Why don't people want to know the truth about 9/11?

[eots]

The exterior columns on the south wall bowed inward as they were subjected to high temperatures, pull-in forces from the floors beginning at 80 min, and additional gravity loads redistributed from the core. Figure 5–6 shows the observed and the estimated inward bowing of the south wall at 97 min after impact (10:23 a.m.). Since no bowing was observed on the south wall at 69 min (9:55 a.m.), as shown in Table 5–2, it is estimated that the south wall began to bow inward at around 80 min when the floors on the south side began to substantially sag. The inward bowing of the south wall increased with time due to continuing floor sagging and increased temperatures on the south wall as shown in Figs. 4–42 and 5–7. At 97 min (10:23 a.m.), the maximum bowing observed was about 55 in. (see Fig. 5–6).

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR 1-6D.pdf


Notice how none of the truthers care to explain this? Just change the subject....

it was hit by a plane so damage to the facade is not a big surprise...this does not explain the collapse witnessed and the NIST observations are very questionable

Wrong answer, see the highlighted area? That's 80 minutes after the plane hit before the buckling began. Care to try again?

so what ? are you trying to say it would of occurred if the plane had not hit the building ? or it was not caused by damage caused from the impact

 

[eots]

The exterior columns on the south wall bowed inward as they were subjected to high temperatures, pull-in forces from the floors beginning at 80 min, and additional gravity loads redistributed from the core. Figure 5–6 shows the observed and the estimated inward bowing of the south wall at 97 min after impact (10:23 a.m.). Since no bowing was observed on the south wall at 69 min (9:55 a.m.), as shown in Table 5–2, it is estimated that the south wall began to bow inward at around 80 min when the floors on the south side began to substantially sag. The inward bowing of the south wall increased with time due to continuing floor sagging and increased temperatures on the south wall as shown in Figs. 4–42 and 5–7. At 97 min (10:23 a.m.), the maximum bowing observed was about 55 in. (see Fig. 5–6).

http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR 1-6D.pdf


Notice how none of the truthers care to explain this? Just change the subject....

it was hit by a plane so damage to the facade is not a big surprise...this does not explain the collapse witnessed and the NIST observations are very questionable

except that is NOT at the entry point
so you dont know what the fuck you are talking about

wow, big shocker there
its not like you have ever shown you know what you are talking about, on ANY subject

slightly below really changes nothing

 

[DiveCon]

it was hit by a plane so damage to the facade is not a big surprise...this does not explain the collapse witnessed and the NIST observations are very questionable

except that is NOT at the entry point
so you dont know what the fuck you are talking about

wow, big shocker there
its not like you have ever shown you know what you are talking about, on ANY subject

slightly below really changes nothing

its on the OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING, numbnutz

 

[eots]

except that is NOT at the entry point
so you dont know what the fuck you are talking about

wow, big shocker there
its not like you have ever shown you know what you are talking about, on ANY subject

slightly below really changes nothing

its on the OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING, numbnutz

but the plane penetrated through the building exploding out the other side moron

 

[DiveCon]

slightly below really changes nothing

its on the OTHER SIDE OF THE BUILDING, numbnutz

but the plane penetrated through the building exploding out the other side moron

no shit idiot
but the damage was MINOR on that side
and, the place it was bending was ABOVE the exit point
not below

 

[eots]

 

[SFC Ollie]

So to sum it up, the truthers have zero explanations for this inward bowing of the buildings.

And since they have nothing the NIST must then be considered the only source for the truth on this matter.

Thanks.

 

[PhysicsExist]

So to sum it up, the truthers have zero explanations for this inward bowing of the buildings.

And since they have nothing the NIST must then be considered the only source for the truth on this matter.

Thanks.

You have disgraced your country by breaking your Oath.

As officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force. Therefore it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us. We owe this to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and we owe it to those who are following that same oath today in Iraq and Afghanistan. We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed. It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes. It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.

We join with other organizations of professionals, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, and Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and millions of individual citizens in demanding a thorough, impartial, open and transparent reinvestigation of the terrorist acts of 9/11.

www.MilitaryOfficersfor911truth.org

 

[DiveCon]

and again, PE cant answer a question

 

[Rat in the Hat]

and again, PE cant answer a question

Evasion is his middle name.



p.s. STOP THE BROWN DWARF...BUY SILVER!!!!!!!

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Hey, will someone please answer the first question in the search tags?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Jesse Ventura's audio expert, Kent Gibson, admits that Ventura edited his interview. And that voice morphing can't be done without huge samples from the subjects.




Oh, snap.

 

[candycorn]

Jesse Ventura's audio expert, Kent Gibson, admits that Ventura edited his interview. And that voice morphing can't be done without huge samples from the subjects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujumL1d_L5E


Oh, snap.

I guess all that remains to be seen is if Ventura is a CIA plant or a Mossaad Plant. Care to weigh in ID-EOTS?

 

[PhysicsExist]

So to sum it up, the truthers have zero explanations for this inward bowing of the buildings.

And since they have nothing the NIST must then be considered the only source for the truth on this matter.

Thanks.

You have disgraced your country by breaking your Oath.

As officers in the U.S. military, we took an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Regardless of our current status -- active duty, reserves, retired, or civilian -- that oath remains in force. Therefore it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, how much we have to suffer, or where it leads us. We owe this to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and we owe it to those who are following that same oath today in Iraq and Afghanistan. We believe the official account of 9/11 as defined in the 9/11 Commission Report is grossly inaccurate and fatally flawed. It is imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that those responsible can be identified and brought to justice in order that they and similarly-minded people never again commit such heinous crimes. It is also imperative that we have an accurate understanding of 9/11 so that governmental policies resulting from 9/11 are based on truth rather than deception.

We join with other organizations of professionals, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, and Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and millions of individual citizens in demanding a thorough, impartial, open and transparent reinvestigation of the terrorist acts of 9/11.

Military Officers for 9/11 Truth

Bypassing spam

 

[DiveCon]

Bypassing spam

dfipshit, YOU are the spam

 

[eots]

IF,,there was bowing.. not in any way prove the nist collapse theory is correct or they cause was properly determined

 

[Rat in the Hat]

He's bypassing himself now????

Must be a Santa Barbara thing.

 

[eots]

Jesse Ventura's audio expert, Kent Gibson, admits that Ventura edited his interview. And that voice morphing can't be done without huge samples from the subjects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujumL1d_L5E


Oh, snap.

this video debunks nothing

 

[eots]

clearly the technology exist..if it was used is speculation and opinion.I do not have a strong opinion on phone calls ...the collapse of the towers and wtc 7 ,the failure if NIST to determine the cause and ensuing cover-up is the issue as far as I am concerned

 

[candycorn]

Jesse Ventura's audio expert, Kent Gibson, admits that Ventura edited his interview. And that voice morphing can't be done without huge samples from the subjects.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujumL1d_L5E


Oh, snap.

this video debunks nothing

If by "nothing" you mean every thing; you may be on to something greaseball.