Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Good grief, Bill Clinton never raped anyone. It seems pretty apparent that Bill Cosby raped numerous women. Are you so blind that you do not understand the difference?


again....all these women here and in the U.K. say he either raped them or sexually assaulted them......all of them...and only bill clinton is telling the truth........
 
Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

NO, actually, it's about policy. Regardless of what the bribed bimbos have said about Clinton-42. (Get used to calling him that, because Clinton-45 is coming!) Clinton was on the right side of subjects the 99.999% of women who didn't have sex with him cared about- Reproductive rights, equal pay, family and medical leave.

Meanwhile, Bill Cosby was busy calling single mothers nasty names when he wasn't drugging women to rape them.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

The only reason why Right Wingers care about "Muslim Women" is because they are standing on top of a shitload of oil. If you believe otherwise, you are ******* delusional. And they will send young working class men and women off to die for that oil. Except people are calling bullshit on that one now.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal.

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Or that we found that most of these women were liars.


Liars?:uhh:

 
"While Bill Cosby is finally doing a long overdue perp walk for an alleged sexual assault some 10 years ago, and I say “long overdue” because dozens of woman claim he did the same to them over the decades, the dozen or so women who claim to be victims of Bill and Hillary Clinton are being victimized once again by a DC Mediacircling the wagons to protect Hillary, a woman they are desperate to see become president."

Libs on this board continue to circle the wagons, as well.... :p
 
Then why was he brought to court over SEXUAL ABUSE and settled out of court for $850,000, LOST his law lisc. for LYING and fined $250,000! I wonder how many times these ******* stupid LOW 2 digit IQ'D liberal Clinton lovers will continue with this bullshit...I bet at least half a dozen other DemoRATS will do it! Any bets?

Uh, guy, the case was dismissed without MERIT.

Also, his law license (which he wasn't using) was suspended, not lost. Oh, yeah, and he only paid a $10,000 fine.


Joey loves lying, rapist, scum. leftists and islamonazis:cuckoo:
 
Mark Steyn nails it:

"I mean that as a seriously question incidentally," Steyn said. "Why is Bill Cosby finished? He was the most beloved guy. We keep hearing Bill Clinton is the most beloved guy in America. 'If Bill Clinton was on the ticket, he'd sweep all 50 states. It would be a landslide. Americans love Bill Clinton.' They loved Bill Cosby – nice grandfatherly Bill Cosby. But somehow, for some reason – you don't see 'The Bill Cosby Show' on TV anymore. You don't see it on the rerun channels. He is not appearing anywhere."

"You'd almost think it's some kind of like racism thing," he continued. "That somehow, when a bunch of women make accusations against the black guy – boom, he's vaporized. When a bunch of women make accusations against some white southern redneck — we're talking about putting him back in the White House for another eight years as First Gentleman."

Well, it would help if the women accusing Cosby were all gold-digging liars like the ones who accused Clinton, most of whom Ken Starr didn't even believe.
If Trump was caught screwing his hired staff half his age you Leftards would be ranting about it 24/7.
 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
 
Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

bill clinton participated in relationships with CONSENTING ADULTS, idiota.

bill cosby may have drugged women and divested them of their right to consent or not consent.

see how that works, moron?
You calling someone a moron?..... Rape lefty girl .......Get it through your brainwashed head:slap:

 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
Everything is selective outrage with progressives...
Political correctness is their Bible
 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
Everything is selective outrage with progressives...
Political correctness is their Bible
Making excuses for Rapist isn't politically correct actually...It's sad though
 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
Everything is selective outrage with progressives...
Political correctness is their Bible
Making excuses for Rapist isn't politically correct actually...It's sad though
It is when situational morality is their go to, They can't help being control freaks...
 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
Everything is selective outrage with progressives...
Political correctness is their Bible
Making excuses for Rapist isn't politically correct actually...It's sad though
It is when situational morality is their go to, They can't help being control freaks...
You mean they define their own morality.. it's much easier that way
 
Cosby reportedly drugged beautiful women to have zombie sex with them. Bill Clinton flirted with gold diggers who were seeking their 15 minutes of fame and money. See the difference?

Yep, we see the difference, a white man you OK with his sexual assults, a black man, burn at the stake. So typical liberal.
Everything is selective outrage with progressives...
Political correctness is their Bible
Making excuses for Rapist isn't politically correct actually...It's sad though
It is when situational morality is their go to, They can't help being control freaks...
You mean they define their own morality.. it's much easier that way
Yes, They define their own morality depending on the situations they find themselves in, and/or how many votes they can get out of putting their finger to the wind. Political Correctness is their Bible
 
  • Rape-Hoaxer Lena Dunham Supports White Bill Clinton, Blasts Black Bill Cosby
    Breitbart ^
    Almost a dozen women have accused Bill Clinton of everything from outright rape to groping to harassment to characters assassination. Nevertheless rape-hoaxer Lena Dunham vigorously supports making Bill Clinton America’s first First Gentleman and making his chief-enabler, Hillary Clinton, the next president of the United States. If Dunahm’s standards on the issue of victimizing women are this low, why then is she publicly calling for Bill Cosby’s head?
 
  • Rape-Hoaxer Lena Dunham Supports White Bill Clinton, Blasts Black Bill Cosby
    Breitbart ^
    Almost a dozen women have accused Bill Clinton of everything from outright rape to groping to harassment to characters assassination. Nevertheless rape-hoaxer Lena Dunham vigorously supports making Bill Clinton America’s first First Gentleman and making his chief-enabler, Hillary Clinton, the next president of the United States. If Dunahm’s standards on the issue of victimizing women are this low, why then is she publicly calling for Bill Cosby’s head?
Morals are only cool, when they suit progressive's behavior...
 
Never give up, Alamo Girls.

Never give up. Maybe you can get someone to investigate it.

Or something.


How about a panty sniffing partisan prosecutor with Starr power and 70 million dollars? That's the ticket.

Oh, it's been done? Awww.
 
He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!
You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,


He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.


A BLOW JOB isn't SEX, what is it, a ******* HOT DOG????? Please POST link to a BLOW JOB NOT A SEX ACT....Hell Fugly gets a quarter a shot, on her corner for those!

You and your cohort rustic are too stupid to comprehend what Clinton was doing, but for the sake of intelligent people I will offer this.
Clinton was careful to use the phrase "sexual relations". He did no say he did not have a sex act. Sexual relations have a legal definition and Clinton used the definition that sexual relations require coitus, sexual intercourse. According to this definition, fondling and oral sex do not come under the definition of "sexual relations". The confusion arises and the controversy occurs because many dictionaries give different definitions. Clinton however, used the interpretation accepted in the legal arena.

What Clinton did was give an answer that was literally true, but non-responsive. Did he have sex by indulging in a sex act, yes, but that was not the question or the video response Clinton was giving. Clinton was a lawyer and even taught some law classes. He would have been familiar with the SCOTUS ruling in Bronston vs. United States that allowed respondents to answer questions in non-responsive ways if not asked for a specific literal answer. Attorneys eventually demanded those literal answers and he was obligated to give accurate answers, but as for the video being promoted in this thread, Clinton was technically telling the truth. He "...did not have sexual relations with that woman...".

scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3457&context=cklawreview
 
15th post
Clinton did not know what the definition of 'is' is

-Geaux
 
BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!
You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,


He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.


A BLOW JOB isn't SEX, what is it, a ******* HOT DOG????? Please POST link to a BLOW JOB NOT A SEX ACT....Hell Fugly gets a quarter a shot, on her corner for those!

You and your cohort rustic are too stupid to comprehend what Clinton was doing, but for the sake of intelligent people I will offer this.
Clinton was careful to use the phrase "sexual relations". He did no say he did not have a sex act. Sexual relations have a legal definition and Clinton used the definition that sexual relations require coitus, sexual intercourse. According to this definition, fondling and oral sex do not come under the definition of "sexual relations". The confusion arises and the controversy occurs because many dictionaries give different definitions. Clinton however, used the interpretation accepted in the legal arena.

What Clinton did was give an answer that was literally true, but non-responsive. Did he have sex by indulging in a sex act, yes, but that was not the question or the video response Clinton was giving. Clinton was a lawyer and even taught some law classes. He would have been familiar with the SCOTUS ruling in Bronston vs. United States that allowed respondents to answer questions in non-responsive ways if not asked for a specific literal answer. Attorneys eventually demanded those literal answers and he was obligated to give accurate answers, but as for the video being promoted in this thread, Clinton was technically telling the truth. He "...did not have sexual relations with that woman...".

scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3457&context=cklawreview


People are free to accept the rants of hateful knuckleheads who have reputations as pathological liars, or they can believe some guy who writes legal briefs at a law school and the SCOTUS.
 
You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,


He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.



A BLOW JOB isn't SEX, what is it, a ******* HOT DOG????? Please POST link to a BLOW JOB NOT A SEX ACT....Hell Fugly gets a quarter a shot, on her corner for those!

You and your cohort rustic are too stupid to comprehend what Clinton was doing, but for the sake of intelligent people I will offer this.
Clinton was careful to use the phrase "sexual relations". He did no say he did not have a sex act. Sexual relations have a legal definition and Clinton used the definition that sexual relations require coitus, sexual intercourse. According to this definition, fondling and oral sex do not come under the definition of "sexual relations". The confusion arises and the controversy occurs because many dictionaries give different definitions. Clinton however, used the interpretation accepted in the legal arena.

What Clinton did was give an answer that was literally true, but non-responsive. Did he have sex by indulging in a sex act, yes, but that was not the question or the video response Clinton was giving. Clinton was a lawyer and even taught some law classes. He would have been familiar with the SCOTUS ruling in Bronston vs. United States that allowed respondents to answer questions in non-responsive ways if not asked for a specific literal answer. Attorneys eventually demanded those literal answers and he was obligated to give accurate answers, but as for the video being promoted in this thread, Clinton was technically telling the truth. He "...did not have sexual relations with that woman...".

scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3457&context=cklawreview


People are free to accept the rants of hateful knuckleheads who have reputations as pathological liars, or they can believe some guy who writes legal briefs at a law school and the SCOTUS.
When you put someone's willie in your mouth, do you think you're having sexual relations with them? Let's leave the brilliant legal minds out of it and go to someone with doubtless extensive experience.
 
Asshole, it was dismissed BECAUSE IT WAS SETTLED OUT OF COURT FOR $850,000.. If it doesn't go to court it is DISMISSED!

Uh, no, it was dismissed by Judge Susan Weber Wright.

Washingtonpost.com: Jones v. Clinton Special Report

April 1, 1998
blpix.gif

Federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright dismisses Jones's lawsuit, granting President Clinton's request for summary judgment in the case.

November 13, 1998
blpix.gif

President Clinton reaches an out-of-court settlement with Jones, agreeing to pay her $850,000 but acknowledging no wrongdoing.

December 2, 1998
blpix.gif

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismisses Jones's appeal in response to the settlement.

So the case was dismissed without merit and Clinton settled without admitting wrongdoing.

The whore Jones then went on to pose for Penthouse because she was SOOOOOOOO Traumatized
 
Back
Top Bottom