ken Starr spent 70 million on top of what the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy spent dragging $100 bills through trailer parks, and the worst that they could prove was that Clinton lied about a blow job because he didn't want to get the stink eye from Hillary over breakfast.
 
Doesn't matter who did it, take politic's out of it, I'd feel the same way. So all the rest of your post, you are using to cloud an issue.

Cosby is scum, he didn't give a damn if he hurt his family or not.

Cosby, I thought you were talking about Clinton.... I think you are confusing yourself.

Point was, Ken Starr spent 70 million on top of what the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy spent dragging $100 bills through trailer parks, and the worst that they could prove was that Clinton lied about a blow job because he didn't want to get the stink eye from Hillary over breakfast.
Clinton broke the law. End of story

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
Clinton broke the law. End of story

Except he never should have been put in that position to start with, and most Americans thought what was done to him was pretty sleazy.

Which is why he stayed in office and Gingrich was given the heave-ho.
Oh I see . So democrats should never have to answer for sexual misconduct in the workplace.... gotcha. .... you are a idiot

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
Oh I see . So democrats should never have to answer for sexual misconduct in the workplace.... gotcha. .... you are a idiot

Guy, if we went around arresting everyone who had sex with a coworker, we'd have some pretty ******* crowded prisons.

Clinton had CONSENSUAL sex with a legal adult. There's no "misconduct" here.
 
Doesn't matter who did it, take politic's out of it, I'd feel the same way. So all the rest of your post, you are using to cloud an issue.

Cosby is scum, he didn't give a damn if he hurt his family or not.

Cosby, I thought you were talking about Clinton.... I think you are confusing yourself.

Point was, Ken Starr spent 70 million on top of what the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy spent dragging $100 bills through trailer parks, and the worst that they could prove was that Clinton lied about a blow job because he didn't want to get the stink eye from Hillary over breakfast.

Dumb shit, the thread is about comparing the two. If you can't follow along then there is no point in dealing with you.

Again, I don't care about special prosecutor or not. Clinton did not lie to protect his family. You know damn good and well with the all the women he fooled around with, Hillary knew he was a cheater.

So back to point, Bill Clinton lied to protect Bill Clinton, no one else, not his family, just Bill Clinton.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Oh I see . So democrats should never have to answer for sexual misconduct in the workplace.... gotcha. .... you are a idiot

Guy, if we went around arresting everyone who had sex with a coworker, we'd have some pretty ******* crowded prisons.

Clinton had CONSENSUAL sex with a legal adult. There's no "misconduct" here.

There is misconduct, any HR department would call having sexual relations with a subordinate as misconduct.

What is amusing is Clinton signed a billed that allowed Paula Jones to bring in his other affairs and sexual improprieties. Trying to appear like he cared about women and their rights, he screwed himself.
 
Oh I see . So democrats should never have to answer for sexual misconduct in the workplace.... gotcha. .... you are a idiot

Guy, if we went around arresting everyone who had sex with a coworker, we'd have some pretty ******* crowded prisons.

Clinton had CONSENSUAL sex with a legal adult. There's no "misconduct" here.
What job do you have that you can **** the interns at work and not get fired for sexual misconduct?

Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
 
Dumb shit, the thread is about comparing the two. If you can't follow along then there is no point in dealing with you.

Oh, that's a relief. I thought you got confused and conflated the two because you were frothing at the mouth.

Oh, wait. That's still probably what happened.

Again, I don't care about special prosecutor or not. Clinton did not lie to protect his family. You know damn good and well with the all the women he fooled around with, Hillary knew he was a cheater.

Actually, I don't know that at all, and neither do you. You aren't part of that relationship. We know that in a 40 something year marriage, he had two DOCUMENTED affairs, and a lot of women who made claims that really can't be substantiated one way or the other.

So back to point, Bill Clinton lied to protect Bill Clinton, no one else, not his family, just Bill Clinton.

Well, if that makes you feel better about the disgusting 70 million dollar witch hunt your side engaged in, fine. Frankly, I wish we had focused on more important issues in the 1990's.

There is misconduct, any HR department would call having sexual relations with a subordinate as misconduct.

The White House isn't an HR Department. And since she was an unpaid intern, it's kind of questionable if she would even qualify as a subordinate. But never mind.

Real world, last job I was at we had a Sales manager who was ******* one of the customer Service Gals. The brilliant solution was not to fire them, but to move her over to Purchasing. But that's the real world. Where you have real people dealing with real problems. ANd most of us don't have people spending millions of dollars to **** with us.

What is amusing is Clinton signed a billed that allowed Paula Jones to bring in his other affairs and sexual improprieties. Trying to appear like he cared about women and their rights, he screwed himself.

Uh, no, not really. Jones' case was dismissed as HAVING ABSOLUTELY NO MERIT!!!!

You guys keep skipping over that little detail. She didn't have a legal leg to stand on even if everything she said was true, which it probably wasn't.
 
What job do you have that you can **** the interns at work and not get fired for sexual misconduct?

One in the real world. Where people have affairs. I know in my career of at least four cases were managers or supervisors were sleeping with their subordinates. No one was fired. And that's what I know about, because I go OUT OF MY WAY to not get involved in office politics.

Heck, we had a case where everyone assumed our GM was banging our Purchasing Manager, until we found out she was gay.

No, you see, when a guy gets fired for sexual harrassment, it's usually because he's a pig no one likes. But you probably already knew that.
 
Back
Top Bottom