OK, my bad, now please detail how you fold space?Why? Tourette's outburst on your part, here? Settle down.Then stop babbling about folding space
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
OK, my bad, now please detail how you fold space?Why? Tourette's outburst on your part, here? Settle down.Then stop babbling about folding space
I don't. I never have.OK, my bad, now please detail how you fold space?Why? Tourette's outburst on your part, here? Settle down.Then stop babbling about folding space
Never really explained, I think. Something about a matter anti-matter reaction within the warp core, that does something that makes the ship go really fast.I'm sure it is. I was kind of hoping for the detailed Trekkie explanation.I'm a huge Trekkie, to be honest. I'm however very much aware of the difference between fact and fiction. That doesn't mean it's not fun to watch.I was hoping for some Trekkie gold from him. I have never been much of a Trekkie.The first has a theoretical underpinning. The second is made up.What makes folding space different than dilithium crystal warp drive?Folding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
Impulse drive is achievable. Warp drive is fantasyNever really explained, I think. Something about a matter anti-matter reaction within the warp core, that does something that makes the ship go really fast.I'm sure it is. I was kind of hoping for the detailed Trekkie explanation.I'm a huge Trekkie, to be honest. I'm however very much aware of the difference between fact and fiction. That doesn't mean it's not fun to watch.I was hoping for some Trekkie gold from him. I have never been much of a Trekkie.The first has a theoretical underpinning. The second is made up.What makes folding space different than dilithium crystal warp drive?Folding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
Simon was a mathematician. So I'll ask these people. Early replica.Ask Simon how nothing creates DNA in pondsTo quote Piere-Simon Laplace when asked about the place of God in his description of the movement of planets.God Got here, so we shall get thereMaybe. If we can conquer the theoretical, technical, and engineering problems this will entail. Maybe we find a way we haven't even envisioned yet? It's just too hard to tell how. I'm pretty sure though that we will find a way.Folding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
“I Have No Need of that Hypothesis”
At the moment sure. Can you say with any certainty what will be achievable in another 100 years? 500? 1000?Impulse drive is achievable. Warp drive is fantasyNever really explained, I think. Something about a matter anti-matter reaction within the warp core, that does something that makes the ship go really fast.I'm sure it is. I was kind of hoping for the detailed Trekkie explanation.I'm a huge Trekkie, to be honest. I'm however very much aware of the difference between fact and fiction. That doesn't mean it's not fun to watch.I was hoping for some Trekkie gold from him. I have never been much of a Trekkie.The first has a theoretical underpinning. The second is made up.What makes folding space different than dilithium crystal warp drive?Folding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
And science says that nothing created everything, in violation of literally every scientific principleSimon was a mathematician. So I'll ask these people. Early replica.Ask Simon how nothing creates DNA in pondsTo quote Piere-Simon Laplace when asked about the place of God in his description of the movement of planets.God Got here, so we shall get thereMaybe. If we can conquer the theoretical, technical, and engineering problems this will entail. Maybe we find a way we haven't even envisioned yet? It's just too hard to tell how. I'm pretty sure though that we will find a way.Folding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
“I Have No Need of that Hypothesis”
If your argument is that science doesn't provide all the answers. I have to agree. On the other hand, science does make an honest attempt to find those answers.
The only thing God does is substituting "I don't know" with "I pretend to know". Only one of these things is a reliable path to finding actual answers.
Liar. Try to make your points without lies.And science says that nothing created everything
Rocky moons are where we will most likely end up if we do get off the earth for real. We can tunnel down deep enough to be protected from solar radiation and meteor bombardment and there will be minerals for building materials.Agreed. Much easier to control the climate in a space station than it is on a planet.If there are to be colonies off this planet, they will likely be space stations and not on planets. If we do use planets for mining or agriculture, most of the work will be robotic and the people will live on stations outside the atmosphere.
Just one possible problem there: moonquakes. These rocky moons ring like a bell after a moon quake. Maybe some are more suitable than others.Rocky moons are where we will most likely end up if we do get off the earth for real. We can tunnel down deep enough to be protected from solar radiation and meteor bombardment and there will be minerals for building materials.
Science says that the universe created itself from nothing.Liar. Try to make your points without lies.And science says that nothing created everything
That might be thousands of years in the futureFolding space seems like the way to go. Why travel to another star, when we can just bring it to us?Yes, I acknowledged that.There are no fusion enginesNuclear power can. So can fusion engines. First is possible with today's technologies. The second is feasible probably in our lifetime.Yes but Rocket fuel will never get you farYes you need 5 miles per second to get to low orbitDo you know how many TONS of propellant it takes to get a 150 pound person even into low earth or it, let alone take him to the nearest star in 70,000 years?????why do you have trouble accepting that space exploration might be a solution for that?
It takes a shitload to get a person into low orbit. Once in actual outer space, all it takes is the amount to get up to speed, and then minor amounts to make course corrections and avoid obstacles.
Rocket fuel is extremely ineffective
If the space craft is built at a space station, the need to get into low orbit and still be safe for the frail human body, will not be as big a factor.
Nope, we need huge ships 100 to 1000 or more times the size of a container ship. No need to go unusually fast as the occupants are now space dwellers that will adapt to space over hundreds or thousands of generations on the way to a new home.The key of space exploration is only through nanotechnology and AI that is very smart .
Humans are not design to travel the stars .
It will be done by nano ships that can create self replicating nano machines , build mini bases and cities , mine resources and most importantly can carry human DNA to manufacture humans in AI labs
I don`t think so. It seems to me that it`s too early to talk about that. Despite those things that Musk claims that humans will be able to step on the surface of Mars in 2024. It`s too early, our technology is too weakNo will
USA has the technology to try to land humans on Mars
Musk can not land his toy on Earth dependablyI don`t think so. It seems to me that it`s too early to talk about that. Despite those things that Musk claims that humans will be able to step on the surface of Mars in 2024. It`s too early, our technology is too weakNo will
USA has the technology to try to land humans on Mars
Lie.Science says that the universe created itself from nothing.
Again science says that the universe just happened from nothing. Your denial is leading you to GodLie.Science says that the universe created itself from nothing.