"the Constitution could be stripped off and thrown aside
Finish the quote.
and the nation would still stand forth in the living vestment of flesh and sinew, warm with the heart-blood of one people, ready to recreate constitutions and laws."
Ah, your little servant has embarassed you by doing what you were afraid to do!
What the **** are you babbling about? Do you know how to read the screenname of a poster?
Except that's not what he said at all. You tried to pretend it was via quote mining and were proven a dishonest little ****.
Fail.
Finish the quote.
You're the moron here
No, it doesn't you just quoted it- the second clause only says 'constitutions'- one time.
Go back to school and learn English.
Good question. Which are you?
Not what it says. It says that it is not mere parchment which unifies us as a single nation. You need to take some Reading Comprehension courses.
Summary:
a) The quote shows that Wilson had no respect for our Constitution, but intended to write his own.
No, it doesn't
b) You are a dolt who, like so many liberals, will not own up to his mistakes.
You're insane
Let's see how easy it is to prove that you are not only stupid, but resistant to learning:
1. "Justly revered as our great Constitution is, it could be stripped off and thrown aside like a garment, and the nation would still stand forth in the living vestment of flesh and sinew, warm with the heart-blood of one people, ready to recreate constitutions and laws.
"Woodrow Wilson
Wilsons
belief that the Constitution was an antique absurdity. Wilson championed the idea of the living Constitution which enables activist judges to re-write the Constitution according to the Progressive notions of the day.
Obama and Woodrow Wilson
How about another?
2. Justly revered as our great Constitution is, it could be stripped off and thrown aside like a garment, and the nation would still stand forth in the living vestment of flesh and sinew, warm with the heart-blood of one people, ready to recreate constitutions and laws.
Woodrow Wilson
Justly revered, but not by Wilson.
He really did want to cast the founders Constitution aside, writing no doubt a great deal of nonsense has been talked about the inalienable rights of the individual, and a great deal that was mere vague sentiment and pleasing speculation has been put forward as fundamental principle
And the rights contained in it.
Wilson undoubtedly helped along the process of building the modern statist liberalism.
Karl Marx And Liberal Fascism Tarpon's Swamp
Need another kick in the butt?
3. Wilson
disliked the American Constitution and said so on many occasions. He adopted enough progressive ideas to win his 1912 victory; in 1916, he bought them hook, line and sinker in order to pull most of the vote that Roosevelt won in the previous election. The Democratic platform of 1916 reads like a progressive's prayer book. Democrats were no longer the party of Jefferson; they were the Wilsonian Party, or the Progressive Party in everything but name.
Our Raped Constitution
How about another slap or two?
4. If you want to understand how the Constitution was rewritten in the 20th century by the Progressive movement, the place to start is with Woodrow Wilson....was the intellectual foundation of Progressivism and of Wilsons belief that the Constitution was an antique absurdity. Wilson championed the idea of the living Constitution which enables activist judges to
re-write the Constitution according to the Progressive notions of the day.
Woodrow Wilson's Constitution
by Robert Curry
Issue 112 - July 23, 2008
Here's some more, you ignorant dolt:
5. Progressive critique of the principles of the American Founding and the Founders' Constitution. Wilson, who was president of Princeton and of the American Political Science Association before becoming President of the United States, was the first Chief Executive to openly criticize the Constitution,
once comparing it to "political witchcraft."
The Claremont Institute - Two New Books on Woodrow Wilson
And another, you cowardly twerp:
6. All that progressives ask or desire is permissionin an era when "development," "evolution," is the scientific word
to interpret the Constitution according to the Darwinian principle; all they ask is recognition of the fact that a nation is a living thing and not a machine."
From Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People (1913). (New York: Doubleday, Page & Company, 1913
Here, here, take a moment to catch your breath...let's play a guessing game:
Can you guess who the low class, lying, poltroon who said...
"Not what it says. It says that it is not mere parchment which unifies us as a single nation. You need to take some Reading Comprehension courses."
Did ya guess????
You are not only an idiot, but a ill-mannered buffoon. Retract your lies that I mis-quoted in any way, or accept the label of being a pantywaist coward.
Hey- Im trying to compose my post, but you screaming Mommy, make the pain stop' is soooo distracting!
