Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

[billyerock1991]

Juanita Broderick accused Clinton of rape,

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Paula Jones accused Clinton of using his office and power to try to have sex with Clinton.

Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

Kathleen Willey claims Clinton abused his powers when he groped her.

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]

Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

it amazes me here this right wing nut job pulls out of his ass all these allege rapes... the one that cracked me up the most was Gennifer flowers ... who never claimed any kind of sexual assault ... but this ass clowns posted she was quid pro quo, post incident character assault by clinton... she was never charter assaulted ... she had and affair with clinton and had to testify about the affair under oath ...these women were dragged into this bull shit frenzy fess by the republicans... flowers was forced to testify at his hearing ... then they tried to get these women to testify at his hearing too... they wouldn't testify ... the reason they wouldn't, what we all found out and the republicans frothing at the mouth found out they were all looking for money, accept flowers ... she was forced by the republicans to testify ... what the republicans found out that the women this ass clown posted would be lying under oath ... I've seen that list before and each and everyone said it never happen, after they claimed it had...when they were pushed to testify ... they knew they could go to jail for lying under oath ... but you continually get these ass clowns printing this list that they get from Whirlynutdaily with all these allegations .. I get tired of posting every one of their answers when they were pushed to testify ... good going you made these ass clowns look stupid

They never tire of being fools. These are the type that made the American public look at the Clinton scandals and reject and trash them. The promoters turned out to be obscene, crude, dishonest hacks, just like the ones posting here.

they are so stuck in the hate anything den/liberal that they can't see the are voting against their ow benefit

 

[Jroc]

Juanita Broderick accused Clinton of rape,

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Paula Jones accused Clinton of using his office and power to try to have sex with Clinton.

Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

Kathleen Willey claims Clinton abused his powers when he groped her.

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]

Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

it amazes me here this right wing nut job pulls out of his ass all these allege rapes... the one that cracked me up the most was Gennifer flowers ... who never claimed any kind of sexual assault ... but this ass clowns posted she was quid pro quo, post incident character assault by clinton... she was never charter assaulted ... she had and affair with clinton and had to testify about the affair under oath ...these women were dragged into this bull shit frenzy fess by the republicans... flowers was forced to testify at his hearing ... then they tried to get these women to testify at his hearing too... they wouldn't testify ... the reason they wouldn't, what we all found out and the republicans frothing at the mouth found out they were all looking for money, accept flowers ... she was forced by the republicans to testify ... what the republicans found out that the women this ass clown posted would be lying under oath ... I've seen that list before and each and everyone said it never happen, after they claimed it had...when they were pushed to testify ... they knew they could go to jail for lying under oath ... but you continually get these ass clowns printing this list that they get from Whirlynutdaily with all these allegations .. I get tired of posting every one of their answers when they were pushed to testify ... good going you made these ass clowns look stupid

They never tire of being fools. These are the type that made the American public look at the Clinton scandals and reject and trash them. The promoters turned out to be obscene, crude, dishonest hacks, just like the ones posting here.

The left's war on women is alive and well....This women is a liar?

 

[paperview]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

 

[Jroc]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? Why do you slander raped women?...

 

[Moonglow]

Juanita Broderick accused Clinton of rape,

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Paula Jones accused Clinton of using his office and power to try to have sex with Clinton.

Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

Kathleen Willey claims Clinton abused his powers when he groped her.

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]

Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

it amazes me here this right wing nut job pulls out of his ass all these allege rapes... the one that cracked me up the most was Gennifer flowers ... who never claimed any kind of sexual assault ... but this ass clowns posted she was quid pro quo, post incident character assault by clinton... she was never charter assaulted ... she had and affair with clinton and had to testify about the affair under oath ...these women were dragged into this bull shit frenzy fess by the republicans... flowers was forced to testify at his hearing ... then they tried to get these women to testify at his hearing too... they wouldn't testify ... the reason they wouldn't, what we all found out and the republicans frothing at the mouth found out they were all looking for money, accept flowers ... she was forced by the republicans to testify ... what the republicans found out that the women this ass clown posted would be lying under oath ... I've seen that list before and each and everyone said it never happen, after they claimed it had...when they were pushed to testify ... they knew they could go to jail for lying under oath ... but you continually get these ass clowns printing this list that they get from Whirlynutdaily with all these allegations .. I get tired of posting every one of their answers when they were pushed to testify ... good going you made these ass clowns look stupid

They never tire of being fools. These are the type that made the American public look at the Clinton scandals and reject and trash them. The promoters turned out to be obscene, crude, dishonest hacks, just like the ones posting here.

The left's war on women is alive and well....This women is a liar?

So the entire political left raped this women, or the entire political left supported the rape of this women,,in your twisted logic?

 

[paperview]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

 

[Jroc]

She never brought charges and she signed a sworn affidavit she was not raped.

Went to court and had her case thrown out as being "without merit."

And Kathleen Willey, that ****ed mess of a woman, said she was groped, only to find out after said groping, she wrote Bill Clinton love letters praising him, asking for jobs, and even asked for a freaking Ambassadorship! [The Willey-Clinton Letters]

Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

it amazes me here this right wing nut job pulls out of his ass all these allege rapes... the one that cracked me up the most was Gennifer flowers ... who never claimed any kind of sexual assault ... but this ass clowns posted she was quid pro quo, post incident character assault by clinton... she was never charter assaulted ... she had and affair with clinton and had to testify about the affair under oath ...these women were dragged into this bull shit frenzy fess by the republicans... flowers was forced to testify at his hearing ... then they tried to get these women to testify at his hearing too... they wouldn't testify ... the reason they wouldn't, what we all found out and the republicans frothing at the mouth found out they were all looking for money, accept flowers ... she was forced by the republicans to testify ... what the republicans found out that the women this ass clown posted would be lying under oath ... I've seen that list before and each and everyone said it never happen, after they claimed it had...when they were pushed to testify ... they knew they could go to jail for lying under oath ... but you continually get these ass clowns printing this list that they get from Whirlynutdaily with all these allegations .. I get tired of posting every one of their answers when they were pushed to testify ... good going you made these ass clowns look stupid

They never tire of being fools. These are the type that made the American public look at the Clinton scandals and reject and trash them. The promoters turned out to be obscene, crude, dishonest hacks, just like the ones posting here.

The left's war on women is alive and well....This women is a liar?

So the entire political left raped this women, or the entire political left supported the rape of this women,,in your twisted logic?

The leftist scum will defend the rape of their own mother if it helps them politically

 

[Jroc]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

Forced by the Clinton machine, that stupid affidavit doesn't mean anything

 

[Moonglow]

Juanita Broderick....

Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?

She Changed Her Story:


In 1997, Broaddrick filed an affadavit with Paula Jones' lawyers saying Clinton did notassault her. In 1998, Broaddrick told Kenneth Starr's FBI investigators that she wasraped. Eventually, Broaddrick described the rape for several major news organizations.



Clinton Is Innocent: Broaddrick is either a liar or has an unreliable memory.

Clinton Is Guilty: Broaddrick's initial denials indicate only that she shunned publicity. That's why she never reported the rape; rebuffed advances from Clinton's political enemies who, in 1992, urged her to go public; and lied to Paula Jones' lawyers. She eventually told the FBI the truth in 1998 only because her son--a lawyer--advised her against lying to federal investigators. (At the time, it was reasonable to suspect she'd be hauled before a grand jury.) She granted media interviews only after her name was released by Paula Jones' lawyers, and after tabloids printed wildly untrue stories about her. Given her aversion to politics and celebrity, Broaddrick would seem to have little or nothing to gain by falsely accusing Clinton of rape. Clinton, on the other hand, has plenty to gain from falsely denying her charges.



She Told Friends:

Five people say Broaddrick told them about the rape immediately after it occurred. A friend and co-worker named Norma Kelsey says that, 21 years ago, she found a dazed Broaddrick with bloodied lip and torn pantyhose in their shared hotel room and Broaddrick explained that Clinton had just raped her. (Clinton is supposed to have bitten her on the lip just before raping her.) Her current husband--then her lover--says Broaddrick told him about the rape within a few days of the event. Broaddrick was, at the time, married to another man, whom she didn't tell about the assault. And three of Broaddrick's friends--one of whom is Kelsey's sister--say she told them about the rape shortly after it supposedly occurred.



Clinton Is Innocent: The friends' testimony isn't trustworthy. Kelsey and her sister have a grudge against Clinton because, as governor, he commuted the life sentence of the man who murdered their father. Broaddrick's current husband might lie on her behalf. Moreover, even if the friends are telling the truth, Broaddrick might have been lying 21 years ago. There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband?

Clinton Is Guilty: If five friends say her story hasn't changed over 21 years, we can conclude that either that she's an unusually consistent liar or that her memory is reliable.

it amazes me here this right wing nut job pulls out of his ass all these allege rapes... the one that cracked me up the most was Gennifer flowers ... who never claimed any kind of sexual assault ... but this ass clowns posted she was quid pro quo, post incident character assault by clinton... she was never charter assaulted ... she had and affair with clinton and had to testify about the affair under oath ...these women were dragged into this bull shit frenzy fess by the republicans... flowers was forced to testify at his hearing ... then they tried to get these women to testify at his hearing too... they wouldn't testify ... the reason they wouldn't, what we all found out and the republicans frothing at the mouth found out they were all looking for money, accept flowers ... she was forced by the republicans to testify ... what the republicans found out that the women this ass clown posted would be lying under oath ... I've seen that list before and each and everyone said it never happen, after they claimed it had...when they were pushed to testify ... they knew they could go to jail for lying under oath ... but you continually get these ass clowns printing this list that they get from Whirlynutdaily with all these allegations .. I get tired of posting every one of their answers when they were pushed to testify ... good going you made these ass clowns look stupid

They never tire of being fools. These are the type that made the American public look at the Clinton scandals and reject and trash them. The promoters turned out to be obscene, crude, dishonest hacks, just like the ones posting here.

The left's war on women is alive and well....This women is a liar?

So the entire political left raped this women, or the entire political left supported the rape of this women,,in your twisted logic?

The leftist scum will defend the rape of their own mother if it helps them politically

I doubt the raper would be alive if this leftist's mother twas raped...

 

[Redfish]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

how much did they pay her to sign it?

 

[paperview]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

Forced by the Clinton machine, that stupid affidavit doesn't mean anything

Nope.

You lose again.

She a liar.

Proven.

She couldn't even remember the month, never mind the day - it supposedly happened. She was cheating on her husband and made up the story.

There were so many holes in her story it wasn't funny. That's why the bloodthirsty Ken Starr dropped her like a rock.

 

[Jroc]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

how much did they pay her to sign it?

They didn't pay her she was threatened

 

[Jroc]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

Forced by the Clinton machine, that stupid affidavit doesn't mean anything

Nope.

You lose again.

She a liar.

Proven.

She couldn't even remember the month, never mind the day - it supposedly happened. She was cheating on her husband and made up the story.

There were so many holes in her story it wasn't funny. That's why the bloodthirsty Ken Starr dropped her like a rock.

WTF? she came out almost thirty years later ...you're a dumbass

 

[WheelieAddict]

Actually Cosby isn't finished. He will be able to defend himself in court as our great country tries to give every citizen a fair trial. Like Clinton. Both Clintons actually. Let the evidence speak and if it doesn't convict don't act like a terrorist deciding your own justice.

 

[paperview]

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

Forced by the Clinton machine, that stupid affidavit doesn't mean anything

Nope.

You lose again.

She a liar.

Proven.

She couldn't even remember the month, never mind the day - it supposedly happened. She was cheating on her husband and made up the story.

There were so many holes in her story it wasn't funny. That's why the bloodthirsty Ken Starr dropped her like a rock.

WTF? she came out almost thirty years later ...you're a dumbass

When you're supposedly brutally raped, most people remember at least the month it happened.

That kinda thing sticks with a person.

Also, for someone so viciously attacked, supposedly, you don't go a fundraiser a few weeks after in support of the supposed rapist.

We went all through this in the 90's. It didn't work then, it won't work now.

The American people saw through the Clinton hate machine and their dirty, sleazy rumor-mill tactics.

That's why Billy left office with sky high approval ratings.

 

[Jroc]

Who proved it? she made up the story? ..

Hey fuckface - She signed a sworn affidavit saying it never happened.

Either way, she a proven liar.

Forced by the Clinton machine, that stupid affidavit doesn't mean anything

Nope.

You lose again.

She a liar.

Proven.

She couldn't even remember the month, never mind the day - it supposedly happened. She was cheating on her husband and made up the story.

There were so many holes in her story it wasn't funny. That's why the bloodthirsty Ken Starr dropped her like a rock.

WTF? she came out almost thirty years later ...you're a dumbass

When you're supposedly brutally raped, most people remember at least the month it happened.

That kinda thing sticks with a person.

Also, for someone so viciously attacked, supposedly, you don't go a fundraiser a few weeks after in support of the supposed rapist.

We went all through this in the 90's. It didn't work then, it won't work now.

The American people saw through the Clinton hate machine and their dirty, sleazy rumor-mill tactics.

That's why Billy left office with sky high approval ratings.

who's to say what you remember? have you been raped? the Clintons are scum

 

[paperview]

And why the mid term elections of 1998, which historically should have been in favor of a large GOP win, turned out to be a historically bad one, with the D's even picking up seats.

The R's screwed the pooch.

And Newt the philanderer resigned in disgrace,

and Livingston, next philanderer up, didn't even get to hold the gavel, cause *he* was bopping chicks --

and we get Hastert, who, we find out later was raping little boys.

Nice crew there.

 

[Moonglow]

Answer? Because liberals are and have always been, self righteous hypocrites.

Because it isn't about women's rights and has never been. It's about power.

If it was about women's rights, liberals would care about how women are treated in muslims countries or even in the United States by muslim men.

If it was about women's rights, Nina Burleigh wouldn't have written she would give Clinton oral sex to keep abortion legal. "I'd Be Happy to Give Him [Oral Sex] Just to Thank Him for Keeping Abortion Legal" - Press Release - July 6, 1998 - Media Research Center

Liberals with a straight face, talk about the "Republicans war on women" but to this day, turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton's treatment of women.

Mark Steyn: Why Is Bill Cosby Finished While Bill Clinton Is Beloved?

Bill Clinton has already had his day of walking on hot coals....Bill Cosby is about to walk on his hot coals....

 

[Moonglow]

PC/Identity Politics have always been a one-way street only, of course.

Adding a little gas to the flame for the Left is the fact that Cosby made those comments several years ago challenging blacks to "pull up their pants" and start taking more responsibility for their lives. The PC Police couldn't have that, so he has been persona non grata with them since that time.

It really is looking like Cosby is a world-class creep and maybe a sick bastard on top of it. But all this stuff remains a one-way street only.
.

Bill Cosby is a liberal. A self-righteous liberal. He thought because he was a self-righteous liberal, he was protected from his actions. And he was right for a long time.

But, he finally got TOO self-righteous, moralizing to to other blacks, while he was raping women. He irritated the wrong people and they stopped protecting him.

That's the difference. It's still advantageous of those people (aka the media) to protect Clinton. They still need him. The minute that changes, they will turn on him as well.

His political leaning had nothing to do with his evil penis....

 

[Papageorgio]

....This women is a liar?

Absolutely. Proven liar.

Who proved it? she made up the story? Why do you slander raped women?...

He doesn't slander all women, just those that go after Democrats.