Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,524
- 2,288
Wasting away in prison is far worse punishment than being executed.
Not for someone who doesn't want to die...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasting away in prison is far worse punishment than being executed.
Yet, almost none on death rows ask to be executed. That has always been a very lame argument.Wasting away in prison is far worse punishment than being executed.
Prison is the retirement plan of the criminal class. On capital crimes, is see no need to fund their retirement. Sometimes, they deserve to rest from their evil work. Rest in peace, that is.Not for someone who doesn't want to die...
If anyone lied it was the Deep State feeding intelligence to bush
The same gang of liars and criminals that libs worship today
They are not intelligence gatherersI kinda doubt the left has any love for Cheney and Rumsfeld.
They are not intelligence gatherers
Intelligence is like stats. If you pick and choose sources, methods and sampling, you can prove anything.They were the lying "intelligence".
Intelligence is like stats. If you pick and choose sources, methods and sampling, you can prove anything.
Thanks. That's my point.
Kill the guy at the 7-11 and it's murder. Lie us into a war and kill thousands of innocent people and you get to retire to the ranch.
War isn't murder. War is war.
As I was saying.......we will justify the killing of innocent people when it suits our purpose.
If only that were true. It's what people tell themselves to justify their anti death penalty positions.Wasting away in prison is far worse punishment than being executed.
That is a rub and a big rub, but the system is largely self-correcting and weighted most of the time to give any defendant the benefit if there is one to be found, as it takes years for someone on death row to actually run out of appeals. I still favor keeping it in place.I used to support killing the condemned. If all of the condemned were guilty I could still go along with it, therein lies the problem.
Nope. If one innocent person exhausts all of their appeals and is executed, do we stand proud of our criminal justice system? "It was a horrible crime that someone needs to pay for with their life", is usually the attitude of the prosecution. They believe that the accused got justice. That does not mean that they are right.That is a rub and a big rub, but the system is largely self-correcting and weighted most of the time to give any defendant the benefit if there is one to be found, as it takes years for someone on death row to actually run out of appeals. I still favor keeping it in place.
That is where the endless appeals start and the advocacy people to the governors, appeals courts, amicus curie submissions, all the way to the Supreme Court. I am not going to say the system is perfect, although better with the advance of scientific forensics, but I am not in favor of tossing out the penalty. Some people do not deserve the air they breathe.Nope. If one innocent person exhausts all of their appeals and is executed, do we stand proud of our criminal justice system? "It was a horrible crime that someone needs to pay for with their life", is usually the attitude of the prosecution. They believe that the accused got justice. That does not mean that they are right.
Is posthumous exoneration an oxymoron?That is where the endless appeals start and the advocacy people to the governors, appeals courts, amicus curie submissions, all the way to the Supreme Court. I am not going to say the system is perfect, although better with the advance of scientific forensics, but I am not in favor of tossing out the penalty. Some people do not deserve the air they breathe.