Why do school board hearings cut parents from reading sexually explicit excerpts because of children?

LeftofLeft

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 2011
22,432
12,923
1,405


Can anyone explain this logic? Parents concerned about sexually explicit content available in school libraries for children to read take their case to school board meetings, read the excerpts to demonstrate how explicit this is for children, then the board cuts them off because children are present either in-person or virtually? Yet the boards stand firm on leaving the book in place.
 
Those books were never on the reading list for the younger children who might have been watching that, and are obviously inappropriate for that age group. Older students, are exposed to much more explicit material than that on TV every day.
 


Can anyone explain this logic? Parents concerned about sexually explicit content available in school libraries for children to read take their case to school board meetings, read the excerpts to demonstrate how explicit this is for children, then the board cuts them off because children are present either in-person or virtually? Yet the boards stand firm on leaving the book in place.

Doesn't make much sense. That school board should be voted out.
 
Those books were never on the reading list for the younger children who might have been watching that, and are obviously inappropriate for that age group. Older students, are exposed to much more explicit material than that on TV every day.
You're a moron. By your logic, the youth can access XXX or beastiality on line, so you believe it should be available to them in the school liibrary, but heaven forbid, the school board be exposed to it. FUCKING IDIOT!
 
You're a moron. By your logic, the youth can access XXX or beastiality on line, so you believe it should be available to them in the school liibrary, but heaven forbid, the school board be exposed to it. FUCKING IDIOT!
That isn't anything near what I said, dumb ass. Try to follow what my words said instead of the voices in your head.
 
Those books were never on the reading list for the younger children who might have been watching that, and are obviously inappropriate for that age group. Older students, are exposed to much more explicit material than that on TV every day.

It's in the school library fer fukes sake!!
Any kid could pick it up. And now they probably will.
 
It's in the school library fer fukes sake!!
Any kid could pick it up. And now they probably will.
You think grammar school students have regular access to the high school sections of the library, or that they are usually even in the same room?
 
You made a statement that suggested you often came across beastiality with your daily TV viewing.
Are you still watching television on your 12" black and white cathode ray tube. Most people these days have smart tvs and phones that are capable of accessing the internet and streaming services. In addition, if you followed the thread, the moron who I was responding to suggested that students could access worse on THEIR televisions so that in some way gave way to accepting any kind of filth being presented in school libraries or presenting their case to a school board. Please keep up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top