Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
Do you believe in free speech?
Do you believe that people should be judged by their character, not their skin color?
Do you believe in freedom of religion?
If you believe these things, youāre probably not a progressive. You might think youāre a progressive. I used to think I was. My show, āThe Rubin Reportā was originally part of the progressive āThe Young Turksā network.
Progressives struck me as liberals but louder. Progressives were the nice guys; they looked out for the little guy; they cared about women and minorities; they embraced change.
Who wouldnāt want to be a progressive?
But over the last couple years, the meaning of the word āprogressiveā has changed.
Progressives used to say, āI may disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.ā Not anymore.
Banning speakers whose opinions you donāt agree with from college campuses ā thatās not progressive.
Prohibiting any words not approved of as āpolitically correctā thatās not progressive.
Putting āTrigger Warningsā on books, movies, music, anything that might offend people ā thatās not progressive either.
All of this has led me to be believe that much of the Left is no longer progressive, but regressive. This is one of the reasons Iāve spent so much time on my show talking about The Regressive Left.
This regressive ideology doesnāt judge people as individuals, but as a collective.
If youāre black, or female, or Muslim, or Hispanic or a member of any other minority group, youāre judged differently than the most evil of all things ā a white, Christian male. The Regressive Left ranks minority groups in a pecking order to compete in a kind of Oppression Olympics. Gold medal goes to the most offended.
Martin Luther King, Jr.ās dream that his children would be judged by their character and not their skin color was a liberal idea, but these days, itās not a progressive ideal.
And what about religious freedom ā the idea that no one else can tell you what you have to believe? Surely progressives still support that basic right.
Well, not so much.
Iām a married gay man, so you might think that I appreciate the government forcing a Christian baker or photographer or florist to act against their religion in order to cater, photograph or decorate my wedding. But youād be wrong. A government that can force Christians to violate their conscience can force me to violate mine. If a baker wonāt bake you a cake, find another baker, donāt demand the state tell him what to do with his private business.
Iām pro-choice. But a government that can force a group of Catholic nuns ā literally called the Little Sisters of the Poor ā to violate their faith and pay for abortion-inducing birth control can force anyone to do anything.
Thatās not progressive; thatās regressive!
Today's progressivism has become a faux-moral movement hurling charges of racism, bigotry, xenophobia, homophobia, Islamophobia and a slew of other meaningless buzzwords at anyone they disagree with.
The battle of ideas has been replaced by a battle of feelings, and outrage has replaced honesty. Diversity reigns supreme, as long as itās not that pesky diversity of thought.
This isnāt the recipe for a free society, itās a recipe for authoritarianism.
For these reasons, I can no longer call myself a progressive. I donāt really call myself a Democrat either. Iām a classical liberal, a free thinker, and as much as I donāt like to admit it, defending my liberal values has suddenly become a conservative position.
So, if you think people should be able to say what they think without being punished for it; that people should be judged by their behavior, not their skin color; and that people should be able to live the way that they want to live, without government interference, then thereās not much left on the left for you.
Iāll keep trying to explain that to progressives until Iām totally left out.
Iām Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report
Do you believe that people should be judged by their character, not their skin color?
Do you believe in freedom of religion?
If you believe these things, youāre probably not a progressive. You might think youāre a progressive. I used to think I was. My show, āThe Rubin Reportā was originally part of the progressive āThe Young Turksā network.
Progressives struck me as liberals but louder. Progressives were the nice guys; they looked out for the little guy; they cared about women and minorities; they embraced change.
Who wouldnāt want to be a progressive?
But over the last couple years, the meaning of the word āprogressiveā has changed.
Progressives used to say, āI may disagree with what you say, but I will fight to the death for your right to say it.ā Not anymore.
Banning speakers whose opinions you donāt agree with from college campuses ā thatās not progressive.
Prohibiting any words not approved of as āpolitically correctā thatās not progressive.
Putting āTrigger Warningsā on books, movies, music, anything that might offend people ā thatās not progressive either.
All of this has led me to be believe that much of the Left is no longer progressive, but regressive. This is one of the reasons Iāve spent so much time on my show talking about The Regressive Left.
This regressive ideology doesnāt judge people as individuals, but as a collective.
If youāre black, or female, or Muslim, or Hispanic or a member of any other minority group, youāre judged differently than the most evil of all things ā a white, Christian male. The Regressive Left ranks minority groups in a pecking order to compete in a kind of Oppression Olympics. Gold medal goes to the most offended.
Martin Luther King, Jr.ās dream that his children would be judged by their character and not their skin color was a liberal idea, but these days, itās not a progressive ideal.
And what about religious freedom ā the idea that no one else can tell you what you have to believe? Surely progressives still support that basic right.
Well, not so much.
Iām a married gay man, so you might think that I appreciate the government forcing a Christian baker or photographer or florist to act against their religion in order to cater, photograph or decorate my wedding. But youād be wrong. A government that can force Christians to violate their conscience can force me to violate mine. If a baker wonāt bake you a cake, find another baker, donāt demand the state tell him what to do with his private business.
Iām pro-choice. But a government that can force a group of Catholic nuns ā literally called the Little Sisters of the Poor ā to violate their faith and pay for abortion-inducing birth control can force anyone to do anything.
Thatās not progressive; thatās regressive!
Today's progressivism has become a faux-moral movement hurling charges of racism, bigotry, xenophobia, homophobia, Islamophobia and a slew of other meaningless buzzwords at anyone they disagree with.
The battle of ideas has been replaced by a battle of feelings, and outrage has replaced honesty. Diversity reigns supreme, as long as itās not that pesky diversity of thought.
This isnāt the recipe for a free society, itās a recipe for authoritarianism.
For these reasons, I can no longer call myself a progressive. I donāt really call myself a Democrat either. Iām a classical liberal, a free thinker, and as much as I donāt like to admit it, defending my liberal values has suddenly become a conservative position.
So, if you think people should be able to say what they think without being punished for it; that people should be judged by their behavior, not their skin color; and that people should be able to live the way that they want to live, without government interference, then thereās not much left on the left for you.
Iāll keep trying to explain that to progressives until Iām totally left out.
Iām Dave Rubin of The Rubin Report
