Why Does ICE Continue to Arrest Persons Who Are Here Legally?

[BULLDOG]

Two sex offenders live or used to live there with deportation order. If I am an ICE agent , I would be fully alert and take no chances given that Democrats encouraged protesters to play terrorist roles. Democrats brought this among their voters.

Used to live there? It's not too much to ask to know who they are arresting before they do it.

 

[drudge X]

So how do you explain how more than half have never been charged or convicted for any crime in any country

Irrelevant. This administration sees anyone without proper documentation to enter the country, remained in country after visa expired, or with deportation order as illegal status. The Biden administration didn’t share this. Winner gets to define what illegal means.

 

[Rogue AI]

You're not paying attention. More than half have never been charged or convicted of anything in any country.

Except for that whole being here illegally thing. That's grounds for deportation. Nobody is above the law.

 

[BULLDOG]

Presenting an ID or allowing law enforcement to fingerprint you to be identified is not too much to ask for.

But, hey that's just my opinion.

Play stupid games and see how it works out.

So you think "show me your papers" is acceptable in the US?

 

[BULLDOG]

So?

Typical cult response.

 

[DukeU]

So you think "show me your papers" is acceptable in the US?

When the police pull you over, what is the first thing they ask for?

 

[drudge X]

Used to live there? It's not too much to ask to know who they are arresting before they do it.

Because there are way too many frauds taking place when it comes to immigration. You can thank the media for the sensationalizing the attacks on ICE, writing fake news or one sided story, etc.

Last year, the were quite a few articles doing hit job on ICE. I recall headlines saying attorneys were sent deportation letter for self deport. Media ran with that bs knowing the letter is targeting the illegal aliens that the attorneys provided service. The headline wants readers to believe ICECus deporting indiscriminately.

 

[drudge X]

So you think "show me your papers" is acceptable in the US?

Why not? Ever been through DUI checkpoints and remember no vax no entry? Are those even constitutional?

 

[0311]

Be specific on what you want me to prove?
That the women murder by illegals hadn't killed or raped any one and they were all legal citizens?

"The women in the picture didn't rape or murder anyone either...and they were here legally yet they were murdered by illegals let into the country."

Post your proof they were raped and/or killed. You need to back up your MAGA MAGGOT Bullshit.

 

[BULLDOG]

You mean the ones let into the country by democrats? Okay, but that still doesn't bring back any of the women murder now does it? So you all can shut the F up about this guy being inconvenienced for a few hours, HE GETS TO COME THE F BACK HOME!!!

Punishing someone for a crime they didn't do doesn't bring back any of the women either.

 

[BULLDOG]

Irrelevant. This administration sees anyone without proper documentation to enter the country, remained in country after visa expired, or with deportation order as illegal status. The Biden administration didn’t share this. Winner gets to define what illegal means.

Our laws define what illegal means.

 

[candycorn]

What was the mistake here?

Kicking in the door of the wrong guy.
Going to the wrong guy's house.
Thinking that you needed that sort of brut force with a geriatric who has no criminal record.
Pointing a gun at someone who is no threat to anything except the springs in his recliner
Not apologizing when you destroy the guy's front door.
Not apologizing for wrongful detainment
Not learning from the clear mistakes and repeating them--according to one of your fellow right wing nut jobs--150 times now.

For starters.

 

[struth]

Typical cult response.

No, I am serious, why do you think it matters? There is no law that requires a conviction or criminal charge to be deported

 

[BULLDOG]

Except for that whole being here illegally thing. That's grounds for deportation. Nobody is above the law.

Many who are here legally have been grabbed.

 

[candycorn]

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said the ICE raid was a “targeted operation” seeking “two convicted sex offenders” at the address.


ChongLy “Scott” Thao was dragged out of his Minnesota home by ICE agents. REUTERS

Thao is a US citizen with no criminal record.

“The individual refused to be fingerprinted or facially ID’d. He matched the description of the targets,” DHS said.

MSN

So one guy matched the description of "two convicted sex offenders"? Quite a feat.

 

[candycorn]

Can you not read.

Facts about this incident were posted on the first page. I also read it from another source.

That's what has been reported.

If you have something to disprove that, I'll wait right here.

Answer the question.

Why can't people just follow basic legal instruction from law enforcement trying to do their jobs?

This guy would have never left his house if he would have just identified himself.

So if Obama were to send the ATF to your house to look for your guns because they "may be" illegal...you'd just point them out to them?

Sure.

 

[BULLDOG]

When the police pull you over, what is the first thing they ask for?

Driving on a public road is not the same as sitting in your living room.

 

[OODA_Loop]

So one guy matched the description of "two convicted sex offenders"? Quite a feat.

No they were thought to be in the house.

 

[candycorn]

If I give the police a reason to arrest me, then that’s MY fault. I was doing the wrong thing or in the wrong place. If I’m truly not guilty I’ll be able to prove it.

So you now have to prove you're not guilty?

The constitution doesn't work that way.

Perhaps you should read it some time.

 

[struth]

Kicking in the door of the wrong guy.
Going to the wrong guy's house.
Thinking that you needed that sort of brut force with a geriatric who has no criminal record.
Pointing a gun at someone who is no threat to anything except the springs in his recliner
Not apologizing when you destroy the guy's front door.
Not apologizing for wrongful detainment
Not learning from the clear mistakes and repeating them--according to one of your fellow right wing nut jobs--150 times now.
It wasn’t the wrong house. Don you not bother to read the article on the OP?
For starters.

Kicking in the door of the wrong guy.
Going to the wrong guy's house.
Thinking that you needed that sort of brut force with a geriatric who has no criminal record.
Pointing a gun at someone who is no threat to anything except the springs in his recliner
Not apologizing when you destroy the guy's front door.
Not apologizing for wrongful detainment
Not learning from the clear mistakes and repeating them--according to one of your fellow right wing nut jobs--150 times now.

For starters.

It wasn’t the wrong house, did you not bother to read the OP article?

The detainment wasn’t wrongful, did you forget to read the article? This wasn’t a mistake