Why Does the Right Hate Obama?

[Gunny]

what has obama done that shows signs of succeeding....

Well, he liked Bush's wiretapping policy so much he succeeded in keeping THAT.

Yep, i saw the big story on every major network regarding this, the outrage on the left has been massive.........

I saw that Chuck Norris movie! Silent Outrage ...

 

[driveby]

Well, he liked Bush's wiretapping policy so much he succeeded in keeping THAT.

Yep, i saw the big story on every major network regarding this, the outrage on the left has been massive.........

I saw that Chuck Norris movie! Silent Outrage ...

 

[elvis]

LOL. The wingnuts are scared out of their little panties because President Barak Hussein Obama shows signs of succeeding. Succeeding where the wingnuts poster child for idiocy failed.

Hey dickhead, lovers don't like it when you misspell their name.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Well, let's see. Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American soil at the beginning of his watch.

ROFLMNAO!

So "Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American SOIL?

Well that's all I need to dismiss this crank...

DISSSssssssssMISSED!

Now FTR: that is the logical equivilent of "PRESIDENT HUSSEIN HAD A US CARGO SHIP HIJACKED!"

I doubt there's anyone on this planet that opposses The Lord of the Idiots more than I and I can tell you that there's absolutely NO EVIDENCE that King Hussein had the Hearsk Hijacked/Pirated... easy peasy... a sound intellectual conclusion based upon the available evidence and the potential for reason stemming from that evidence.

Now for the lowly leftist, they lack the means to reason... thus they come to UNSOUND Conclusions, from myth and evidence born on ethereal fabrications... they're idiots.

 

[Old Rocks]

Well, let's see. Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American soil at the beginning of his watch.

ROFLMNAO!

So "Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American SOIL?

Well that's all I need to dismiss this crank...

DISSSssssssssMISSED!

Now FTR: that is the logical equivilent of "PRESIDENT HUSSEIN HAD A US CARGO SHIP HIJACKED!"

I doubt there's anyone on this planet that opposses The Lord of the Idiots more than I and I can tell you that there's absolutely NO EVIDENCE that King Hussein had the Hearsk Hijacked/Pirated... easy peasy... a sound intellectual conclusion based upon the available evidence and the potential for reason stemming from that evidence.

Now for the lowly leftist, they lack the means to reason... thus they come to UNSOUND Conclusions, from myth and evidence born on ethereal fabrications... they're idiots.

Idiot. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. He failed to get the mastermind of the murder because he was to busy lying us into a war with Iraq.

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL. The wingnuts are scared out of their little panties because President Barak Hussein Obama shows signs of succeeding. Succeeding where the wingnuts poster child for idiocy failed.

Nice baseless attack for a response. Did you miss the part where only you kool aid drinkers think his policies are succeeding?

I've been thinking YOU are the wingnut poster child for idiocy.

Gunny, old boy, you will be so disapointed if President Obama is a resounding success.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

It is more about power and the loss of control. There is this sense in the right that they know better, it is part of the hierarchical ideological frame they operate in. Clinton faced the same 'hate' - call it what you will - and was hounded till a private incident gave the conservatives their high moral (?) ground. Ask which party wants to control your actions and you get a sense of why conservatism is so lost after a democratic majority told them go away.

Well, the simple fact is that we actually do 'know better.' It's a function of our means to reason and your stark lack of that simple means.

And it's not ideologically heirarchial... it's the natural order... And yes, Americans tended towards a visceral, intense dislike For Bubba; often in ways that evoked feelings of anger, hostility, or animosity... but there was innumerable intellectually sound, logically valid, well reasoned... reasons. This in contrast to the irrational unsound, ethereal, logically invalid poorly reasoned visceral, intense dislike the left has to dislike GW Bush... who was more LIKE THEM than he was like US.

 

[alan1]

Now, I'm not an Obama lover. I voted for him, but that's because I voted against McCain-Palin. Obama was, for me, just the lesser of two evils. But I'm curious. People whose political perspective falls more to the Conservative side of the political spectrum really hate Obama. I'm a little confused about this because the man hasn't even been in office long enough for his policy changes to have any real results. The Right is screaming about his budget, but I think back to Bush II and see that he did A LOT of spending too. Why wasn't the Right screaming then?

Some people are 100%, fanatically certain that his policies will fail and even want them to (Why? I don't know. What kind of national pride is that? If he can jump start the economy - and I'm not saying he will - but if he does, then what will those who want him to fail think then?). You can espouse your fiscally conservative policies all you want, but Japan did the same thing in the 1990's that Obama is doing now and it "worked". You might hate his policies, but they haven't even had a chance to make an impact yet. I've heard people angry over the bail-outs as though Obama is the originator of the bail-outs. Its like they forgot that Bush II ended his term bailing out the banks and Wallstreet.

He hasn't started any wars. He's getting us out of an unpopular invasion of a sovereign nation which became a political quagmire for the Bush Administration. He's attempting to fix the problems that Bush II's policies encountered either by tweaking the policies or scrapping them and starting over (using research-based evidence). He's a Christian but is constantly called a Muslim by rightwing extremists. He's not a socialist despite what rightwing extremists might think. For liberals Obama isn't even very liberal, he's way more Moderate or middle of the road, but Conservatives cry communist and socialist every time he talks about health care (which, according to his plan, isn't even socialist - it isn't free for all citizens).

I wonder if it has to do with partisanship, with political propaganda, with team spirit-rivalry, with Obama's race, and with social pressures (i.e. Obama is so popular with the media and has become an icon of popular culture here and around the world that I wonder if some people are just reacting to it negatively - which I can understand to a ceratin degree).

Anyway, for those who hate the new POTUS, here's thread for you to let the left know why.

So, you admit you voted for something you think is evil.
Aren't you just brilliant?

 

[Sinatra]

Obama has proven to be the most divisive president ever, bar none. He's also sent us on a path of third world economy. Clap that, all you who wish the US ill.

So you say. We will see what the next four years bring. It certainly is nice to have a President that can actually put an intelligent sentence together.

He reads well, yes - but he does not appear particularly well read...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MyW9e5QdWxk]YouTube - The Obama Stutter[/ame]

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Well, let's see. Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American soil at the beginning of his watch.

ROFLMNAO!

So "Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American SOIL?

Well that's all I need to dismiss this crank...

DISSSssssssssMISSED!

Now FTR: that is the logical equivilent of "PRESIDENT HUSSEIN HAD A US CARGO SHIP HIJACKED!"

I doubt there's anyone on this planet that opposses The Lord of the Idiots more than I and I can tell you that there's absolutely NO EVIDENCE that King Hussein had the Hearsk Hijacked/Pirated... easy peasy... a sound intellectual conclusion based upon the available evidence and the potential for reason stemming from that evidence.

Now for the lowly leftist, they lack the means to reason... thus they come to UNSOUND Conclusions, from myth and evidence born on ethereal fabrications... they're idiots.

Idiot. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. He failed to get the mastermind of the murder because he was to busy lying us into a war with Iraq.

Uh oh... So 9-11 happened on Bush's watch?

Well using that species of reasoning then, we can conclude that the Financial meltdown is happening on the Lord of the Idiots watch...

Ya sure ya want to go there? I mean that works for me... I can beat you sensless with this one as well as the alternative... so pick the implement of your destruction.

Now the question has long been asked... "How could Bush FAIL to capture Bin Ladin?"

Now watch this Einstien... because this is TRICKY!....

How could Bush FAIL to capture Bin Ladin?

ANSWER: HE'S BEEN HIDING!

 

[Meister]

Well, let's see. Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American soil at the beginning of his watch.

ROFLMNAO!

So "Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American SOIL?

Well that's all I need to dismiss this crank...

DISSSssssssssMISSED!

Now FTR: that is the logical equivilent of "PRESIDENT HUSSEIN HAD A US CARGO SHIP HIJACKED!"

I doubt there's anyone on this planet that opposses The Lord of the Idiots more than I and I can tell you that there's absolutely NO EVIDENCE that King Hussein had the Hearsk Hijacked/Pirated... easy peasy... a sound intellectual conclusion based upon the available evidence and the potential for reason stemming from that evidence.

Now for the lowly leftist, they lack the means to reason... thus they come to UNSOUND Conclusions, from myth and evidence born on ethereal fabrications... they're idiots.

Idiot. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. He failed to get the mastermind of the murder because he was to busy lying us into a war with Iraq.

idiot child....Why didn't your buddy Clinton take control of Bin Laden when Bin Laden was offered up from Sudan on at least two occasions??? Your credibility sucks Old Rocks.

 

[Dr Grump]

Well using that species of reasoning then, we can conclude that the Financial meltdown is happening on the Lord of the Idiots watch...

Er, no. The meltdown started in 2007, your boy's watch...;O)

 

[Phate]

ROFLMNAO!

So "Bush had 3000 Americans murdered on American SOIL?

Well that's all I need to dismiss this crank...

DISSSssssssssMISSED!

Now FTR: that is the logical equivilent of "PRESIDENT HUSSEIN HAD A US CARGO SHIP HIJACKED!"

I doubt there's anyone on this planet that opposses The Lord of the Idiots more than I and I can tell you that there's absolutely NO EVIDENCE that King Hussein had the Hearsk Hijacked/Pirated... easy peasy... a sound intellectual conclusion based upon the available evidence and the potential for reason stemming from that evidence.

Now for the lowly leftist, they lack the means to reason... thus they come to UNSOUND Conclusions, from myth and evidence born on ethereal fabrications... they're idiots.

Idiot. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. He failed to get the mastermind of the murder because he was to busy lying us into a war with Iraq.

idiot child....Why didn't your buddy Clinton take control of Bin Laden when Bin Laden was offered up from Sudan on at least two occasions??? Your credibility sucks Old Rocks.

Just wanted to say both Clinton and Bush had the opportunity to kill Osama. I was reading through some declassified CIA files in a book, and don't remember the exact details, but Bush had the exact location of Bin laden within 15 feet. The Directory of the CIA asked for the green light to take him out, Bush didn't give it. This was pre-9/11

 

[Annie]

Once again the dance around issues. Sinatra ignored by the liberals. No surprise there. More of the same.

It was so much easier for them to spew venom toward Bush. Now they got their guy and he is a disaster and they know it.

 

[Meister]

Well using that species of reasoning then, we can conclude that the Financial meltdown is happening on the Lord of the Idiots watch...

Er, no. The meltdown started in 2007, your boy's watch...;O)

Er, 9-11 was being hatched under Clinton's watch, Clinton did have opportunities to nail Bin Laden, and chose not to. Clinton said that Bin Laden was a "hot potato" and didn't want to touch it. Bin Laden was behind the first WTC bombing. Clinton had fragmented the FBI, and the CIA intelligence to the point that they couldn't connect the dots.

 

[Yurt]

Well using that species of reasoning then, we can conclude that the Financial meltdown is happening on the Lord of the Idiots watch...

Er, no. The meltdown started in 2007, your boy's watch...;O)

it really is nonsensical to blame everything economical on any one president or even the current president. so much more than just the president has their hands in the cookie jar and so many other things affect the economy. but i know libs love to hate bush and will not blame any democrat, nope, only that idiot gwb who is so powerful he alone controls the us economy....

 

[Sinatra]

Once again the dance around issues. Sinatra ignored by the liberals. No surprise there. More of the same.

It was so much easier for them to spew venom toward Bush. Now they got their guy and he is a disaster and they know it.

Take heart!

The good fight has plenty of fight left!!

 

[Harry Dresden]

It is more about power and the loss of control. There is this sense in the right that they know better, it is part of the hierarchical ideological frame they operate in. Clinton faced the same 'hate' - call it what you will - and was hounded till a private incident gave the conservatives their high moral (?) ground. Ask which party wants to control your actions and you get a sense of why conservatism is so lost after a democratic majority told them go away.

and you dont think the dems think they know whats best for you?.....jesus christ dipshit...you ever heard of Nancy Pelosi?......

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Well using that species of reasoning then, we can conclude that the Financial meltdown is happening on the Lord of the Idiots watch...

Er, no. The meltdown started in 2007, your boy's watch...;O)

Did it? Are ya sure?

Sorta like how the Islamic terrorism went to war with the US in 1993 and the Clinton regime treated it as a function of criminality, establishing walls of separation between law enforcement and intelligence, prohibiting profiling of Islamic males and eviscerating Intelligence and Military budgets...


ROFLMNAO...

Now I’ve posted this 501 times, so once more is no big deal...

The current financial crisis is a direct result of the abuse of power by the Leftists in the legislature; it began nearly a century ago and slowly crept deeper into the US Markets, but was accelerated exponentially in the 1990s when the "Progressives" in the legislature, threatened the US mortgage industry with Civil Rights lawsuits if they did not underwrite mortgages in red-line districts... thus manipulating and undermining the reasonable and time tested actuarial thresholds of mortgage lending...

Of course, the Financial industry SHOULD have told the leftist to shove it, and in so doing forced those civil right lawsuits and exposed the leftists as the rancid fools that they always have been; but instead they assented to the coercive abuse of power and public trust all of which lead to pseudo-guarantees through Fanny wherein it was determined that if the Lenders wrote the deals, Fanny would take their shady paper; leaving the lenders held presumably harmless.

The problem is of course, that even the US Federal government and it's Leftist, er... "Progressive" means to print money, can't guarantee THAT volume of liability... just as the Federal government can't actually guarantee Deposits by the whole of it's citizenry, which they've now doubled-down on... all they can do is to SAY that they can guarantee those deposits... which puts the fear of those depositors, that 'their money is at risk of evaporating' at ease...

And THAT is the BIG LIE; and THAT is why the 'Progressives' have had to spend two TRILLION DOLLARS... to avoid runs from panicky depositors which would once again PROVE that the Progressive house of cards is unsustainable; which would force the Federal government to fold after it is forced to print MANY, MANY MORE TRILLIONS in cash to pay those depositors...

It's Progressive "Fractional Banking" sis and it's a SCAM.

Bernie Madoff is an ANGEL; a veritable economic SAINT compared to the scam that leftism has pulled and continues to pull on the international economy and the hard working people of the entire world...

Credits and debits... based upon nothing, except the means of the US Taxpayer to PAY TAXES... which are paid using the same credits and debits which are based upon the same nothing.

The scam was never sustainable, but the superior production of a free market and the prudent and virtuous nature of the American people, acted as a regulating, moderating influence which prolonged what would have otherwise collapsed decades ago.

Where the Left hijacked the actuarial thresholds to advance it's warped and wholly erroneous sense of fairness, it precluded the means of market to regulate itself... due to lowering the means by which these highly coveted instruments were obtained, it induced a frenzy of mortgage buying which lead to exponential increases in the cost of the real estate which secures those mortgages...

Sadly, once the actuarial thresholds were lowered, the runaway Mortgage Genie was out of the bottle... the same 'irrational exuberance' which drove the tech bubble/burst, drove the price of secured real estate beyond the means of the market to sustain it and PRESTO... the market failed to sustain sales; values plummeted... and the fraction of liquidity which the industry is required to have on hand against it's liabilities was once again exposed as being grossly insufficient and TRILLIONS WERE NEEDED TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM REALIZING THAT THE ENTIRE "PROGRESSIVE" ECONOMY IS A SCAM.

So, with all that said, one may be tempted to run and decry “GREED CAUSED IT ALL”… but that human beings are, by their nature, GREEDY is not news… humanity is saddled with numerous frailties… so PERHAPS it’s a BAD IDEA to advance POLICY WHICH SETS ASIDE SOUND PRINCIPLE… PERHAPS… it’s a BAD IDEA to advance ideas which PREY ON THOSE FRAILTIES… just perhaps it’s a BAD idea to lend credence to those who suggests that actuarial thresholds should be lowered to accommodate ideological goals which rest upon invalid reasoning and exists wholly outside of sound principle.

Need anything else Sis?

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Idiot. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch. He failed to get the mastermind of the murder because he was to busy lying us into a war with Iraq.

idiot child....Why didn't your buddy Clinton take control of Bin Laden when Bin Laden was offered up from Sudan on at least two occasions??? Your credibility sucks Old Rocks.

Just wanted to say both Clinton and Bush had the opportunity to kill Osama. I was reading through some declassified CIA files in a book, and don't remember the exact details, but Bush had the exact location of Bin laden within 15 feet. The Directory of the CIA asked for the green light to take him out, Bush didn't give it. This was pre-9/11

Did he?

Well, I'm gonna have to raise the "BULLSHIT" flag on this one...

If you can source the info... and it checks out, I'm prepared to revise my assessment; but it doesn't fit on many angles.