And what does he mean by destroyed? Does he mean dead?
That's what I'm wondering too. I've never heard anyone use that term in such a context before.
It's a scare tactic. He's trying to put the fear of God in us.
But that's not how convincing someone something is true should work. You should be able to rationally be able to convince me your God exists without resorting to scare me with the fear of hell or that not believing will prevent you from going to heaven.
This tactic might work on them but not me. If you can't prove your God is real **** you and your fake ass God.
I would have been a fear factor champion because apparently fear is not a factor for me
It is amazing what becomes of a post when you lose it. Looks like this time it gained fear tactics. But no, the question is not moral or morality. The question is who if not God can give place to everything destroyed. It is also possible to argue that existence stops at the point of destruction. However in this case, does existence come out of nothing at the point of creation? And what is the point of creation if we assume no God?
What is our purpose? Maybe there is no purpose? What was the purpose of dinosaurs or the trilobites who ruled the planet before them? If we destroy ourselves and cockroaches rule the planet after we are gone, what is their purpose?
And when our solar system dies, what was the purpose?
And what about your great x 1000 grandparents?
I will be working a soup kitchen tomorrow. I'm making my life have purpose.
I don't really understand the purpose aspect of it. I think the loss aspect of it is more interesting. When someone kills you, you go off the grid. Based on your example, the visitors eating at the soup kitchen are one step before the next stage of drifting off the grid. I think the important part is that the drift accelerates more when we want to slow it down. So it does depend on us and it does have a deterministic pattern. Moreover we are not only at the receiving end of it but the very cause of it too. So the question remains valid, what/who runs the pattern?
I think some people have a difficult time with the fact that things happen randomly to random people. It is not a punishment from a god or gods. Good people, bad people, religious people, non-religious people. It really doesn't seem to matter. They have a hard time accepting that there may be no "higher purpose" and that perhaps nothing exists after death. I think fear of the unknown and the urge to try and explain things is another factor on why religion exists. Besides different gods and small differences in different religious beliefs throughout time, they all seem to be based on pretty much the same things. Man trying to explain things he doesn't understand and fears.
I think the problem is that all the religions and syfy stories don't eliminate the question, even if we decide that they are all wrong. This is not random, and keeps being a problem. Our process towards and through the destruction of neighbors and ourselves requires analysis, because it appears that that is what makes it bad both before and during the destruction. Some mystery, like a homework, where you get a real beating if not doing it.