Why do the Dems have only ONE candidate atm?

Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck




.
 
Last edited:
Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck
Dems will have one candidate who goes into the general not vetted in the least. She will be susceptible to scandals and hostile press, because they arent giving her the pass they gave Obama.
 
Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

Big government is what Dems are all about at all levels. Nobody dares to step out of line in that party.
Why is it that Republicans never cut the size of Government once they get elected?

Because they are in cahoots with the Dems. Just like why do Dems allow corporations get all their sweetheart power grabs. Same thing. Both parties are selling an illusion.
 
What I find bizarre is that since 2008 the number of states that are effectively Democrat free keeps growing. Hillary will continue this trend and Rs are objecting.
 
Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck
Dems will have one candidate who goes into the general not vetted in the least. She will be susceptible to scandals and hostile press, because they arent giving her the pass they gave Obama.

Good god.....they are starting the "not vetted" crap

Hillary has been vetted non-stop for the last 23 years
 
Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck
Dems will have one candidate who goes into the general not vetted in the least. She will be susceptible to scandals and hostile press, because they arent giving her the pass they gave Obama.

Good god.....they are starting the "not vetted" crap

Hillary has been vetted non-stop for the last 23 years
Not vetted. Tried. And the last time that happened was 8 years ago. She's racked up a lot of lies and ethical lapses since then.
 
Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck
Dems will have one candidate who goes into the general not vetted in the least. She will be susceptible to scandals and hostile press, because they arent giving her the pass they gave Obama.

Good god.....they are starting the "not vetted" crap

Hillary has been vetted non-stop for the last 23 years
Not vetted. Tried. And the last time that happened was 8 years ago. She's racked up a lot of lies and ethical lapses since then.

I know.....

Ten Benghazi investigations and you still got jack shit.....some vetting
 
Democrats annoint then put up a couple of show candidates to make it look respectable.

Republicans have candidates put out their ideas and positions they fight it out in public. Democrats hide from the public as much as possible. What's seen and known is tightly controlled by democrats.

The public is led along by the carefully placed democrat breadcrumbs and told it was their idea all along.
 
Democrats annoint then put up a couple of show candidates to make it look respectable.

Republicans have candidates put out their ideas and positions they fight it out in public. Democrats hide from the public as much as possible. What's seen and known is tightly controlled by democrats.

The public is led along by the carefully placed democrat breadcrumbs and told it was their idea all along.

Republicans eat their own

Republicans are stupid
 
Democrats will have one candidate pulling all the funding. Hillary will face token competition who will drop out quickly

Meanwhile, Republicans will beat themselves up over the rightwing dollar fighting to see who is most Conservative

Bush will emerge bloodied and broke with a conservative albatross around his neck
Dems will have one candidate who goes into the general not vetted in the least. She will be susceptible to scandals and hostile press, because they arent giving her the pass they gave Obama.

Good god.....they are starting the "not vetted" crap

Hillary has been vetted non-stop for the last 23 years

Yep....She's been vetted and proven to be garbage and the Dems are still rolling with her.
 
The moonbat messiah and his mafia have dragged the democrook party into the depths of insanity. The only way a candidate stands a chance is to attempt to have opposed obozo and the neo-bolshevik path he has taken the party down. Doing so would create too much upheaval in the gaggle of special interest groups that make up the democrook party. The messiah itself would prefer to see the party destroyed than tolerate a candidate creating any dissent. I don't care who the democrooks run, every one of these fruitcakes with any name recognition is a complete and utter ridiculous characture of themselves, especially Biden, and no one is even questioning why he doesn't appear to be running.

LOL... President Biden...


laughter1.jpg


It jeven sounds funny.
 
Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.
I hope that she gets challenged by Biden, Richardson, Webb, and Kaine if he ever had the gumption to run.
 
Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.
I hope that she gets challenged by Biden, Richardson, Webb, and Kaine if he ever had the gumption to run.
Not bucketlist candidates and they have more negatives than hillary
 
15th post
Democrats rarely have more than one contender until they get to the convention. That's when they scratch their heads and their asses trying to find some alternative to make the convention look like it was about something other than booze and sex.

Sadly, the victorious nominee is always the one they picked out of their ass.
 
Hillary, Biden or Kerry

Republicans are unable to beat any of them
 
Kerry was beat by an unpopular president but Biden as a serious candidate is ridiculous.
 
Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.
I hope that she gets challenged by Biden, Richardson, Webb, and Kaine if he ever had the gumption to run.
Not bucketlist candidates and they have more negatives than hillary
That's subject to one's opinion. I think that Bill Richardson is the best out of all of the above, especially since he can get a large majority of the Latino vote and other minorities as well. In my opinion, he would get more of those votes than Hillary.
 
Back
Top Bottom