Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

[Camp]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

 

[Vigilante]

• Bill Clinton’s Sexual Assault Victims List Just Grew A Lot Longer
  http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/bill-clintons-sexual-assault-victims-list-just-grew-a-lot-longer ^
  When people think about former President Bill Clinton's despicable behavior, they think mainly of Monica Lewinsky, Kathleen Willey and perhaps even Paula Jones. In doing so, they forget about Clinton's many other victims. Even CNN admits that a whole lot more women have been abused than most people realize. "There are about 14 women who could be said to have made claims at one time or another (about Bill Clinton," CNN contributor Errol Louis accidentally revealed on air this Thursday morning. Once he realized that he had just let the cat out of the bag, he quickly tried to backtrack:...

 

[Lakhota]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

Hillary has better morals and family values than the NaziCon trash who repeatedly smear her with lies.

 

[Rustic]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

The point is that you are missing... The two of them are lowest of character.

 

[Vigilante]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

I imagine that OLD Trump accusation will accomplish EVEN LESS, undoubtedly GAIN him more popularity as everything the left throws at his does!

 

[Vigilante]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

Hillary has better morals and family values than the NaziCon trash who repeatedly smear her with lies.

Oh my, NOW the lesbian Squaw is getting pissed talking about her IDOL!

 

[Rustic]

All this crap was rejected as meaningless crap when it was new news. Now it is old news and still crap that will be rejected. It will have little if any negative effects on Hillary's campaign. It will probably get her sympathy for the nasty attack and support for saving her marriage.

Hillary has better morals and family values than the NaziCon trash who repeatedly smear her with lies.

She's a Clinton, nowhere is there ethics, no morals and no character.

 

[Camp]

Is that like the hooker who claimed Clinton fathered her child, and then DNA tests proved otherwise?

Clinton never offered to submit to a paternity test to prove that the accusation was false, BUT you can also LIE about that.... He sure do looks like Blow Job with a SUN TAN!

Why should anyone ever believe you about anything?

aim.org/media-monitor/clinton-didnt-father-hookers-son/

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

 

[Rustic]

Clinton never offered to submit to a paternity test to prove that the accusation was false, BUT you can also LIE about that.... He sure do looks like Blow Job with a SUN TAN!

Why should anyone ever believe you about anything?

aim.org/media-monitor/clinton-didnt-father-hookers-son/

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

 

[Vigilante]

Clinton never offered to submit to a paternity test to prove that the accusation was false, BUT you can also LIE about that.... He sure do looks like Blow Job with a SUN TAN!

Why should anyone ever believe you about anything?

aim.org/media-monitor/clinton-didnt-father-hookers-son/

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

The DNA test is NOT a public record, only the testimony, as you asswipe, seem to think that ANY PHYSICAL EVIDENCE is available for anyone to access! You haven't the foggiest idea of what you talk about!

 

[jillian]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

bill clinton participated in relationships with CONSENTING ADULTS, idiota.

bill cosby may have drugged women and divested them of their right to consent or not consent.

see how that works, moron?

 

[Rustic]

President Clinton impeached - Dec 19, 1998 - HISTORY.com

 

[Rustic]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

bill clinton participated in relationships with CONSENTING ADULTS, idiota.

bill cosby may have drugged women and divested them of their right to consent or not consent.

see how that works, moron?

Consenting adults?? were you there??
I don't Think any of us were, but the people involved.
That Sorry sack of shit deserves the legacy...


President Clinton impeached - Dec 19, 1998 - HISTORY.com

 

[Care4all]

President Clinton impeached - Dec 19, 1998 - HISTORY.com

President Clinton acquitted - Feb 12, 1999 - HISTORY.com

 

[Vigilante]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

bill clinton participated in relationships with CONSENTING ADULTS, idiota.

bill cosby may have drugged women and divested them of their right to consent or not consent.

see how that works, moron?

Then why was he brought to court over SEXUAL ABUSE and settled out of court for $850,000, LOST his law lisc. for LYING and fined $250,000! I wonder how many times these ******* stupid LOW 2 digit IQ'D liberal Clinton lovers will continue with this bullshit...I bet at least half a dozen other DemoRATS will do it! Any bets?

 

[Camp]

Why should anyone ever believe you about anything?

aim.org/media-monitor/clinton-didnt-father-hookers-son/

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.

 

[Vigilante]

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.

A BLOW JOB isn't SEX, what is it, a ******* HOT DOG????? Please POST link to a BLOW JOB NOT A SEX ACT....Hell Fugly gets a quarter a shot, on her corner for those!

 

[Rustic]

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.

And you know this how??
The Sorry sack of shit lied under oath repeatedly, not one reason to believe the dumbass ******. Only a fool would trust the lowest of life forms and his dumbass wife the Hildabeast

 

[Vigilante]

Left wing LIES, as always, just like Clinton SUPPOSEDLY took a DNA test...which he didn't! You'll believe ANYTHING that some commie site prints!

He was forced to submit DNA during the impeachment to confirm the semen on the blue dress.

BUT was NOT used for a paternity test, BUT I don't expect YOU to understand that what was acquired as EVIDENCE in a Congressional trial, could NOT be used to prove a paternity accusation, especially WITHOUT a COURT TRIAL that never happened! Damn, TOO ******* EASY to slap down the stupid!

You insisted he never gave a DNA test. Now you are agreeing he did, but presenting yourself as a knowledgeable legal expert; Your specialty seems to be how a court's or congressional records are sealed forever and unobtainable. Perhaps you missed the class on public records,

He was telling the truth. A bj is not having sex. Drove the haters crazy back then and will drive them crazy again if they are dumb enough to try and use it again. Sexual relations has a well defined legal definition and bj's are not included in it. Now, maybe you will comprehend why he was called Slick Willie. He tricked the public by telling the truth a certain way. He was not lying.

BTW, last time I read a PENAL CODE, ORAL SEX was mentioned, as was ANAL SEX!

 

[auditor0007]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Good grief, Bill Clinton never raped anyone. It seems pretty apparent that Bill Cosby raped numerous women. Are you so blind that you do not understand the difference?