Why Does the Left Say "Prophet" Mohammed?

[tinydancer]

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Ohhh. Now it's an op-ed. So it doesn't count. The Times must have been ahead of the curve if they didn't use those words in the 19th century. Isn't that their new slogan: Islam friendly since 1851. Too funny guy.

Christ is a biggie. He's the guy.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Ohhh. Now it's an op-ed. So it doesn't count. The Times must have been ahead of the curve if they didn't use those words in the 19th century. Isn't that their new slogan: Islam friendly since 1851. Too funny guy.

JERUSALEM, Jan. 8— A judge sentenced an Israeli woman to two years in prison today for putting up posters depicting the Prophet Mohammed as a pig.

World News Briefs; Israel Sentences Woman For Anti-Muslim Posters

That's a news story. Where's the news story that says Jesus the Messiah?

 

[Pogo]

Media outlets typically take religious and cultural forms from the actual religion or culture. They also refer to the head of state of Great Britain as "Prime Minister David Cameron", even though we have no such office here, because that's the correct form of address for that country and culture. As I pointed out earlier, they also frequently refer to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not His surname. This is because Christianity addresses Him that way.

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Can't tell that that IS a news story? No wonder you make shit up.
"Op-Ed Columnist" is a title. In his case a job description. Doesn't mean it's the only thing he can do.

Here's another one.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Can't tell that that IS a news story? No wonder you make shit up.

Opinion articles are news stories? Pull your head out of your ass.

 

[Weatherman2020]

150 years and the Islamoapologists can't find one news story in the NY Times that says Jesus Christ.

 

[Pogo]

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Can't tell that that IS a news story? No wonder you make shit up.

Opinion articles are news stories? Pull your head out of your ass.

It isn't an "opinion article" dumbass. What's it rendering an "opinion" on?

 

[Pogo]

150 years and the Islamoapologists can't find one news story in the NY Times that says Jesus Christ.

Hate to break this to ya but Jesus is dead. News is about the living.

 

[Montrovant]

150 years and the Islamoapologists can't find one news story in the NY Times that says Jesus Christ.

When did the NY Times become the only left wing media? You didn't start this thread based on the NY Times using the Prophet Mohammed, you said the left and left wing media do, then you decided that means the NY Times for some reason.

Of course, you also reject an article which uses Jesus Christ in the title, declare Prophet is not a title, and basically seem to ignore every point made which might contradict your narrative, so......

 

[Cecilie1200]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

Jesus Son of God is very common. Find that in the NY Times. Maybe on their story of Jesus in a bowl of urine and calling it art.

Or just throw in The Lamb to shake things up a little?

They're not interested in "shaking things up a little", at least not in that regard. Media style books exist to provide continuity and clarity.

Noticeably, they also always refer to the head of the Roman Catholic Church as "Pope Francis". Pope is a title, and his birth name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio. "Francis" is his reign name, chosen when he became Pope, but I guarantee you that you'll never see a media article addressing him as Jorge Bergoglio.

Is the media now owned by Catholics, too?

Learn what an office title is versus what a prophet is, geesh.

I know what a prophet is, thanks. Islam actually recognizes quite a few prophets, but it has only one Prophet.

It's impossible to draw a complete analogy, because the two religious cultures are completely different. Catholics don't really have an ultimate human head of their religion for all time, nor do they attach the same veneration to any human being, even the Pope, that Muslims do to Muhammed. Because the religious culture is different, the addresses are different, too.

Nevertheless, the point still stands. Catholics specify a certain manner of address for the head of their church, and the media accepts it. Muslims specify a certain manner of address for the founder of their religion, and the media complies. Doesn't matter what you do or don't think a prophet is: that's still his title.

Not even sure why you're getting your panties in such a ruffle about this. What difference does it make? It might get you your jollies if the media was gratuitously insulting to Muslims, but it frankly wouldn't accomplish anything useful from a journalistic standpoint.

Would it make you feel better to know that the NY Times regularly refers to "the Apostle Paul" and "Paul the Apostle", rather than simply "Paul", when referring to the New Testament figure?

 

[Cecilie1200]

It's a term of respect and it makes sense. The interesting problem for the Hollywood left is that they are free to promote reality shows about Christian values and even dishonest shows about alleged Amish life but in today's political environment there will never be a Hollywood sponsored show about American Muslem beliefs if Hollywood execs value their lives.

It's a term of respect. And subservient behavior.

It's a title, so yeah, it's a term of respect. Most titles are.

In this case, it also differentiates THE Mohammed from the gazillion OTHER Mohammeds running around out there, because my God, every third Muslim man on the planet seems to be named Mohammed.

Prophet is not a title.

It is when referring to Muhammed.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nope. Not once has the NY Times said Christ in a news story since 1851.

NYTimes.com Search

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Can't tell that that IS a news story? No wonder you make shit up.
"Op-Ed Columnist" is a title. In his case a job description. Doesn't mean it's the only thing he can do.

Here's another one.

Shitforbrains thinks "United Church for Christ" is the NY Times saying Jesus The Christ. Too friggen funny.

 

[Cecilie1200]

You see it over and over in the Left Wing Media. Do they ever say Messiah Jesus or Prophet Moses? Nope. Islam owns the left.

http://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2...he-prophet-muhammad-that-some-deem-offensive/

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/10/n...new-york-courthouse-taken-down-years-ago.html

Charlie Hebdo terror attack: Tough decisions for news outlets

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

Jesus Son of God is very common. Find that in the NY Times. Maybe on their story of Jesus in a bowl of urine and calling it art.

Or just throw in The Lamb to shake things up a little?

They're not interested in "shaking things up a little", at least not in that regard. Media style books exist to provide continuity and clarity.

Noticeably, they also always refer to the head of the Roman Catholic Church as "Pope Francis". Pope is a title, and his birth name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio. "Francis" is his reign name, chosen when he became Pope, but I guarantee you that you'll never see a media article addressing him as Jorge Bergoglio.

Is the media now owned by Catholics, too?

We'll know when our media's lost it when they add that disclaimer acronym whenever they refer to mohammed.

I'll be worried when they insist on following every reference to Muhammed with "blessings be upon him".

 

[mdk]

Dutch firebrand vows to show cartoons of Prophet Muhammad on TV

Powers: Muhammad Drawing Event Outside AZ Mosque Is 'Misguided, Hateful'

Islam own Fox News or something.

 

[Weatherman2020]

One assumes because the religions themselves don't refer to Jesus or Moses that way, but Islam DOES refer to Mohammed as "the Prophet Mohammed" or just "the Prophet" all the time.

I should point out that the media regularly refers to Jesus as "Jesus Christ", even though "Christ" is a title, not a surname. I'd say that partially because Christianity refers to Him that way, and partially because they don't realize it's not a surname.

Jesus Son of God is very common. Find that in the NY Times. Maybe on their story of Jesus in a bowl of urine and calling it art.

Or just throw in The Lamb to shake things up a little?

They're not interested in "shaking things up a little", at least not in that regard. Media style books exist to provide continuity and clarity.

Noticeably, they also always refer to the head of the Roman Catholic Church as "Pope Francis". Pope is a title, and his birth name is Jorge Mario Bergoglio. "Francis" is his reign name, chosen when he became Pope, but I guarantee you that you'll never see a media article addressing him as Jorge Bergoglio.

Is the media now owned by Catholics, too?

Learn what an office title is versus what a prophet is, geesh.

I know what a prophet is, thanks. Islam actually recognizes quite a few prophets, but it has only one Prophet.

It's impossible to draw a complete analogy, because the two religious cultures are completely different. Catholics don't really have an ultimate human head of their religion for all time, nor do they attach the same veneration to any human being, even the Pope, that Muslims do to Muhammed. Because the religious culture is different, the addresses are different, too.

Nevertheless, the point still stands. Catholics specify a certain manner of address for the head of their church, and the media accepts it. Muslims specify a certain manner of address for the founder of their religion, and the media complies. Doesn't matter what you do or don't think a prophet is: that's still his title.

Not even sure why you're getting your panties in such a ruffle about this. What difference does it make? It might get you your jollies if the media was gratuitously insulting to Muslims, but it frankly wouldn't accomplish anything useful from a journalistic standpoint.

Would it make you feel better to know that the NY Times regularly refers to "the Apostle Paul" and "Paul the Apostle", rather than simply "Paul", when referring to the New Testament figure?

Dance. Where's that news story saying Jesus the Christ?

 

[Weatherman2020]

150 years and the Islamoapologists can't find one news story in the NY Times that says Jesus Christ.

When did the NY Times become the only left wing media? You didn't start this thread based on the NY Times using the Prophet Mohammed, you said the left and left wing media do, then you decided that means the NY Times for some reason.

Of course, you also reject an article which uses Jesus Christ in the title, declare Prophet is not a title, and basically seem to ignore every point made which might contradict your narrative, so......

Anyone can find opinion articles that says anything.
Hundreds of Prophet Mo's in news stories.
Where's one Jesus Christ?

 

[Weatherman2020]

150 years and the Islamoapologists can't find one news story in the NY Times that says Jesus Christ.

Hate to break this to ya but Jesus is dead. News is about the living.

As you defend your pedophile Mo.

 

[Cecilie1200]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

Jesus is the prophet by the way.

Um, can't say I've ever heard of a Christian church referring to Him as "prophet", per se. I mean, obviously, He did hand down prophecies, but it's not like He was a human getting messages from God. He WAS God, from the Christian perspective.

 

[Pogo]

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Can't tell that that IS a news story? No wonder you make shit up.
"Op-Ed Columnist" is a title. In his case a job description. Doesn't mean it's the only thing he can do.

Here's another one.

Shitforbrains thinks "United Church for Christ" is the NY Times saying Jesus The Christ. Too friggen funny.

When did you revise the definite article into it?

You said there were no NYT metions of "Christ", you were proved wrong. Wallow in the wrongitude of your wrongness. You've got more wrongs than a ladder.

 

[Cecilie1200]

That's what happens when you don't know how to search properly.

This is a political discussion? Mkay...

Yes, the lefts heads up the ass of Islam is a political discussion.

You do a search and show us the NY Times news story that says Jesus Christ then,

"He's Jesus Christ"

Bonus - not only does the article contain fun learning terms like "doctor" and "pope" but the "He's Jesus Christ" appellation was given by a Muslim chief. Isn't learning fun?

Your turn. Show us the NYT reporting "Mohammed is the Prophet".

Can't tell that an op-Ed is not a news story? No wonder you vote Democrat.

Ohhh. Now it's an op-ed. So it doesn't count. The Times must have been ahead of the curve if they didn't use those words in the 19th century. Isn't that their new slogan: Islam friendly since 1851. Too funny guy.

JERUSALEM, Jan. 8— A judge sentenced an Israeli woman to two years in prison today for putting up posters depicting the Prophet Mohammed as a pig.

World News Briefs; Israel Sentences Woman For Anti-Muslim Posters

That's a news story. Where's the news story that says Jesus the Messiah?

Yeah, as opposed to depicting her next-door neighbor, Mohammed, as a pig, which is a much lesser offense.

Still missing why you have such a wedgie about this.

 

[theliq]

The "left" doesn't say anything. The religion does that.
Religion -- politics.... know the difference.

"Messiah" by the way is Jewish.

The NY Times is controlled by Islamists? Interesting

And your Brain is RACIST