Why do the Dems have only ONE candidate atm?

[Disir]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

Unless Bernie Sanders runs as a Dem then she is all the Democrats have. This is what happens when you spend all of your time pointing to Bush and refusing to deal with actual policy. It's the same mistake that the Republicans make. They are so busy saying Obama that they didn't bother with policy. They don't have jack to run either. They know it.

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states. It's not about actual policy in my opinion, it's basically that the democratic power structure and some if not many "mainstream" Democrats think that it's Hillary's time to get the nomination. I think that is a grave mistake for them even though I did hear some electoral vote projection that has her winning.
I know that a fair amount of politicians are basically full of it but she just doesn't seem genuine in some way. I also feel like that she will have more of a mainstream republican type of foreign policy and that she will keep the status quo or add more restriction as far as civil liberties issues go. BUT, if it's Cruz, Rubio, Walker vs Hillary, I would vote for her. If it was Bush vs Hillary , I would toss a coin. Rand Paul needs to cement his views further during debates because right now I don't trust him. He cosponsored a Bill with Corey Booker regarding prison reform and I like that they both went across party lines to work for a common cause.

I disagree. Otherwise you wouldn't have either of those parties all of a sudden focusing on income inequality. They are aware that he is a threat. They simply want to appeal without making changes.

Hillary is Republican-light. She always has been. Foreign policy doesn't change.

Rand Paul's views are already well known. He has a history. He won't make it. Walker, Rubio and Cruz as well.

Where do we disagree?

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states.

It's all about the policy.

 

[Pheonixops]

Who besides Shrillary will be running? I thought this was a the Party of the "big tent"? Why are they running the same rehashed white, rich woman who has been in politics for 30 years? No new blood? No young blood? No fresh ideas? What gives? The cons have at least 10 serious candidates.

Unless Bernie Sanders runs as a Dem then she is all the Democrats have. This is what happens when you spend all of your time pointing to Bush and refusing to deal with actual policy. It's the same mistake that the Republicans make. They are so busy saying Obama that they didn't bother with policy. They don't have jack to run either. They know it.

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states. It's not about actual policy in my opinion, it's basically that the democratic power structure and some if not many "mainstream" Democrats think that it's Hillary's time to get the nomination. I think that is a grave mistake for them even though I did hear some electoral vote projection that has her winning.
I know that a fair amount of politicians are basically full of it but she just doesn't seem genuine in some way. I also feel like that she will have more of a mainstream republican type of foreign policy and that she will keep the status quo or add more restriction as far as civil liberties issues go. BUT, if it's Cruz, Rubio, Walker vs Hillary, I would vote for her. If it was Bush vs Hillary , I would toss a coin. Rand Paul needs to cement his views further during debates because right now I don't trust him. He cosponsored a Bill with Corey Booker regarding prison reform and I like that they both went across party lines to work for a common cause.

I disagree. Otherwise you wouldn't have either of those parties all of a sudden focusing on income inequality. They are aware that he is a threat. They simply want to appeal without making changes.

Hillary is Republican-light. She always has been. Foreign policy doesn't change.

Rand Paul's views are already well known. He has a history. He won't make it. Walker, Rubio and Cruz as well.

Where do we disagree?

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states.

It's all about the policy.

I re-read your post, now I see what you meant.

 

[Pete7469]

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states.

It's all about the policy.

His heart may believe socialism will help people, but his head is up his ass.

Socialism has never, and will never enrich anyone besides the people who dole out the scraps to the proles.

That said I don't think any political whore that holds public office is stupid enough to believe socialism can work. They're all in it for self aggrandizement and power. Anyone who believes otherwise is the sort of mindless zealot all the murderous despots of the last 100 years have used to secure the authority to wipe out countless millions of innocent people.

 

[Disir]

Bernie Sanders' heart is in the right place, but he would possibly pull on three states.

It's all about the policy.

His heart may believe socialism will help people, but his head is up his ass.

Socialism has never, and will never enrich anyone besides the people who dole out the scraps to the proles.

That said I don't think any political whore that holds public office is stupid enough to believe socialism can work. They're all in it for self aggrandizement and power. Anyone who believes otherwise is the sort of mindless zealot all the murderous despots of the last 100 years have used to secure the authority to wipe out countless millions of innocent people.

Again. It's about the actual policies. The US has always had a mixed economy. It isn't going anywhere. It is time to move on. He isn't a socialist. Now, you can sit there and foam at the mouth over the word socialist and think you are getting somewhere but that played out some time ago.

 

[Pete7469]

Again. It's about the actual policies. The US has always had a mixed economy. It isn't going anywhere. It is time to move on. He isn't a socialist. Now, you can sit there and foam at the mouth over the word socialist and think you are getting somewhere but that played out some time ago.

Bernie Sanders - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders (born September 8, 1941) is an American politician and the junior United States Senator from Vermont. Before serving in the Senate, he represented Vermont's at-large congressional district in the United States House of Representatives and served as mayor of Burlington, the largest city in Vermont. Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist,[1][2] and has praised Scandinavian-style social democracy.[3][4]

What is it with you bed wetters? ISIL calls themselves islamic and promotes the most radical aspects of that cult, but mindless retards like you and your ******* messiah can stand flat footed and insist "they're not" what they call themselves or promote. How do people like you survive without falling down escalators? You have to be weapons grade stupid to even suggest Bernie isn't a full blown regressive lunatic.

Furthermore we have not "always had a mixed economy", I can't even quantify the abject stupidity of that statement. I can tell you that it will be rolled back to a more free market based system at some point because the centralized collective aspect of it will fail after drowning in debt, just like it has in everywhere else. The only reason the euroweenies have gotten away with it for so long is because we have funded their entire defense budget for decades. As soon as we stop, and someday we'll have too, their welfare parasites are going to burn down their cities.

 

[william the wie]

Sanders has zero appeal outside of D voters

 

[Disir]

Again. It's about the actual policies. The US has always had a mixed economy. It isn't going anywhere. It is time to move on. He isn't a socialist. Now, you can sit there and foam at the mouth over the word socialist and think you are getting somewhere but that played out some time ago.

Bernie Sanders - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Bernard "Bernie" Sanders (born September 8, 1941) is an American politician and the junior United States Senator from Vermont. Before serving in the Senate, he represented Vermont's at-large congressional district in the United States House of Representatives and served as mayor of Burlington, the largest city in Vermont. Sanders is a self-described democratic socialist,[1][2] and has praised Scandinavian-style social democracy.[3][4]

What is it with you bed wetters? ISIL calls themselves islamic and promotes the most radical aspects of that cult, but mindless retards like you and your ******* messiah can stand flat footed and insist "they're not" what they call themselves or promote. How do people like you survive without falling down escalators? You have to be weapons grade stupid to even suggest Bernie isn't a full blown regressive lunatic.

Furthermore we have not "always had a mixed economy", I can't even quantify the abject stupidity of that statement. I can tell you that it will be rolled back to a more free market based system at some point because the centralized collective aspect of it will fail after drowning in debt, just like it has in everywhere else. The only reason the euroweenies have gotten away with it for so long is because we have funded their entire defense budget for decades. As soon as we stop, and someday we'll have too, their welfare parasites are going to burn down their cities.

I know he "is a self described democratic socialist". Now, go look at his track record.

I am not a democrat. You need to listen to what I am actually saying instead of what you want to hear.

Yes. We have always had a mixed economy. I see how you feel but you don't have a point after that.

 

[Disir]

Sanders has zero appeal outside of D voters

Sanders has more appeal outside of the D voters. The D voters are clamoring for Warren as if they are both the same and they are not.

 

[william the wie]

Sanders will get no traction.

 

[HenryBHough]

Potential candidates are a dime a dozen for Democrats.

It's just that it's Hell trying to find an unindicted one.

 

[Disir]

Sanders will get no traction.

He already has traction. The Ds don't like it. They didn't choose it. Thats why they all ran to Warren. The Rs don't like it. Now, both of sides are trying to figure out how to pander to working classes.

Like watching Soros and the Koch brothers talking like they know whats best for the little people. And Gates. Didn't mean to leave him out.