Why Does the Left Say "Prophet" Mohammed?

[Weatherman2020]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

 

[Pogo]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

 

[Weatherman2020]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

Jesus Son of God is very common. Find that in the NY Times. Maybe on their story of Jesus in a bowl of urine and calling it art.

 

[whitehall]

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

 

[Londoner]

Fail.

Bush and the party of big oil have always been tighter with the Muslims than the Left (by an extremely wide margin). Bush was very tight with the Saudis, the most extreme Islamist state in the world.

 

[S.J.]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.

The president says it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

It's a term of respect. And subservient behavior.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

Media outlets typically take religious and cultural forms from the actual religion or culture. They also refer to the head of state of Great Britain as "Prime Minister David Cameron", even though we have no such office here, because that's the correct form of address for that country and culture. As I pointed out earlier, they also frequently refer to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not His surname. This is because Christianity addresses Him that way.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Fail.

Bush and the party of big oil have always been tighter with the Muslims than the Left (by an extremely wide margin). Bush wasvery tight with the Saudis, the most extreme Islamist state in the world.

Imam Obama can call Mo a prophet, that I can understand.

 

[Arianrhod]

It's a term of respect. And subservient behavior.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

What's interesting is how you and most others on the right lie with such ease – you likely don't even know you're lying, or don't care.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

Media outlets typically take religious and cultural forms from the actual religion or culture. They also refer to the head of state of Great Britain as "Prime Minister David Cameron", even though we have no such office here, because that's the correct form of address for that country and culture. As I pointed out earlier, they also frequently refer to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not His surname. This is because Christianity addresses Him that way.

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

 

[Weatherman2020]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

What's interesting is how you and most others on the right lie with such ease – you likely don't even know you're lying, or don't care.

Your prophet pleased with your brown nose?

 

[mdk]

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

TLC aired a reality show named All-American Muslims several years ago. Zero 'Hollywood execs' were harmed and the show was cancelled after one season b/c nobody watched it. lol

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's a term of respect. And subservient behavior.

Nice photoshop. Your prophet must be proud of your lies.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

Jesus Son of God is very common. Find that in the NY Times. Maybe on their story of Jesus in a bowl of urine and calling it art.

Christianity also says Jesus is the Messiah, but the point is that neither is the title that's routinely appended to His name in conversation, the way "Christ" is, or the way "Queen" is routinely appended to "Elizabeth the II", or "President" is to "Barack Obama". By your logic, the NY Times should also be referring to the President as "Commander-in-Chief Barack Obama", but it doesn't, because that's not the title he's most often addressed by. "President" is.

If the NY Times did a story specifically about WHY Jesus is important to Christians, then they would make reference to the fact that He's believed to be the Messiah and the Son of God, just as when it does a story on Obama sending troops somewhere or discussing military operations with Congress or something, it makes reference to the fact that he's Commander in Chief of the military.

Titles are appended to names in the media according to the way they're appended in the source material, in this case, the Muslim culture.

 

[CremeBrulee]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

Media outlets typically take religious and cultural forms from the actual religion or culture. They also refer to the head of state of Great Britain as "Prime Minister David Cameron", even though we have no such office here, because that's the correct form of address for that country and culture. As I pointed out earlier, they also frequently refer to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not His surname. This is because Christianity addresses Him that way.

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

 

[Arianrhod]

It's a term of respect. And subservient behavior.

Nice photoshop.