YOU cite itLookup the criminal statute yourself up on the indictment.
WW
YOU CLAIMED IT.
Stop gaslighting!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YOU cite itLookup the criminal statute yourself up on the indictment.
WW
YOU cite it
YOU CLAIMED IT.
Stop gaslighting!
You can't "LOOK IT UP" you gaslighting liar, because it doesn't exist.Go look it up. The New York State Satute that Trump was charged under is in the indictment.
It's not that hard. You for some reason think the indictment doesn't list the statute. LOL
WW
You're the one making the claims.Lookup the criminal statute yourself up on the indictment.
WW
He's a liar. He can't back up a single BS claim so he tries to gaslight.You're the one making the claims.
You are agreeing with me. But you still won't admit that there was no named crime. Why won't you admit it?That is a lie.
The statute was in the indictment and the Judges instructions were very clear that the jury must return a unanimous verdict on the felony falsification of business records. They were not required to all agress on the underelying motivational crime, because that crime went to motive.
Let's not.Let's us a hypotetical example.
That is a lie.
The statute was in the indictment and the Judges instructions were very clear that the jury must return a unanimous verdict on the felony falsification of business records. They were not required to all agress on the underelying motivational crime, because that crime went to motive.
Let's us a hypotetical example. A husband is married to his wife. The husbands business is struggling. He has a life insurance policy worth millions. In addition the husband finds out that his wife is having an affair with the pool girl.
Conclusive evidence is presented at trial that the husband killed his wife. The prosecution presents evidence toward motivation. Both money and the affair. The jurors are required agree on the murder, they are not required to agree on motive. Some could believe it was for money. Some could believe it was for the affair. Some could believe it was both. They can still return a verdict on the action of murder.
WW
Yet he was convicted anyway.100% false. No underlying crime.
Every convicted felon, like Trump, says they didn’t do it. Just like Trump...did you know he’s a convicted felon? He was convicted not once, not twice but34 times. He’s a 34 X convicted felon.Why is it so hard for you to admit that?
Good? It didn't but wishing bad things on other people is bad for your soul.Yet he was convicted anyway.
Every convicted felon, like Trump, says they didn’t do it. Just like Trump...did you know he’s a convicted felon? He was convicted not once, not twice but34 times. He’s a 34 X convicted felon.
While reading this your blood pressure rose and you probably had heart palpitations.
Good.
Still didn't list the penal code.Claims?
Nope.
Jury verdict.
Your
blob
is
a
convicted
felon.
Yeah, corrupt judges and their legal systems will do that.Yet he was convicted anyway.
Every convicted felon, like Trump, says they didn’t do it. Just like Trump...did you know he’s a convicted felon? He was convicted not once, not twice but34 times. He’s a 34 X convicted felon.
While reading this your blood pressure rose and you probably had heart palpitations.
Good.
He was convicted of 34 counts of felonious falisification of business records.
Lawfare?Those were rigged, hoax convictions; Derp
