Why do the Dems have only ONE candidate atm?

[rightwinger]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

If she wins, it won't matter how many candidates they had.

.

That's irrelevant.
Why is it Hillary is not only the best the Dems can come up with, she is the only serious candidate they can come up with? What does that say about the health of the party?

It says they are going to keep taking the Whitehouse for a generation

 

[Esmeralda]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

This is too funny. This is just terribly ironic. The Democratic party has one seriously viable candidate. The Republican party has, in actuality, no seriously viable candidates. Don't question us:look to yourselves if you want to question which party is in better shape: it sure as hell isn't the GOP.

 

[rightwinger]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

This is too funny. This is just terribly ironic. The Democratic party has one seriously viable candidate. The Republican party has, in actuality, no seriously viable candidates. Don't question us:look to yourselves if you want to question which party is in better shape: it sure as hell isn't the GOP.

Democrats have a candidate who Republicans are incapable of beating

Why should they run another?

 

[The Rabbi]

The Rabbi believes his shit. It's amazing.

You have something substantive to refute it with? You have some explanation as to why Hillary should be unopposed in this election? Do you have any thoughts beyond "is this edible" at all?

Dude......you are delusional. What new ideas are brimming from the. GOP field? They don't have a single new ******* idea.

I don't think Clinton should run unopposed in the primary. Those are your words. And.....unless you know something I don't the Democratic nominee will certainly not run unopposed.

The best thing about you is the lack of awareness. I've provided my thoughts here for several years now.....and you've never been able to handle the fact that they are measured and presented with clarity. I insult you because you deserve derision.

Please post any credible rivals for the Democrat nomination.
Case closed.

 

[The Rabbi]

That's irrelevant.
Why is it Hillary is not only the best the Dems can come up with, she is the only serious candidate they can come up with? What does that say about the health of the party?

The Dems as a party certainly aren't any worse off than the Republicans, and the fact that the GOP has so many candidates doesn't mean they're good candidates.

Yes, the partisan conservatives think all these people are wonderful, but they're a little biased.

The GOP has obviously been strong in localized elections recently, but the presidential election is its own animal.

My guess would be that she has pretty much sucked all the air out of the room for potential Dem candidates for years now, so maybe some are just gonna wait. This is gonna be a circus, maybe they don't want to be a part of it.

.

You're joking, right?
The GOP has a crop of prominent TP senators and at least one governor, with several more people yet to announce. They are accomplished people in their own right, very articulate and brimming with new ideas. They are a diverse group as well.
You are right about Hillary sucking. She is known for an enormous Rolodex and the ability to raise money. No one has wanted to challenge her on those grounds. But that's all she has. Putting all your eggs in one basket at the start of a primary season is a recipe for disaster. What happens if she has a stroke? What happens if some scandal explodes? I mean, I know so far she has been scandal free and it is tough to think of somethign worse than what's been put out there so far. But what if she craps out with voters like her book crapped out with readers? The Dems are totally screwed.

Well, full disclosure, I'm lousy at predicting political stuff.

My memory still works well, however, and I'm already seeing shades of 2012 in the GOP predictions.

I guess we'll see.

.

2012 should have been a GOP win. It would have been without massive voter turnout in inner city districts in key states. That wont happen this time.

Yeah! If only all "those" people hasn't voted......Romney would have won!!

At least you didn't do what you normally do and blame it on the media and voter fraud. Progress, I suppose.

Well voter suppression by the iRS and others certainly played a part. But are you planning on denying that massive turnout in inner city black areas in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia had nothing to do with Obama's upset win?

 

[The Rabbi]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

Big government is what Dems are all about at all levels. Nobody dares to step out of line in that party.

Why is it that Republicans never cut the size of Government once they get elected?

Because they have Democrats to deal with.
Why is it Democrats never propose anything to reduce government spending, even when they say the deficit is a problem?

 

[The Rabbi]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

This is too funny. This is just terribly ironic. The Democratic party has one seriously viable candidate. The Republican party has, in actuality, no seriously viable candidates. Don't question us:look to yourselves if you want to question which party is in better shape: it sure as hell isn't the GOP.

Democrats have a candidate who Republicans are incapable of beating

Why should they run another?

Democrats are running a candidate who will manage to win the nomination only because there are no serious candidates to beat. She couldnt win in 2009 when she was younger, fresher, and had ideas that sounded new. How is she going to win now regurgitatiing the same old class warfare crap people have heard for 8 years and has failed?

 

[Stephanie]

Why? because they know their base will vote for IT so why bother putting up anyone else.

that's sad a fact we all need to face. How their voters don't see it as Humiliating, they take them for sheep....beats me

 

[The Rabbi]

Why? because they know their base will vote for IT so why bother putting up anyone else.

that's sad a fact we all need to face. How their voters don't see it as Humiliating, they take them for sheep....beats me

Hillary will get all the votes of the Dem base, the union thugs, fudge packers, ivory tower dwellers, and welfare cheats.
She will lose out with millenials, who dont remember Bill Clinton except in connection with sexual harassment, white men, married women, Hispanics, and anyone who thinks ethics n government is important. She is toast. Without serious primary opposition she will flail in the general election.

 

[Moonglow]

Since all GOP candidates that have announced their candidacy have flipped on their immigration stand, how well will the GOP base be offended?

 

[The Rabbi]

Since all GOP candidates that have announced their candidacy have flipped on their immigration stand, how well will the GOP base be offended?

Actually none of them have. The realities of dealing with sleazy Democrats who have no intention of solving the problem take immigration reform off the table.

 

[Moonglow]

Since all GOP candidates that have announced their candidacy have flipped on their immigration stand, how well will the GOP base be offended?

Actually none of them have. The realities of dealing with sleazy Democrats who have no intention of solving the problem take immigration reform off the table.

Paul flipped as has Rubio, but it's not my problem to deal with...

 

[The Rabbi]

Since all GOP candidates that have announced their candidacy have flipped on their immigration stand, how well will the GOP base be offended?

Actually none of them have. The realities of dealing with sleazy Democrats who have no intention of solving the problem take immigration reform off the table.

Paul flipped as has Rubio, but it's not my problem to deal with...

Prove it or STFU

 

[Stephanie]

Why? because they know their base will vote for IT so why bother putting up anyone else.

that's sad a fact we all need to face. How their voters don't see it as Humiliating, they take them for sheep....beats me

Hillary will get all the votes of the Dem base, the union thugs, fudge packers, ivory tower dwellers, and welfare cheats.
She will lose out with millenials, who dont remember Bill Clinton except in connection with sexual harassment, white men, married women, Hispanics, and anyone who thinks ethics n government is important. She is toast. Without serious primary opposition she will flail in the general election.

She's like the OLD shiny toy that their party plays games on them with. Myself, I'd be offended over ALL the games they play on them. I mean now they are dressing her down to make it seem she's like one of them LITTLE folks in the country....so transparent

 

[Redfish]

Why would they need more?

When your candidate is obvious, why run more?

did you say obnoxious?

 

[LoneLaugher]

The Rabbi believes his shit. It's amazing.

You have something substantive to refute it with? You have some explanation as to why Hillary should be unopposed in this election? Do you have any thoughts beyond "is this edible" at all?

Dude......you are delusional. What new ideas are brimming from the. GOP field? They don't have a single new ******* idea.

I don't think Clinton should run unopposed in the primary. Those are your words. And.....unless you know something I don't the Democratic nominee will certainly not run unopposed.

The best thing about you is the lack of awareness. I've provided my thoughts here for several years now.....and you've never been able to handle the fact that they are measured and presented with clarity. I insult you because you deserve derision.

Please post any credible rivals for the Democrat nomination.
Case closed.

You've not closed anything.

 

[Preacher]

Sanders or Warren and MAYBE Schwartz from Montana....I would consider any of those 3.

 

[The Rabbi]

The Rabbi believes his shit. It's amazing.

You have something substantive to refute it with? You have some explanation as to why Hillary should be unopposed in this election? Do you have any thoughts beyond "is this edible" at all?

Dude......you are delusional. What new ideas are brimming from the. GOP field? They don't have a single new ******* idea.

I don't think Clinton should run unopposed in the primary. Those are your words. And.....unless you know something I don't the Democratic nominee will certainly not run unopposed.

The best thing about you is the lack of awareness. I've provided my thoughts here for several years now.....and you've never been able to handle the fact that they are measured and presented with clarity. I insult you because you deserve derision.

Please post any credible rivals for the Democrat nomination.
Case closed.

You've not closed anything.

Are there are credible rivals for the nomination?
No.
Case closed.

 

[rightwinger]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

This is too funny. This is just terribly ironic. The Democratic party has one seriously viable candidate. The Republican party has, in actuality, no seriously viable candidates. Don't question us:look to yourselves if you want to question which party is in better shape: it sure as hell isn't the GOP.

Democrats have a candidate who Republicans are incapable of beating

Why should they run another?

Democrats are running a candidate who will manage to win the nomination only because there are no serious candidates to beat. She couldnt win in 2009 when she was younger, fresher, and had ideas that sounded new. How is she going to win now regurgitatiing the same old class warfare crap people have heard for 8 years and has failed?

Obama and Clinton were 1a and 1b in 2008

Looks like it is time for 1b to be President

 

[The Rabbi]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

This is too funny. This is just terribly ironic. The Democratic party has one seriously viable candidate. The Republican party has, in actuality, no seriously viable candidates. Don't question us:look to yourselves if you want to question which party is in better shape: it sure as hell isn't the GOP.

Democrats have a candidate who Republicans are incapable of beating

Why should they run another?

Democrats are running a candidate who will manage to win the nomination only because there are no serious candidates to beat. She couldnt win in 2009 when she was younger, fresher, and had ideas that sounded new. How is she going to win now regurgitatiing the same old class warfare crap people have heard for 8 years and has failed?

Obama and Clinton were 1a and 1b in 2008

Looks like it is time for 1b to be President

Looks like it's time for the Democrat clown car to pull over and let somene else drive.